Council archive · source document
Operational Works Application OPW19-0033 · OPW19/0033
Very large file (15.9 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Noosa Council 2/20 Kauri Crescent PO Box 141 Peregian Springs Tewantin QLD 4573 QLD 4565 — | ter | 18 February 2019 Attention: Development Assessment Dear Sir/Madam, APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR OPERATIONAL WORKS - VEHICLE CROSSOVER, REMOVAL OF THREE (3) STREET TREES AND MINOR ROAD RESERVE ALTERATIONS ON LAND DESCRIBED AS LOT 175 ON SP115740 AT 205 BLUEBERRY DRIVE, BLACK MOUNTAIN, QLD 4563 Property Description: Lot 175 on SP115740 Property Address: 205 Blueberry Drive, Black Mountain, QLD 4563 Development Type: Operational Works for Vehicle Crossover, removal of three (3) street trees and minor road reserve alterations Local Government: Noosa Shire Council Planning Instrument: Noosa Plan (as amended 8 June 2018) Applicant: Anthony Wardrop and Emily Latham Please find enclosed our Application for Operational Works approval for the construction of a vehicle crossover, removal of three (3) street trees and minor road reserve alterations at the above site. A site visit was carried out on 5 November 2018 with Martin Sergas, Technical Officer — Road Reserves, Civil Operations, Noosa Council to discuss this application. This application comprises: 1. 2. 3. 6. This covering letter; Completed DA Form 1; Engineering drawings (layout plan and section) by Callaghan & Toth Engineers showing location of proposed vehicle crossover; Arboricultural Appraisal by Consult Arborist Pty Ltd. with commentary regarding the trees earmarked for removal; Email from Clint Bevan, Network Integrity Team, Telstra Operations regarding Telstra services; and Photographs showing before and after asbestos remediation works. The prescribed application fee of $478 will be paid to Council upon receipt of an application reference number. Page lof 4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 30 pages
Page 2
Background Considerable deliberation has been given to the location of the proposed vehicle crossover and other elements the subject of this application, taking into account site conditions/characteristics, the presence of existing services, and proposed house design. The proposed location has been discussed with Martin Sergas, our private engineer, certifier and building designer. This Operational Works application is required as: * the proposed driveway is considered ‘non-standard’ due to the existing site profile; and * proposed works include the removal of three (3) street trees; and * alterations to the profile of the nature strip is also proposed. Asbestos Removal In February 2018, pieces of asbestos sheeting were discovered which had been illegally dumped/hidden on Council’s nature strip at the front of the site. Initial testing and removal works were completed at our own cost. Further pieces were subsequently discovered, and Noosa Council then carried out additional removal works over an extensive area spanning 15 metres, and at considerable financial cost. (Please contact Eddie Stevens, Noosa Council for further information). The removal works included the removal of a depth of around 100mm of earth and vegetation in the problem area. Please refer to photographs attached to this application showing the affected area before and after the remediation works. Location As per attached engineering drawings, the location of the crossover has been chosen for the following reasons: ° To seal the area permanently: Upon completion, the vehicle crossover in this location would enable area to be sealed permanently by concrete/bitumen which would prevent the risk of any further asbestos sheeting pieces from coming to the surface in the future. The removal of the two street trees in this position are required to facilitate these works. These are referred to as ‘Tl’ in the attached Arboricultural Appraisal. * Excavation works are already partially complete: Council’s asbestos removal works required the excavation of approximately 100mm of top soil from the problem area. These works have in effect, begun the excavation required for a vehicle crossover in this location. * The underground services are the deepest in this location: The proposed location of the vehicle crossover is confirmed to be situated where the existing underground Energex and Telstra services are at the deepest location on the property frontage. This will facilitate the construction of the crossover with least disturbance. In addition, it has been concluded that there is no other location along the property frontage which doesn’t have some degree of conflict. The chosen location is positioned towards the western end of the property frontage. This is away from the intersection with Watergum Place so as to ensure that access/egress from both our property and Watergum Place will be uncompromised. Services The attached ‘Longitudinal Section’ drawing by Callaghan & Toth engineers, shows the proposed crossover being in conflict with the existing underground Telstra line position. As a result, the proposed works have been discussed with Clint Bevan (Network Integrity Team, Telstra), see email Page 2 of 4
Page 3
attached. Clint has advised the pipe will need to be lowered as per his email attached to this
application dated 30/01/19.
The excavation works for this purpose are required to span 15 metres either side of the proposed
driveway. As a result, we propose that the profile of the vehicle crossover is continued across the
full distance of the affected area {shown outlined in red within Figure 2 of the attached
‘Arboricultural Appraisal’). This will include battering the existing ground and levelling back to match
the proposed crossover profile. The area will then be re-turfed/seeded to re-establish grass
coverage.
