Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

16134ms.ms

Attached to the e-mail MCU13/0247.01Change to existing application.

of 5

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

     Drawing Description                                   Drawing          Rev     Drawing
                                                           No.                      Date
     Proposed 1st Floor Street Entry Level – Floor         5456 A-01        10      12.10.14
     Plan
     Proposed Ground Floor                                 5456 A-02        12      12.10.14
     Proposed 1st Floor Plan                               5456 A-03        04      15.12.14
     Proposed Roof & Site Plan                             5456 A-04        03      15.12.14
     Proposed Front Elevation                              5456 A-05        05      15.12.14
     Proposed RHS (South) Elevation                        5456 A-06        05      15.12.14
     Proposed Rear (East) Elevation                        5456 A-07        05      15.12.14
     Proposed LHS (North) Elevation                        5456 A-08        06      15.12.14

5.0      Sustainable Planning Act 2009
The proposed changes comply with the definition of a “permissible change” as defined in
section 367 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. The Act permits an assessment manager
to consider a change to an approval where the change is a “permissible change”. The
definition of "permissible change" is as follows:

       “1) A permissible change for a development approval, is a change to the approval
           that would not-

           (a) result in a substantially different development; or

           (b) if the application for the approval were remade including the change-
               (i) require referral to additional concurrence agencies; or
               (ii) for an approval for assessable development that previously did not
                    require impact assessment; or

           (c) for an approval for assessable development that previously required impact
               assessment- be likely, in the responsible entity’s opinion, to cause a person to
               make a properly made submission objecting to the proposed change, it the
               circumstances allowed; or

           (d) cause development to which the approval relates to include prohibited
               development”

The amended proposal is assessed against section (a), (b) and (d) of the definition below.
Section (c) is not relevant as the original application was code assessable.

a) Would not result in a substantially different development
For the following reasons, it is considered that the proposed amendments would not result in
the development being substantially different:

                the site will remain in residential use;

                the intensity of the use will continue to be consistent with a large residential
                property;

                the maximum height of the building will continue to be 8m. The issue
                associated with the number of storeys is discussed below;

                the front and rear setbacks remain consistent with the original approval;


December 2014                Bell Allen Holdings P/L – Permissible Change Request        Page 3
                                      56 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine Beach
Log in to download the original file

16134ms.ms.pdf · 253 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.