Council archive · source document
SUPERSEDED - Request for Change to Development Approval 51993.587.03
Very large file (12.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
11i~11~~m~ ~~ il!~li @ ~1<
kc-
80603875
5IgC1~o5~7.03
8M IBOJ..SL83.R:..J.O......
14 February 2013
OCs ICAS
Our Ref: 13015 / Office: Sunshine Coast
SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL
LOCKED BAG 72
SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE QLD 4560 De
v<
ATTENTION: Development Assessment -
North
I
Dear Sir/Madam I~,
Q
REQUEST FOR CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL o
2 NEPTUNE CIRCUIT, NOOSAVILLE
LOTS 1 &. 2 &. COMMON PROPERTY ON BUP 100427
In relation to the existing Development Approval (TPC 2563) for the abov
of the applicant we hereby request a change to the development approval
369 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.
Please find enclosed the following documentation to facilitate Council’s ass
Attachment 1 -
Request to change an existing approval form;
Attachment 2 -
Owners Consent;
Attachment 3 -
Approved Plans; and
Attachment 4 -
Proposal Plans.
A cheque for the amount of $2,653.00 made payable to Sunshine Co
the relevant Council lodgement fee.
The Proposed Change
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 21 pages
Page 2
I
Density
The existing/approved density is 3 bedrooms per unit. The rate of occ
containing 3 or more bedrooms is 3.3 persons. No change to existing/appr
Height
No change to the eXisting/approved building height will result.
Site Cover
No change to eXisting/approved site cover w l result.
Gross Floor
For the Attached Housing Zone within the Noosav le Locality the maximum
the maximum population in persons multiplied by 40m2. The current maxi
would be 6.5 (ie 650m2 @ 100 persons per hectare) x 40 260m2. As de
=
in Attachment 4 the proposed GFA is 290m2 (254m2existing plus 36m2 pro
exceeds the maximum of 260m2, required by Specific outcome 013 of the
is considered this provision is an anomaly with the scheme and is not co
GFA for the lesser intensity Semi-attached Housing Zone or for duplexes w
Zone in other localities.
Under The Noosaville Locality Code an anomaly exists between the allo
attached Housing Zone and the Attached Housing Zone. The lower inten
Zone allows for a maximum GFA of 45% -
292.5m2 (specific outcome
intensity Attached Housing Zone only allows for a maximum GFA of 40%
013).
A further anomaly exists between the Noosaville locality and all othe
Attached Housing Zone, with respect of the allowable GFA for duplexes
which have an Attached Housing Zone, duplexes are allowed a maxim
duplexes in the Attached Housing Zone in the Noosaville Locality are only
40%. There is no logical planning rationale why duplexes in the Attach
other localities should be allowed a higher GFA than duplexes in the Attach
Noosaville locality. It is noted that Council has recently approved a dup
Noosaville on the basis the planning scheme allows a 45% GFA for a dupl
Zone.
It is understood the allowance of 45% GFA for duplexes in the Atta
deliberate intention to encourage duplex housing forms rather than larger a
In this regard the proposed GFA is consistent with the intent of the Noo
Attached Zone and is considered an outcome for the si
Page 3
(c)for an approval for assessable development that previously required im
in the responsible entity’s opinion, to cause a person to make a properly ma
the proposed change, if the circumstances allowed; or
(d)cause development to which the approval relates to indude any prohibi
The proposed change meets this criterion as follows:
. The change does not result in a substantially different development, as
o remains the same use;
o does not result in the application applying to a new par l of l
o does not dramatically change the built form in terms of sale, bu
o does not change the operational intent of the use;
o does not remove a component that is integral to the operation
o does not significantly increase traffic flows;
o does not introduce new impacts;
o does not remove any component that would have balanced
development; and
o does not impact on infrastructure provision.
. If the application was remade it would not require referral to any addit
. The original was subject to impact assessment;
. The change is unlikely to cause a person to make a properly
drcumstances allowed as no change to use, increase in density or bui
and
. Does not include any prohibited development.
In light of the above, it is considered that the proposed change which com
the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, is minor in nature and does not offen
approval or the current Noosa Plan. Approval of the request to change t
therefore warranted.
Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not he
~.
Scott
Page 4
ATTA REQUEST TO CHANGE AND EXISTING AP [OCR of page images] ATTACHMENT 1 REQUEST TO CHANGE AND EXISTING APPROVAL FORM
Page 5
,
Sunshine Coast
I Council
Development Information Counter T: 54757526 I Maroochy
ALL questions MUST be completed unless the form indicates otherwise.