These works will:
* facilitate the provision for ongoing mowing maintenance of the nature strip, by reducing the
gradient; and
* help to improve the street aesthetics, by re-establishing the grass cover in the subject area.
The grass in this area is currently non-existent or patchy at most.
Additional Street Tree Removal and Replacement Planting
Please refer to the Arboricultural Appraisal prepared by Matt Duncan at Consult Arborist Pty Ltd.
attached to this application. The two most westerly street trees (referred to as ‘T1’) are earmarked
for removal to facilitate the provision of a vehicle crossover in this location for the reasons given
above.
The third street tree is a Scribbly Gum, Eucalyptus racemose (referred to as ‘T2’), which is situated
within close proximity to the proposed new dwelling. The removal of this tree is required for the
following reasons:
* Safety: The site is in an elevated position and exposed to weather fronts as they permeate
the area. This tree is confirmed to be relatively mature and tall, and as such poses a safety
hazard to the proposed dwelling during periods of bad weather. In the interest of safety, it
is proposed that the tree is removed prior any additional growth, which could place a larger
threat to the future dwelling house.
* Vegetation coverage: There is currently poor grass coverage along the nature strip in the
location of street tree 3. This is partially due to street tree 3 in retaining the
moisture/nutrients from the ground. Removing this tree, and re-turfing/seeding the area
would give grass and vegetation a better chance to re-establish.
® Visibility: Removal will assist in providing clear lines of sight for access/egress of vehicles
into the site improving road and traffic safety.
° Damage: The works required to lower the Telstra pipe/cable will involve excavation in close
proximity to the gum tree and its root system. During these works, damage to the roots of
this tree may be unavoidable, thereby further justifying the need for its removal.
* Replacement Planting: It is accepted that any trees removed will be replaced with more
appropriate species in a more appropriate location. It is envisaged that this can be dealt
with via condition.
Summary
The location of the proposed driveway will:
° seal the ground permanently in an area which has contained asbestos sheeting;
* prevent the chance of any further pieces coming to the surface;
Page 3 of 4
Page 4
* be positioned where excavation works have already been completed as part of the removal works and where underground services are at their deepest; and * facilitate the replacement of more appropriate tree species in a more appropriate location. A wider area of the nature strip can be excavated at the same width as that required for lowering Telstra cable which will aid ongoing mowing maintenance. A third street tree is earmarked for removal for safety, to improve grass coverage, visibility and to being damaged from excavation works in close proximity. We therefore recommend Council issues Operational Works approval and we look forward to receiving Council’s favourable decision in due course. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours faithfully, Anthony Wardrop Phone: 0400 384 250 Email: [email protected] Page 4 of 4
Page 5
DA Form 1 — Development application details Approved form (version 1.1 effective 22 JUNE 2018) made under section 282 of the Planning Act 2016. This form must be used to make a development application involving code assessment or impact assessment, except when applying for development involving building work. For a development application involving building work only, use DA Form 2 — Building work details. For a development application involving building work associated with any other type of assessable development (i.e. material change of use, operational work or reconfiguring a lot), use this form (DA Form 1) and parts 4 to 6 of DA Form 2 — Building work details. Unless stated otherwise, all parts of this form must be completed in full and all required supporting information must accompany the development application. One or more additional pages may be attached as a schedule to this development application if there is insufficient space on the form to include all the necessary information. Note: Alf terms used in this form have the meaning given under the Planning Act 2016, the Planning Regulation 2017, or the Development Assessment Rules (DA Rules). PART 1 — APPLICANT DETAILS 1) Applicant details Applicant name(s) (individual or company full name) Anthony Wardrop and Emily Latham Contact name (only applicable for companies) Postal address (P.0. Box or street address) 2/20 Kauri Crescent Suburb Peregian Springs State Queensland Postcode 4573 Country Australia Contact number 0400 384 250 Email address (non-mandatory) [email protected] Mobile number (non-mandatory) As above Fax number (non-mandatory) Applicant's reference number(s) (if applicable) 2) Owner's consent 2.1) Is written consent of the owner required for this development application? KX No — proceed to 3) C1 Yes — the written consent of the owner(s) is attached to this development application Queensland
Page 6
