Original source · versioned page text
16134ms.ms
Attached to the e-mail MCU13/0247.01Change to existing application.
the amended design either retains, or improves, the approved side
boundary setbacks;
the site cover of the original floors remains consistent with the approval while
the area of the additional floor is less than 9% of the total site area;
the extent of the proposed cut and fill will not exceed 2m in depth and
remains consistent with the recommendations of the Geotechnical
Investigation report prepared by Golder Associates; and
at least 20% of the site will continue to be provided as soft landscaping and
the layout continues to provide sufficient space for a 5m landscape buffer
to the rear boundary
The proposed amendments will result in a small part of the building being defined as three
storeys and will alter the roof profile. Both of these issues are discussed further below.
Building Height (Storeys)
As mentioned above, the small area associated with the proposed master bedroom
site will be defined as a third storey and as such, this element of the design is not
consistent the specific requirements of the Detached House Code. Nonetheless, it is
considered that it can be supported in this case for the following reasons:
the overall height of the building still complies with the Council’s
preferred maximum 8m height limit;
given the location of the three storey element, the dwelling will continue
to be read as a two storey building from Seaview Terrace and as such,
will continue to be consistent with the height of other properties within
the street;
it considered that the amended design will not alter the impacts that
the approved building will have on views, or vistas, from properties
adjoining the site or on the opposite side of Seaview Terrace as it
continues to comply with the maximum 8m height limit and also
complies with the minimum 2.5m side boundary setbacks sought for
those parts of the building above 7.5m;
it should be noted that a complying two storey building could be
designed to have the same, scale and mass as the current design
and as such, it is considered that any impacts on the adjoining
properties in terms of overshadowing and overlooking, will be
consistent with the expected outcomes of the Detached House
Code; and
December 2014 Bell Allen Holdings P/L – Permissible Change Request Page 4
56 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine Beach
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original