Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Council archive · source document

Pearl and Elm St - Planning Report · MCU21/0117.01

of 18

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

LO7-01_D D

Jackson

Landscape Details, prepared by Blackburne19-12-23

The change to condition 2 is sought as the built form, layout and number of dwellings is changing,

and the plans reflect those changes. As set out in the Table below, the development fully complies

with all the key parameters except for a minor building height encroachment and a reduction in

open space for unit 7, which is assessed thereafter. Noting that the setback to Pearl Street is 5.5

metres, less than the 6 metres required by the code, however, the setback is the same as that

approved and consists of a small portion of balcony roof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Criteria Planning Scheme Approved Approved Proposed development | Complies
development Development Change application
Complies
Building height
2 storeys max 2 storeys v 2 storeys v
* storeys 8 metres 7.9 metres v 8.2m PO
e metres
Site cover 45% max (1,023m’) 45% (1,023m*) v 44.78 (1017.8?) v
Gross floor area 1,137? max 114m? v 0.5:1 (1136.4?) v
Plot ratio 0.5:1 max.
Boundary setbacks
¢ Frontage (Pearl) 6 metres min 5.5 metres Comply with PO | 5.5m v
v
¢ Side (north) 1.5/2.0/2.5 metres 2 metres 2 metres v
v
¢ Side (south) 1.5/2.0/2.5 metres 7 metres v 7 metres v
¢ Side (east) 1.5/2.0/2.5 metres min | 2 metres v 2 metres v
© Side (west) 1.5/2.0/2.5 metres min 2 metres v 6 metres Vv
¢ Frontage (Elm) 6 metres min 6 metres Vv 6 metres v
Length of wall 15 metres max 15 metres v <15 metres v
Roof Form
, Min 5 degrees 15 degrees v 20 degrees v
* Pitch Min 600mm to 75% 600mm to >75% | ¥ 600mm to >75% v
e Eaves
Landscaped open 796m? min (35%) 803rr? v 814.5m? (35.8%) v
space 60% of total >60% v / 515m? (63.5%) v
Soft landscaping 6m to frontage except Om to Pearl Comply with PO | >2 metres v
Landscaping for parking and open
Setbacks space — 2m min
Private Open Space | 20m? min @ ground >20m? v >20m? v
9m? min @ above ground NA - Except for unit 7 which PO
has 17m?
Carparking 13 covered min 13 covered v 14 covered v
3 visitor 3 visitor v 4 uncovered v

As demonstrated in the Table above, the proposal fully complies with all key parameters except for

building height and open space for unit 7.

RG Strategic

Planning Report — Minor Change Application

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.5 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Pearl and Elm St - Planning Report.pdf · 2.5 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.