PART 2 — LOCATION DETAILS 3) Location of the premises (complete 3.1) or 3.2), and 3,3).as applicable) Note: Provide: details below-and attach a site‘plan for any or all premises part of the development application: For further information: see DA Forms Guide. PP cilnci-iec-(e(o|xosiom-s ae telereie eyiel a, Street address AND lot on plan (ei! iots must be listed), or Street address AND lot on plan for an adjoining or adjacent property of the premises (appropriate for development in water but adjeining or adjacent to land e.g. jetty, pontoon; ail lots must be fisted). UnitNo. j Street No. | Street Name and Type Suburb ) - 205 Blueberry Drive Black Mountain a Postcode | Lot No. Plan Type and Number (e.g. RP. SP) Local Government Area(s) 4563 175 $P115740 Noosa Shire Council UnitNo. | StreetNo. | Street Name and Type Suburb b) Postcode | Lot No. Plan Type and Number (e.g. RP, SP) Local Government Area(s) 3 8} 6 cate annel dredging CHE gato! esi Car} et of coordinate ER ede af.coo p (1 Coordinates of premises by longitude and latitude Longitude(s) Latitude(s) Datum Local Government Area(s) ff applicable) C1 wess4 C1 cpaga 7] Other: (J Coordinates of premises by easting and northing Easting(s) Northing(s) Zone Ref. ; Datum Local Government Area(s) (if applicable) [154 Cl wese4 1155 (1 pasa L156 (J Other: 3.3) Additional premises (1 Additional premises are relevant to this development application and their details have been attached in a schedule to this application 1 Not required 4) Identify. any of the following that apply tothe premises and provide any relevant details (J In or adjacent to a water body or watercourse or in or above an aquifer Name of water body, watercourse or aquifer: N/A (1 On strategic port land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 Lot on plan description of strategic port land: N/A Name of port authority for the lot: N/A [J ina tidal area Name of local government for the tidal area (if applicable): N/A Name of port authority for tidal area (f appiicabie): N/A (J On airport land under the Airport Assets (Restructuring and Disposal) Act 2008 Name of airport: N/A Pann >
Page 7
(1 Listed on the Environmental Management Register (EMR) under the Environmental Protection Act 1994
EMR site identification: N/A
(1 Listed on the Contaminated Land Register (CLR) under the Environmental Protection Act 1994
CLR site identification: N/A
5) Are there any existing easements over the premises?
Note: Easement uses. vary throughout Seen endare to he st correctly and accurately, For further information.on easements and
how they may affect the proposed devel of O amelie?
[1] Yes — All easement ‘ovations. types and dimensions are included in plans submitted with this development
application
Xj No
PART 3 —- DEVELOPMENT DETAILS
Section 1 — Aspects of development
ee eeu eles cle tte ileieelcnics(0) elt seit ects Oo eee mee
a) What is the type of development? (tick only one box)
CO Material change of use (] Reconfiguring a lot [El Operational work (1 Building work
b) What is the approval type? (tick only one pox)
Development permit [7] Preliminary approval (1 Preliminary approval that includes
a variation approval
c) What is the level of assessment?
Code assessment (A tmpact assessment (requires public notification)
d) Provide a brief description of the proposal (e.g. 6 unit apartment building defined as multi-unit dwelling, reconfiguration of 1 lot into 3
lots}:
Proposed vehicle crossover, removal of three (3) street trees and minor road reserve alterations
e) Relevant plans
Note: Relevant plans are required to be submitted for all aspects of this development application. For further information, see DA Forms quide:
Relevant plans.
Relevant plans of the proposed development are attached to the development application
6.2) Provide details about the second development aspect
a) What is the type of development? (tick only ane box)
(1 Material change of use (J Reconfiguring a lot (J Operational work (1 Building work
b) What is the approval type? (tick only one box)
(J Development permit ( Preliminary approvai (7 Preliminary approval that includes a variation
approval
c) What is the level of assessment?
(7 Code assessment (J Impact assessment (requires public notification)
d) Provide a brief description of the proposal (e.g. 6 unit apartment building defined as multi-unit dwelling, reconfiguration of 1 tot into 3
Jots):
e) Relevant plans
Note: Relevant plans are required to be submitted for all aspects of this development application. For further information, see DA Forms Guide:
Relevant plans.
( Relevant plans of the proposed development are attached to the development application
Pann 2
Page 8
6.3) Additional aspects of development
( Additional aspects of development are relevant fo this development application and the details for these aspects
that would be required under Part 3 Section 1 of this form have been attached to this development application
EX] Not required
Section 2 — Further development details
2) Does the proposed development application involve any:of'the following?
Material change of use (1 Yes — complete division 1 if assessable against a local planning instrument
Reconfiguring a lot (1 Yes — complete division 2
Operational work Yes — compleie division 3
Building work (1 Yes — complete DA Form 2 ~ Building work details
Division 1 — Material change of use
Note: This division is only required to be completed if any part of the development application involves a material change of use assessable against a
local planning instrument.
SEP Bitoni ls\on th om 109) Ocal et ce cee et ois Se
Provide a general description of the Provide the planning scheme definition Number of dwelling Gross floor
proposed use (include each definition in a new row) units f applicable) area (m’)
(# applicable)
8:2) Does the proposed use involve the use of existing buildings on the premises? -
yes
[No
Division 2 ~ Reconfiguring a lot
Note: This division is only required to be completed if any part of the development application involves reconfiguring a lot.
9.1): What is the total number.of.existing lots making up.the premises?.