This form must be submitted to Council accompanied by the applicable fee.
Attach extra pages if there is insufficient space on the form.
If Council was the Assessment Manager for the existing approval, and the approval was iss
(a)a request to change the development approval and/or conditions is made to the Court; a
(b)a request to extend the relevant period for the approval is made to Council.
All terms used on the form have the meaning given in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 or
2009.
Full name -
individual or company: Jeremy Honeyman and Geoff Wild C/- KHA Dev
Contact Name -
for company: Scott Sobey
Postal address: PO Box 6380
Suburb: Maroochydore BC State: aid
Business phone: 5443 2844 AlH phone: M
Email address:[email protected] fF
2. Details of existing approval
Type of approval (please tick ALL applicable categories) Which entity issued ap
./ Development Permit ./ Sunshine Coast Co
0 Preliminary Approval o Other entity ple
-
0 Compliance Permit
./ Material Change of Use
0 Reconfiguring a Lot
0 Operational Works
0 Building Works
0 Plumbing or Drainage Works
0 Compliance Certificate
0 Environmentally Relevant Activity 1
Application number/council reference: TPC2563
Page 6
3. Nature of request (please tick ALL applicable categories)
./ To change the D To change the D
development approval development conditions
Please attach documentation outlining the detail of and the reasons and justif
extension.
1 & 2 & common property BUP100427
l_ - - +
5. Concurrence Agencies
Was there one or more concurrence agencies involved in the original approval?
Note -
Under s372 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 the person making the request is re
concurrence agencies.
Concurrence Agency
6. Pre-request response notice
Has a pre-request response been given by a relevant entity (e.g. a concurrence ag
./ No DYes
If yes, please attach a copy of the notice.
Page 7
Coast
ISunshine
Council
,
NOTES: For question 7
Under section 371 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, if the person making the request is
approval relates, the request must be accompanied by the owner’s consent.
However, owner’s consent is not required if the approval:
relates to land the was acquisition land to which section 263(2)(d) of the Sustainable Pla
application for the approval was made; or
is for building work or operational work for the supply of community infrastructure on lan
infrastructure; or
the consent of the owner would not be required under section 263(1)of the Sustainable
application were made for the requested change.
Also, owner’s consent is not required if the Assessment Manager is satisfied that:
the number of owners of the land make it impractical to obtain owners’ consent, and the
affect the owners’ land; or
having regard to the nature of the proposed change,the owner has unreasonably withhe
does not materially affect the owner’s land.
8. Does the request involve a State resource prescribed under the Sustainabl
Schedule 14?
~ No DYes -
complete belo
Nature of State owned resource:
Nature of Evidence required:
o Evidence of allocation of I entitlement to, the resource 0 Evidence the chief ex
Attach a copy of the evidence required above
NOTES: For question 8
Section 370(3) and (4)of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 requires that if an application fo
the time of making this request and evidence under section 264(1) of the Sustainable Planni
the application, this request must be accompanied by the written agreement of the chief exec
required under section 264(1).
Section 264 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 provides that if a development involves a S
the application to be supported by certain evidence prescribed under regulation. Schedule 1
2009 prescribes the State resources for which evidence is required to be given, and the evid
9. Declaration of applicant
I/We, the applicant, declare that the above information is correct in all respects, at t
application with the Sunshine Coast Regional Council. Should any of the details giv
Page 8
OFFICE USE ONLY
Application no. Amount paid Date paid Receipt no. Initial
r -t
Receiving Officer
Page 9
ATTA OWN [OCR of page images] ATTACHMENT 2 OWNER’S CONSENT
Page 10
KHA Ref: 13015
SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL
LOCKED BAG 72
SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE QLD 4560
Dear Sir/Madam
LANDOWNER’S CONSENT
CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
2 NEPTUNE CIRCUIT, NOOSAVILLE
LOTS 1 & 2 & COMMON PROPERTY ON BUP 100427
GEOFFREY GRANT WILD & ADRIENNE LOUISE WILD as owners o
CIRCUIT, NOOSAVILLE, described as LOT 1 ON SUP 100427, hereby c
development application under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 by KHA D
the abovementioned application.
"}
Date....l.
.
.&i;o.f. f..’_~,;":,,f.!!..:.~............................
