Original source · versioned page text
16134ms.ms
Attached to the e-mail MCU13/0247.01Change to existing application.
Drawing Description Drawing Rev Drawing
No. Date
Proposed 1st Floor Street Entry Level – Floor 5456 A-01 10 12.10.14
Plan
Proposed Ground Floor 5456 A-02 12 12.10.14
Proposed 1st Floor Plan 5456 A-03 04 15.12.14
Proposed Roof & Site Plan 5456 A-04 03 15.12.14
Proposed Front Elevation 5456 A-05 05 15.12.14
Proposed RHS (South) Elevation 5456 A-06 05 15.12.14
Proposed Rear (East) Elevation 5456 A-07 05 15.12.14
Proposed LHS (North) Elevation 5456 A-08 06 15.12.14
5.0 Sustainable Planning Act 2009
The proposed changes comply with the definition of a “permissible change” as defined in
section 367 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. The Act permits an assessment manager
to consider a change to an approval where the change is a “permissible change”. The
definition of "permissible change" is as follows:
“1) A permissible change for a development approval, is a change to the approval
that would not-
(a) result in a substantially different development; or
(b) if the application for the approval were remade including the change-
(i) require referral to additional concurrence agencies; or
(ii) for an approval for assessable development that previously did not
require impact assessment; or
(c) for an approval for assessable development that previously required impact
assessment- be likely, in the responsible entity’s opinion, to cause a person to
make a properly made submission objecting to the proposed change, it the
circumstances allowed; or
(d) cause development to which the approval relates to include prohibited
development”
The amended proposal is assessed against section (a), (b) and (d) of the definition below.
Section (c) is not relevant as the original application was code assessable.
a) Would not result in a substantially different development
For the following reasons, it is considered that the proposed amendments would not result in
the development being substantially different:
the site will remain in residential use;
the intensity of the use will continue to be consistent with a large residential
property;
the maximum height of the building will continue to be 8m. The issue
associated with the number of storeys is discussed below;
the front and rear setbacks remain consistent with the original approval;
December 2014 Bell Allen Holdings P/L – Permissible Change Request Page 3
56 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine Beach
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original