: 9.2) What is the nature. of the lot Ceonieie ene ie applicable boxes)
C1 Subdivision (complete 10)) (J Dividing tand into parts by agreement (complete 11))
(1 Boundary realignment (complete 12)) (1. Creating or changing an easement giving access to a lot
from a construction road (complete 13))
40):Subdivision :
10:1) For this development; how many lots are being: created:and whatis the intended use of those:lots:
Intended use of lots created Residential Commercial Industrial Other, please specify:
Number of lots created
10.2) Will the subdivision be staged?
(I Yes — provide additional detaiis below
[CINo
How many stages wil! the works include?
What stage(s) will this development application
apply to?
Maan 4
Page 9
11) Dividing land into parts by agreement — how many parts are being created and what is the intended use of the
parts? 5
Intended use of parts created | Residential Commercial | Industrial Other, please specify:
Number of parts created | |
42) Boundary realignment
12.1), What’are the current and proposed areas for.each lot comprising the.premises?
Current lot Proposed lot
Lot on plan description Area (m’) Lot on plan description Area (m*)
12.2) What is.the reason for the:boundary realignment?
13): What are the dimensions and nature of any existing easements. being changed:and/or any: proposed easement?
(Ge moerse RL B ee eC UL fen)
Existing or Width (m) | Length (m) | Purpose of the easement? ¢e.g. Identify the land/lot(s)
proposed? pedestrian access) benefitted by the easement
Division 3 — Operational work
Note: This division is only required to be completed if any part of the development application involves operational work.
14.1) Whatis.the nature.of the operational-work?
(1 Road work (1 Stormwater ( Water infrastructure
(1 Drainage work XX Earthworks C1 Sewage infrastructure
[Xj Landscaping C1 Signage Clearing vegetation
(1 Other — please specify: |
14.2) |s the operational work necessary to facilitate the creation of new lots? CepS eto
(1 Yes ~ specify number of new lots:
EI No
14.3) What is the monetary value of the. proposed operational work? (include GST, materials and /abour)
Approximately $10,000
PART 4 —- ASSESSMENT MANAGER DETAILS
Bre) Colusa ata: Pe onion manager(s) who willbe Peete) this development Eis diecitent
The local government — Noosa Shire Council
16) Has the local government agreed to apply a superseded planning. scheme for this development application?
(1 Yes —a copy of the decision notice is attached to this development application
(1 Local government is taken to have agreed to the superseded planning scheme request — relevant documenis
attached
No
Rane &
Page 10
PART 5 ~ REFERRAL DETAILS 17) Do any aspects of the osed development require referral for any referral requirements? iifelcmees pment application wil e referral if prescribed & No, there are no referral requirements relevant to any development aspects identified in this development application — proceed to Part 6 Matters requiring referral to the Chief Executive of the Planning Regulation 2017: ( Clearing native vegetation C] Contaminated land (unexploded ordnance) (_] Environmentally relevant activities (ERA) (only if the ERA have not been devolved to a local government) (1 Fisheries — aquaculture C Fisheries — declared fish habitat area (Co Fisheries — marine plants (1 Fisheries — waterway barrier works (7) Hazardous chemical facilities (1 Queensland heritage place (cn or near a Queensland heritage place) (1 Infrastructure — designated premises (1 infrastructure — state transport infrastructure (1 Infrastructure — state transport corridors and future state transport corridors (1 Infrastructure — state-controlled transport tunnels and future state-controlled transport tunnels (71 infrastructure — near a state-controlled road intersection (1 On Brisbane core port land near a State transport corridor or future State transport corridor (J On Brisbane core port land—ERA (1 On Brisbane core port land — tidal works or work in a coastal management district (1 On Brisbane core port land — hazardous chemical facility (] On Brisbane core port land — taking or interfering with water (1 On Brisbane core port land — referable dams (1 On Brisbane core port land - fisheries (1 Land within Port of Brisbane’s port limits (1 SEQ development area (SEQ regional landscape and rural production area or SEQ rural living area — tourist activity or sport and recreation activity (FJ SEQ regional landscape and rural production area or SEQ rural living area — community activity (1) SEQ regional landscape and rural production area or SEQ rural living area — indoor recreation (7) SEQ regional landscape and rural production area or SEQ rural living area — urban activity (I SEQ regional landscape and rural production area or SEQ rural living area — combined use (1 Tidal works or works in a coastal management district ( Reconfiguring a lot in a coastal management district or for a canal (C1 Erosion prone area in a coastal management district (1 Urban design (1 Water-related development — taking or interfering with water LJ Water-related development — removing quarry material trom a watercourse or lake) 7] Water-related development — referable dams [J Water-related development — construction of new levees or modification of existing levees (category 3 levees only) (J Wetland protection area Matters requiring referral to the local government: (Airport land (7 Environmentally relevant activities (ERA) (oniy if the ERA have been devolved to local government} (1 Local heritage places Paane
Page 11