NAME:
~//t.?~t:’Z/
//
Page 11
KHA Ref: 13015
SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL
LOCKED BAG 72
SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE QLD 4560
Dear Sir/Madam
LANDOWNER’S CONSENT
CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
2 NEPTUNE CIRCUIT, NOOSAVILLE
LOT 1 & 2 & COMMON PROPERTY ON BUP 100427
JEREMY JAMES HONEYMAN & DIANA MUNKMAN as owners of
CIRCUIT, NOOSAVILLE, described as LOT 2 ON BUP100427, hereby c
development application under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 by KHA D
the abovementioned application.
.!
1 J .
Date...ll
NAME:
’f/
’\,
"LI)I’V
t;,,’l-I (. 7
I
I
.’
’v
:.ty’l,4.//..v
_
.
.
YI
Page 12
KHA Ref: 13015
SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL
LOCKED BAG 72
SUNSHINE COAST MAIL CENTRE QLD 4560
Dear Sir/Madam
LANDOWNER’S CONSENT
CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
2 NEPTUNE CIRCUIT, NOOSAVILLE
LOT 1 & 2 & COMMON PROPERTY ON BUP 100427
THE BODY CORPORATE LA MAISON as owners of land at 2 NEPTUNE
described as COMMON PROPERTY ON BUP100427, hereby conse
development application under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 by KHA D
the abovementioned application.
5 ~(;/", ~/’! X:&...I(! Z
NAME.
If’ltfI
.
C/(7A’
""
_
.
1
Date .lL
/)
r
It/.-t!t/ki’’"1-1V
;//;.)0-
j ’11A
!
fr,l’ll/l! ^
Page 13
ATTA AP [OCR of page images] ATTACHMENT 3 APPROVED PLANS
Page 14
~ .
<c, .."si
j_~~
.
I
~
; ~I
~+ ~ ;~~: ,
IIIi ~I."...,i
iIi!
IiI
:8, 81
I
~I i’
.
!:<I ~
~’"...
:
r ’.1 -
600
i’l T
100 T
loa
tg
’9
6000 19 GNW; f 19
6000
6600
Trr
~ ii ~~"’0 :a~’ ~J 11E~
~7 TT 200 T
id/
p,oo" 200 l..l
I
200 IT
,.]75
2844
3000 2844
TT ~oo 200
4100
Jr ~o
JOOO
?f IT ~
4100
ISJO ~
1~
~Tl
~ I~’" f
IT ~11’ 70
1860 1M
2JS.:l
~.
r 8286
l’ft .<< on 19
IIS60 2J5O’
~ .-: .
[OCR of page images]
Impressed Contsact Sctivdule
Received oad Premium Pald
6600 : + 8
556
25) op _ 3 ms ic Pee ee ¢ SO al |
3090 1530 70 2350 1 t RMP b ERI
+ $1530 + + 3510 ri ; 4586 | pe , Receipt No,
11 2 1960 2? 97 2910 0 73 "0 a oe Binur
t t+ 200} $— 3 woo Pitas 04 rien AO eftiaaiow Re pe
+ 6000, eee 286 200 | co? 2 Rs Mh | Sighted
tf a aes bie concrete 4 4316 Rigs ene Ci Fernie
reinforced to engineers :
cea eae
. ; deta NOTE: DUAL FLUSH TOWET CISTERNS TO BE
i — wg gt = 8 INSTALLED WHEN BUILDING IS
j i bath 7 CONNECTED. T? NOOSA WATER
ay | taunory [7 | a & SUPPLY AS FIOM 1st JULY 1987.
a fh fig ea .
: f 8g ri | Bx 3 SS .
& 2 3 4 = mazes
s
‘ * Is nee f i
cee awe = z -[ 2 |i
T i gi mais i] c 4s wou eet ae Bett
' 3] | x structural i ati 31 possible tie
[ress A ii BED 3 DIING particleboard flooring : = ine Wat the ceriticates may
te hale. = ao mr iF “
Cae eae ce iS TT wet grde boo i | | a
get Fete SSE A PS 2 Leva 6 eu ahd.
