Original source · versioned page text
Delegated Report - Code - Planning RAL21 0026
Reconfiguring a Lot Code
The proposed lot sizes are 931m2 for Lot 31 and 854m2 for Lot 32, which comply with the minimum
lot size of 600m2 as per the Reconfiguring a Lot Code. The proposal also complies with minimum
lot width, with Lot 31 to have a width of 20.5 metres and Lot 32 to have a width of 19 metres. The
shape of the proposed boundary between the two lots does not raise any concerns as it has been
designed to avoid the existing pool on Lot 31. The shape of the lots will not impact on future
development pursuits.
Low Density Residential Zone Code
Setbacks
The existing sheds on the northern boundary of the property do not comply with setback
requirements as per the Low Density Residential Zone Code. Due to the existing vegetation along
the northern and eastern boundaries, the structures do not raise any concerns regarding impacts
to adjoining properties or land uses.
Operational Works
The applicant has provided plans to provide for drainage, stormwater and an access driveway to
Lot 32. Council’s Development Assessment engineering officer has reviewed the plans and has
recommended relevant conditions that forms part of this approval.
4. CONSULTATION
4.1. Referral Agencies
The applicant was referred to the following Referral Agencies:
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning (SARA)
The Department is a referral agency for Schedule 10, Part 4, Division 3, Table 1 (Planning
Regulation 2017): Premises contaminated because of unexploded ordnance.
The Department has responded advising that: Provide the owner, occupier and any person
employed to work on the subject site the following information:
(a) Residual UXO may still exist following remediation and all work should proceed with due
caution.
(b) The procedure to be followed by any person finding an object suspected of being
explosive ordnance or component thereof:
i. advise the police immediately
ii. do not disturb the object
iii. take action, where appropriate, to prevent it being disturbed.
(c) Another person:
i. note its approximate dimensions and general appearance
ii. note the route to its location.
4.2. Internal Council Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers for review and/or comment:
Engineering Officer – comments and conditions provided
Comments:
The applicant suitably addressed all the items raised in the information request.
Frontage works (K&C and Footpath) were not required as – in line with the character and
characteristics of the street – there is no existing SW collection infrastructure in the area (i.e.
K&C would concentrate flows) and there is no footpath connection to the west of the subject
property.
Page 4 of 13
Document Set ID: 21928199
Version: 7, Version Date: 26/05/2022
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.