Matters requiring referral to the chief executive of the distribution entity or transmission entity: CJ Electricity infrastructure Matters requiring referral to: * The Chief executive of the holder of the licence, if not an individual ¢ The holder of the licence, if the holder of the licence is an individual (J Oil and gas infrastructure Matters requiring referral to the Brisbane City Council: [1] Brisbane core port land Matters requiring referral to the Minister under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994: (1 Brisbane core port land (inconsistent with Brisbane port LUP for transport reasons) (] Strategic port land Matters requiring referral to the relevant port operator: (1) Land within Port of Brisbane’s port limits (below high-water mark) Matters requiring referral to the Chief Executive of the relevant port authority: (1 Land within limits of another port (below high-water mark) Matters requiring referral to the Gold Coast Waterways Authority: (J Tidal works, or work in a coastal management district in Gold Coast waters Matters requiring referral to the Queensland Fire and Emergency Service: (J Tidal works marina (more than six vessel! berths) 18) Has any referral agency provided a referral response for this development application? (1) Yes — referral response(s) received and listed below are attached to this development application No Referral requirement Referral agency Date of referral response N/A identify and describe any changes made to the proposed development application that was the subject of the referral response and the development application the subject of this form, or include details in a schedule to this development application (if applicable). N/A PART 6 — INFORMATION REQUEST 19) Information request under Part 3 ofthe DA Rules [I | agree to receive an information request if determined necessary for this development application (J 1 do not agree to accept an information request for this development application Note: By not agreeing to accept an information request |, the applicant, acknowledge: * that this development application will be assessed and decided based on the information provided when making this development application and the assessment manager and any referral agencies relevant to the development application are not obligated under the DA Rules to accept any additional information provided by the applicant for the development application unless agreed to by the relevant parties * Part 3 of the DA Rules will still apply if the application is an application listed under section 11.3 of the DA Rules. Further advice about information requests is contained in the DA Forms Guide. Dann 7
Page 12
PART 7 — FURTHER DETAILS 20) Are there any associated development applications or current approvals? (e.g. preliminary approval) C1 Yes — provide details below or include details in a schedule to this development application XI No List of approval/development Reference number Date Assessment application references manager CD Approval LD Development application LC Approval C1 Development application 21) Has the portable long service leave levy been paid? (only applicable to development applications involving building work or operational work) 1 Yes —a copy of the receipted QLeave form is attached to this development application (No —I, the applicant will provide evidence that the portable long service leave levy has been paid before the assessment manager decides the development application. | acknowledge that the assessment manager may give a development approval only if | provide evidence that the portable long service leave levy has been paid XI Not applicable (e.g. building and construction work is less than $150,000 excluding GST) Amount paid Date paid (dd/mm/yy) QLeave levy number $ 22) Is this development application in response to a show cause notice or required as a result of an enforcement notice? (1 Yes — show cause or enforcement notice is attached XI No 23) Further legislative requirements Environmentally relevant activities 23.1) Is this development application also taken to be an application for an environmental authority for an UN RUCLNM CAL im Celia (aia d-8 ltl \ foils MEMO Mla aig ice pig Clem fe ce ege meee’ ed (C1 Yes — the required attachment (form ESR/2015/1791) for an application for an environmental authority accompanies this development application, and details are provided in the table below KX] No Note: Application for an environmental authority can be found by searching “ESR/2015/1791" as a search term at www.gid.gov.au. An ERA requires an environmental authority to operate. See www_business gid gov. au for further information. Proposed ERA number: Proposed ERA threshold: Proposed ERA name: Oo Multiple ERAs are applicable to this development application and the details have been attached in a schedule to this development application. Hazardous chemical facilities 23.2) Is this development application for a hazardous chemical facility? (C1 Yes — Form 69: Notification of a facility exceeding 10% of schedule 15 threshold is attached to this development application XI No Note: See www.business.gid.gov.au for further information about hazardous chemical notifications. Clearing native vegetation 23.3) Does this development application involve clearing native vegetation that requires written confirmation that the chief executive of the Vegetation Management Act 1999 is satisfied the clearing is for a relevant purpose under Naan o
Page 13
section 22A of the Vegetation Management Act 1999? LJ Yes — this development application includes written confirmation from the chief executive of the Vegetation Management Act 1999 (s22A determination) No Note: 1. Where a development application for operational work or material change of use requires a s22A determination and this is not included, the development application is prohibited development. 2. See hitps/www_gid.gov.au/environmenthand/vegetation/applying for further information on how to obtain a s22A determination. Environmental offsets 23.4) Is this development application taken to be a prescribed activity that may have a significant residual impact on a prescribed environmental matter under the Environmental Offsets Act 2014? 1 Yes — | acknowledge that an environmental offset must be provided for any prescribed activity assessed as having a significant residual impact on a prescribed environmental matter No Note: The environmental offset section of the Queensland Govemment’s website can be accessed at www.qld.gov.au for further information on environmental offsets. Koala conservation 23.5) Does this development application involve a material change of use, reconfiguring a lot or operational work within an assessable development area under Schedule 10, Part 10 of the Planning Regulation 2017? 