Laer pm sft a pox ; 2 & 4 ae - F —
ee oe il NC ' ale [{ [Jom # : i E HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT {
’ i TBH GARAGE ¥ bai i i ‘ LA prt aaghey, ¥. ded that uhdor this Act th
fone isi! BED 3 OMI tts Fog 2 rae ig fou td He Ehavo fu tility for sly on this rope
Shiva | | g Slit { £ B gt cs 8 RED 4 fe tei int aPrincipal Connacte:
AG i Bie nes up DiC igs BS Leys ol | *§ Propiest aliice of
a ' “e ! iS 8 ¥xg] ~ UNDERSLAB TORE ane ot Prevention for
gy 3 ' as it 2et{8 el aD aaa: ih @ (07) 227, 4808,
| = L > : _—— 7 100x10n5 ms fJ SF vag / et
a & 3 sy doors A g tm IN po fae
| 5 g { ok { Es i Etats
g Rg . Ten | vb H sy
| 8 3 -E | peo are mu r4 § 3 8
a Be Se ole el 84 eet Bass Car cal 1 [ae reat
=| 3 ge LAUNORY { = 3.3 no \
2. #2 = | + 225 diam fc columns conerete
4 j g ee g an
a 225 diam tc columis concrete " ow " & 190070 Fd continaus ae eae eae
‘ filed ond reinforced to engineers * g]
detald
. 500 2 70 2 a
6000 200 70
+ it $ 8286 py — 2000 wo} $— 230 in 4316 1 2000 4
609 0 30 ! 530 is
iz + 4100 $f oo, zane 2000 3300 " 2400 ; 1846
boo 70 70 70
#44 ta 3000 1500_ 2389 3510 3970 4586 4
WORKING HOURS
¢——____ 5600. 1000 4—2000_ | oy 8556 i) 2000 |
“4 “ CONSTAUGTION WORK AND OTHER ASSOCIATED ACTIVITTE:
: es ARE PERMITTED ONLY DURING THE HOURS OF 7.00 ai
| FRAING SCHEDULE pepe Sire Se Rane Ne ce
ON SUN!
LNINS EXTENDED HOUNS ARE APPROVED BY THE BUILDIN’4
WALLS ~ EXTERNAL LOAD BEARING Mee ut ueaesea eo
LOWER FLOOR JOINERY S oard-{o wolls- of bathroom, w.c, ‘foundry
———— rae UPPER FLOOR JOINERY 70 x 38 studs at 450 centres, not natched for bracing bars
ee es SIE [Une stuns Wino | Size Tye] coméent | Hea Size [ume Stubs 2/70 x 38 top plates, 70-x 38 bottom plate bo
eee ae patio = ¥8 | 12002100 | Sliding ~__ [170570 Fitke [2770035 Fe Rae ort 10mm plosterboord thro 50 x 38 pine
BBE ye y x
2S | s00x600 Sliding ao eee Set} ———__| ea Fit | 2/7055 Fe WALLS, INTERNAL NON LOAD BEARING a ore os 1540
¥ 4 T 2100x3500] Sttding pee, alas Sl pores eent - 2 : 4.5 Versikx to all soffite on 50 x 38 Pine battens
WS | t2001 W11_ | 2100x3000 | St i¢ing ‘door = = 70 x 35 studs at 450 centres, may be notched for bracing ot 450 centres, 9 CHINE OF NCCSA
200 | St iding 70 x 3S top ond bottom plates, ond one mw nngging re Joct locompltance
6 | 12001800 | Stiding Thise'snand ypwcteaton ery be approved subse PATE
"7 [21003000 [$11 ling | load bearing wallt to be F14 wnseasoned thicknessad hardood AM the. tequirement of the Boling Act 18)
a a Al non toed bearing walls to be FS seasoned Rodiato cinesdmanta ta the Ast, Crepe pecan
Sra CRP Leakey { A fntels fo be F17kd hordrood hawa on the approved plant eatan be
MEMBER © Sane B 7 : Under e> clroumalancns may tho plan wad WEECT ORAS, Mt
So Say a Wag i ean AY framing to be in accordonce with Trodac Timber Froming ee at ibn
Cond, ay, Sorte, \ ad 3 Dail Chane & k Manual for W41 axporure Bi . re R
es MWe Nc wo ee Seus, claratres HOUSE DI
oka ol a Oordiod ter Aen SUITE 1% RALWAY SQUARE DIAWCSD STREET COOROY
Bas 257, COOROY —TELE?HONE 074477011
Coen BNisoy Noes
bulking designers Rion, AY, . ue 0
2 Immo haces) canmmsaa ce) Pad Kaba heas eo
RUMI PU AP tae ARM ate tmemnns cme em me o k aR enor a
Page 15
0 oJ 0 II) \oJ
SO TH NORm
fAST WEST
,-’’
,
.’’’’’"" ilVA10N EliVATION
.
.
3J5OI 2tr
. .. .
Ii< ..
