Council archive · source document
Request to Amend Application and Response to DSDIP's Information Request · MCU14/0009
Attached to the e-mail MCU14/0009 information response and request to amend application.
3.4 Mitigated Scenario
When comparing the peak flows in the existing and developed scenario, increases in
the peak discharge occur at the catchment outlet. As a result a detention system will
be required in order to achieve non-worsening from the site.
All modeling parameters remain consistent between the developed and mitigated
scenarios, with the addition of a detention system before outlet to site (refer
Appendix 1). The storage details included within the model are provided in Table
15.
Table 15: Storage and Outlet Details of Underground Detention System
Storage
Storage Height Outlet Configuration Peak 100yr WSL
Volume
1 x 300mm at RL0.0m; and
10m3 0.3m RL0.3m
1.5m wide weir at RL0.22m
A comparison of the peak flows between the existing, developed and mitigated
scenarios are presented below in Table 16. It can be seen that non-worsening of
peak flows are achieved at each outlet to the site.
Table 16: Comparison of Existing, Developed and Mitigated WBNM Outlet Peak Flows
Existing Peak Developed Peak Mitigated Peak Change in Peak
Flow (m3/s) Flow (m3/s) Flow (m3/s) Flow (m3/s)
1 year 0.048 0.05 0.044 -0.004
2 year 0.062 0.063 0.062 0
5 year 0.078 0.079 0.078 0
10 year 0.088 0.089 0.088 0
20 year 0.101 0.102 0.101 0
50 year 0.112 0.114 0.112 0
100 year 0.125 0.127 0.123 -0.002
WBNM outputs are provided in Appendix 2 of this report.
11
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Request to Amend Application and Response to DSDIP's Information Request.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.