1 Yes XI No Note: See guidance materials at www.des.g/d.gov.au for further information. Water resources 23.6) Does this development application involve taking or interfering with underground water through an artesian or subartesian bore, taking or interfering with water in a watercourse, lake or spring, or taking overland flow water under the Water Act 2000? (1 Yes — the relevant template is completed and attached to this development application and | acknowledge that a relevant authorisation or licence under the Water Act 2000 may be required prior to commencing development XI No Note: Contact the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy at www.dnrme.gid.gov.au for further information. DA templates are available from https:/planning.dsdmip.gid.gov.au/. if the development application involves: * Taking or interfering with underground water through an artesian or subartesian bore: complete DA Form 1 Template 1 * Taking or interfering with water in a watercourse, lake or spring: complete DA Form1 Template 2 * Taking overland flow water: complete DA Form 1 Template 3. Waterway barrier works 23.7) Does this application involve waterway barrier works? C1 Yes — the relevant template is completed and attached to this development application No DA templates are available from httos://planning.dsdmip.gid.gov.au/. For a development application involving waterway barrier works, complete DA Form 1 Template 4. Marine activities 23.8) Does this development application involve aquaculture, works within a declared fish habitat area or removal, disturbance or destruction of marine plants? (1 Yes — an associated resource allocation authority is attached to this development application, if required under the Fisheries Act 1994 KX] No Note: See guidance materials at www.daf.qid .gov.au for further information. Quarry materials from a watercourse or lake 23.9) Does this development application involve the removal of quarry materials from a watercourse or lake under the Water Act 2000? (1 Yes — 1 acknowledge that a quarry material allocation notice must be obtained prior to commencing development XI No naan 0
Page 14
Note: Contact the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy at www.dnrme.gid.gov.au and www.business.gid.gov.au for further information. Quarry materials from land under tidal waters 23.10) Does this development application involve the removal of quarry materials from land under tidal water under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995? (1 Yes —! acknowledge that a quarry material allocation notice must be obtained prior to commencing development XI No Note: Contact the Department of Environment and Science at www.des.g/d.gov.au for further information. Referable dams 23.11) Does this development application involve a referable dam required to be failure impact assessed under section 343 of the Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 (the Water Supply Act)? C1 Yes — the ‘Notice Accepting a Failure Impact Assessment from the chief executive administering the Water Supply Act is attached to this development application KX] No Note: See guidance materials at www.dnrme.qid_.gov.au for further information. Tidal work or development within a coastal management district 23.12) Does this development application involve tidal work or development in a coastal management district? C1 Yes — the following is included with this development application: C1 Evidence the proposal meets the code for assessable development that is prescribed tidal work (only required if application involves prescribed tidal work) LIA certificate of title XI No Note: See guidance materials at www.des.gid.gov.au for further information. Queensland and local heritage places 23.13) Does this development application propose development on or adjoining a place entered in the Queensland heritage register or on a place entered in a local government's Local Heritage Register? (1 Yes — details of the heritage place are provided in the table below IX] No Note: See guidance materials at www.des.g/d.gov.au for information requirements regarding development of Queensiand heritage places. Name of the heritage place: Place ID: TCs 23.14) Does this development application involve a material change of use for a brothel? (1 Yes - this development application demonstrates how the proposal meets the code for a development application for a brothel under Schedule 3 of the Prostitution Regulation 2014 XI No Decision under section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 23.15) Does this development application involve new or changed access to a state-controlled road? U1 Yes - this application will be taken to be an application for a decision under section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (subject to the conditions in section 75 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 being satisfied) XI No PART 8 — CHECKLIST AND APPLICANT DECLARATION Pann 4n
Page 15
24) Development application checklist
| have identified the assessment manager in question 15 and all relevant referral
requirement(s) in question 17 Yes
Note: See the Planning Regulation 2017 for referral requirements
If building work is associated with the proposed development, Parts 4 to 6 of DA Form 2-— [Yes
Building work details have been completed and attached to this development application KX Not applicable
Supporting information addressing any applicable assessment benchmarks is with
development application
Note: This is a mandatory requirement and includes any relevant templates under question 23, a planning report Kl Yes
and any technical reports required by the relevant categorising instruments (e.g. local government planning
schemes, State Planning Policy, State Development Assessment Provisions). For further information, see DA
Forms Guide: Planning Report Template.
Relevant plans of the development are attached to this development application
Note: Relevant plans are required to be submitted for all aspects of this development application. For further Ki Yes
information, see DA Forms Guide: Relevant plans.