[OCR of page images]
UG
i
uu
SUNSEEKER CLOSE
floshit oe ek
conceals tian
LJ Sova fick
NORTH WEST ELEVATION
oo
Cs flesting flashin
aI? onset Be
gransle of
equal finish
SOUTH EAST ELEVATION
2Tor ae
SITE PLAN scale 1:200
REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Let 173 on Registered Pion 845081
Parleh of Weyba
County of March
Site area 850 9q m
NORTH EAST ELEVATION
Henibitice over
Se
ei
ey cen fe.
SOUTH WEST ELEVATION
ee
concrete
at 330 nominal centres
Prefabric
oi
clipped to 50 x 38 F1* bottens
f trusses by specialist ot 900
to manufacturers specification
2440
slab ond footings in accordance
24
with Soil Test Engineers specification
Poison isnder slob to AS2057 ageinst
attack by Termites
cigpatad from
Duilcing Surveyor
dakeat None
ecting pert hERGLL?”
Se PCE oy
AmaumIA BPPeBeNCe Q%—3R1-—?
Page 16
ATTA PR [OCR of page images] ATTACHMENT 4 PROPOSAL PLANS
Page 17
,-----------------------
I
0
I
I
I
L ]
1 i=
CARPORT 1
1
1 II
1
______________J lJ
r-
L
J
r--- UNIT
r---
r---
r-
r---
r---
n
II
l II"
1 1 I I
’u III
II
J
II"
1 1 I 1
I I
~
I
r---
r-
r---
r---
r-
I---
UNIT
I
l
1
L_
--------------l Jl
~
~~ 1
I
II
~ 1 II
<<’ 1
Page 18
,---------------------------------1
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
r---------------J
I
I
NEW
STAIRS
I
L---------------l o
I
I
I
I
Page 19
1---------------------------------,
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
r---------------J
---------------l o
I
I
I
I
Page 20
I
I
-----------
~
~------ -
-1------
---_/
/
---
I
I =!.! = / /0
r----’1
---------
I
r" I /lL /
I // I 1 /
1 /
I
"" /
1
1 / (
/ 1
I 1 /
1
" I I 1 /
1 " //1 I ’=== 1 / 1
" / r 1
1 t--- 1 / 1
I "’BED /
/
1
)-----\ r---
r---
1 /
1
/ " /
1 " / ’t- r--- I / 1
"/ /
I " 1 1
o
I
Y
I
L D "
" II III 1 /
/
I
C"")
Ln I I
<0
1
A ~ D /
/
II III 1
"
"
L I
1 / 1 "
1
/ "
I / " -
t--- I " 1
" / "
" r--- 1
1 /13ED " ’1---( r---
I "
/ " t--- 1 " 1
1 / 1 r== " 1
/
", r
I 1 1 "
I 1 " 1
/ " 1
1 ,
1 / "
1 1
,
\.
1/
k ---------
L---~J I
1
I
j_
,
,
,
I
1
= =
,
’Q
-
_1_____-
------.__
1 V------ ,
1 "
I
-----------
-’ --
[OCR of page images]
6530
L 5200 [ 2430 [
no amendment: date
consultants: — i na
tructural ineer: Construction to comply with all Islet SMA location: project:
ee Sremerekene ae 2 NEPTUNE CIRCUIT ADDITIONS
eis cael Sone can aicatecese” | — | NOOSAVILLE
the of GREG GIBBS CTS. 3
sane Brasmen deta i 2 i oe dwg no: issue:
Geclece on g i a client: detail: 1269SK03
electrical engineer: 22 = J. HONEYMAN PROP[OSED CONDITIONS — [cae tate
rg e525 | G.WILD LEVEL 2 PLAN ne cea
designer: 5 583 GFA.
Page 21
/
I
I /
---"/’1 I /
/
I I
I (
I
I I
I
I I
I
I
)------l.. I
/ "
I
I
I
o
(")
lO
<D
/GFA36sm/
/~">< )----{
/
/~///’ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
"
I
I
I
\_
I
---~~ :
I
Page 22
NEW COLORBOND ROOFING
I ~
~~ TO MATCH EXISTING
~~~ IIII~~
. "
I. I _____
RENDERED + PAINTED CLADDING
.
. .’ .
.’.
_............v- TO MATCH EXISTING
----
" ........" "I
.
’.’.>
:,. :..:.:.,..: >.....:-:- .:..::._;;;--------
.
" ".
’..; ’:’.
~v ...----
~ ~
......._
’-.....__~
~ r-=
NORTH ELEVATION
NEW COLORBOND ROOFING
TO MATCH EXISTING
Used in these records
SUPERSEDED - Request for Change to Development Approval 51993.587.03Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 12.2 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.