Information response MCU12/0047

Information Required
2. Provide a plan of the existing and proposed stormwater drainage system. The plan for the
    proposed system must include a grease and oil arrestor or other stormwater quality improvement
    device for those areas ofthe driveway that are being re-Iaid


Response:
No new driveway is proposed as part of the subject application. The notation shown on plan
DAOO1.F, which did not relate to this application, has been removed. As such no change to the
existing stormwater system is proposed or required with the subject application.

Carparking

Issue
Council has concerns with the affect the proposed covered space for lot 1 (worksincluded in this MCU
application) and the proposed arbour and planting sited to the eastern bounda~ will have on the
manoeuvring space required to access the carparking for Units 2-11.

Information Required
3. Provide plans of the vehicle manoeuvring paths for vehicles entering and exiting the proposed
    carparking spaces for units 2-11. The plans must demonstrate:
    (a)     That vehicles can enter and exit the space between the existing columns:
    (b)     The vehicles must be a 899 vehicle as described in AS/NZS 2890.1:200~
    (c)     The manoeuvring paths must be in accordance with AS/NZS 2890.1:200~
    (d)     Include dimensions ofthe aisle.


Response:
The issue raised for manoeuvring is somewhat contrary to item 4 below which indicates that the
existing carparking situation includes 4 spaces are parallel to the eastern boundary that complv with
Australian Standards. The proposed covered space for Lot 1 does not change the location of the
existing parallel spaces acknowledged by Council as complying with Australian Standards. It is noted
that the car space cover is cantilevered as shown on plan DA.302F and will not have any impact upon
the existing situation. Amended plan DA.101G shows the dimension of the existing aisle between the
carparks and the covered unit 1 car space as 6.69m which exceeds the aisle width requirement under
AS/NZS 2890.1:2004. The proposed arbor does not form part of this application, which was clearly
indicated on the proposal plans and therefore is irrelevant to its assessment. For clarity purposes the
arbour opposite the carparks for units 2 6 has been removed
                                        -




Issue
Council considers there are 18 existing onsite car parking spaces, of which 14 spaces exist under the
building and 4 spaces are parallel to the eastern boundary that comply with Australian Standards. It
appears the proposal results in a net loss of 2 car spaces onsite as the arl:xJur has replaced 2 car
spaces.


Information Required
4. Provide amended plans indicating 18 car parking spaces on site. The car spaces must comply with
    AS/NZS 2890.1:2004.

Response:
As indicated above the proposed arbor does not form part of this application and has been removed
from the   plans for clarity purposes. The arbour is part of a separate change to development
application and should appropriately be considered with that application. Therefore no change to
existing carparking will result from the subject application.