The portable long service leave levy for QLeave has been paid, or will be paid before a OYes
development permit is issued (see 21)) KX Not applicable
25) Applicant declaration
[XJ By making this development application, | declare that all information in this development application is true and
correct
{Xl Where an email address is provided in Part 1 of this form, | consent to receive future electronic communications
from the assessment manager and any referral agency for the development application where written information is
required or permitted pursuant to sections 11 and 12 of the Electronic Transactions Act 2001
Note: it is unlawful to intentionally provide false or misleading information.
Privacy — Personal information collected in this form will be used by the assessment manager and/or chosen
assessment manager, any relevant referral agency and/or building certifier (including any professional advisers
which may be engaged by those entities) while processing, assessing and deciding the development application.
All information relating to this development application may be available for inspection and purchase, and/or
published on the assessment manager's and/or referral agency’s website.
Personal information will not be disclosed for a purpose unrelated to the Planning Act 2016, Planning Regulation
2017 and the DA Rules except where:
* such disclosure is in accordance with the provisions about public access to documents contained in the Planning
Act 2016 and the Planning Regulation 2017, and the access rules made under the Planning Act 2016 and
Planning Regulation 2017; or
* required by other legislation (including the Right to Information Act 2009); or
* otherwise required by law.
This information may be stored in relevant databases. The information collected will be retained as required by the
Public Records Act 2002.
PART 9 — FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date received: [sd Reference number(s): [ |
Notification of engagement of alternative assessment manager
Prescribed assessment manager
Name of chosen assessment manager
Date chosen assessment manager engaged
Contact number of chosen assessment manager
Relevant licence number(s) of chosen assessment
manager
QLeave notification and payment
Rana 44
Page 16
Note: For completion by assessment manager if applicable Description of the work QLeave project number Amount paid ($) Date paid Date receipted form sighted by assessment manager Name of officer who sighted the form Daan ia
Page 17
Page 18
[DRIVEWAY CROSSOVER TO|
NC STD OWG 9005
[EXISTING ENERGEX LOCATED
AT 0.8en-1,0m COVER
EXISTING TELSTRA TO BE|
LOWERED TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM|
0.3m COVER}
CURVE TO NC
NATURAL SURFACE]
[BATTER BACK TO NATURAL.
SURFACE AT 4,
PROPOSED GARAGE
MINIMUM FFL 161.100
(05 APPROX
STD DWG 9019
E
S| 7.8% 49.3% 25,00%| 12.50% 0.0%
DATUM RL 157,000
= x
rr a g
CUT/FILL (+=CUT) 2 s 2 s ¢
ee 5 a B
NEW DRIVEWAY LEVEL | &) | 3 g 3 2 &
Ses
23 2 ay} 00CUR 3
| asl 3 g ae] =z 3
SURFACE LEVEL ae # = 3 2
aig g 3 esl =
S| o| ol] | So ea ct}
CHAINAGE
(Callaghan & Toth )
Environmental &
| Hydraulic Engineers
goals Bat
\ 8/41 Sunshine Beach Rood
FS
‘COMPUTER DIRECTORY
FOR APPROVAL
Shect 2 of 2 sheate
drawing number
1901-02
dots _18th JANUARY 2019 JS
Page 19
ARBORICULTURAL Address: Commissioned by: Project: Date: Prepared by: TODAY’S TREES FOR TOMORROW APPRAISAL 205 Blueberry Drive Black Mountain, QLD, 4563 Mr Anthony Wardrop Driveway and Road Reserve Configuration 7/02/2019 Matthew Duncan Director / Principal Arborist AQF Level V, TRAQ, QMQAA e: [email protected] m: 0450 355 770 ABN: 68 153 548 531
Page 20
Consult Arborist This document was prepared for the sole use of the client, Mr Anthony Wardrop and any regulatory agencies involved in this project. No other party should rely on this information without the prior written consent of Consult Arborist. The findings laid out in this report are valid for 12 months from the date of the assessment. If the advice and recommendations made in this report are not strictly adhered to, no responsibility will be taken for the continuing health and condition of retained trees. Trees are dynamic living organisms that respond to changes in their environs; repeat assessments are key to maintaining tree vitality, structural integrity and to reduce any potential risk they may pose. COPYRIGHT This report/document is subject to copyright laws and penalties @280c per word per incident, no part may be reproduced or used without the written permission of Consult Arborist Pty Ltd. No responsibility will be accepted by Consult Arborist Pty Ltd for unauthorised or partial use of this report. General Permission of use as subject to Consult Arborist Pty Ltd copyrights: 1. Customer permission: No more than three hard copies to exist at any one time. 2. Customer email permissions: Must be original PDF format and limited to agreed Parties with direct and vested interest in the case. DOCUMENT CONTROL The latest approved version of this 19_02_07_AA 205 Blueberry Drive should be available to all relevant personnel in consultation with Consult Arborist Pty Ltd. Each new revision should be distributed to all key personnel for review and endorsement. All individuals working near protected trees are to be made aware of this document and it is the responsibility of the individual to implement and/or adhere to the recommendations and guidelines. 19 02_07_AA_205 Blueberry Drive
Page 21
Consult Arborist TABLE OF CONTENTS Copyright Document Control 2.0.2... eee eecececccecceceeeeeeeseeeeeeeseeeseeseaeeeaeeesueeeaaeeasesaeeseseneeeseeeenseeneeeseeseeeea 2 1 2 3 4 5 5.3 Arboricultural Proposal.............cecccececeeceseeseceesesesesseeeescscesseeeesseeseeeseeaseeeeeeeeaeaeeeeaes g GB REFEFENCES! oe. eee cece eeececeesceneeeeeeseeaeeeecaeeeceesececaeeaetssesaeesetsesaeseeesaeesteeeseetseseeesaeesetensess 10 7 Assumptions and Disclaimer .............ccccceccecceceeceeeeeceeeeeeseeeeceeeseeseseeseseeeesaeeseessenesteessseaes 10 Ppp 1 Ceti TB rca cacnssnessnearsseonacncasnenenceenascaunncewexsic macanatenex silences 11 19_02_07_AA_ 205 Blueberry Drive Page 3 of 11
Page 22
Consult Arborist 1 RIEF mi W This report was commissioned by, Anthony Wardrop the property owner in January 2019. Consult Arborist Pty Ltd has been requested to carry out an independent Arboricultural Appraisal and provide arboricultural advice regarding the Noosa Council street trees located on the frontage of the site, 205 Blueberry Drive, Black Mountain. The aim of this report is to provide information on the current condition of the trees and to assess their suitability for future retention taking into consideration the proposed works, tree species and future use/occupancy of the site. This report is to be used as supporting information for the Noosa Council Operational Works application to undertake minor earthworks and the construction of a driveway. Matthew Duncan, the Director and Principal Arborist of Consult Arborist, undertook the Visual Tree Assessment of the site from a ground level on Friday, 1 February 2019. Matthew holds an AQF Level 5 (AHC50510) Diploma in Arboriculture, an International Society of Arboriculture’s Tree Risk Assessment Qualification 2015 and has worked in the arboricultural industry since 1994. Since its establishment in 2011, Consult Arborist has been engaged to provide arboricultural advice and guidance on private, civil and capital works projects from cross-sector clients throughout SEQ. 3 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS A basic Visual Tree Assessment was performed on the subject trees to determine their health, structure and suitability for retention within their current surroundings. This included a visual assessment of the surrounding area and the subject tree’s structure and health, from a ground level. It includes the use of basic tools and techniques, i.e. cavity probing, minor root collar excavation, measuring tapes and devices and photography to gather information. The timeframe for this report is the inspection period; re-inspection should occur 1 year from this inspection. No additional specialist equipment was used, no conclusive comments on what may have or may be happening within the internal structure of the tree will be made. No tissue or soil samples have been collected or submitted for testing. The information contained in this report is based on a visual inspection of each tree and its location, species, health and condition at the time of inspection unless otherwise stated. It is the author's opinion and is a ‘snapshot in time’ of the specific tree's health and condition at the time of the inspection and no guarantee can be given that faults or issues may not arise in the future. The relevant tree information has been recorded to be used as a functional proactive tool to determine a safe management strategy for the trees, taking into account past works, site activities, age and location. See Site Plans and photographs for tree locations. 19_02_07_AA 205 Blueberry Drive Page 4 of 11
Page 23
A < SITE DESCRIPTION AND FINDINGS ¢ The three subject trees referred to in this report are identified as T1 and T2. T1 includes a planted Giant Water Gum, Syzygium francisii, and a self-seeded Wattle, Acacia species, located towards the western side of the site and directly on the alignment of the proposed driveway. T2 is a planted Scribbly Gum, Eucalyptus racemosa, positioned centrally adjacent the Lot frontage towards the toe of the batter that makes up the sloping road reserve. The Lot is vacant and was recently purchased with the view to constructing a residential dwelling towards the front of the site. The rear/northern section of the site slopes steeply down to a stormwater catchment area and creek. | have been advised the steepness of the road reserve slope is beyond the planning standards and is currently non-compliant. In the past, a quantity of asbestos was dumped on the site. The owner and Noosa Council have both on differing occasions acted to remove the asbestos, but | was informed that small pieces can still be found on the site. During the asbestos removal process turf and soil from around T2 was removed by Noosa Council exposing and impacted the tree's surface root system. Damaged and exposed roots can still clearly be seen on site. These works have also led to minor erosion and with sub- soil/rock exposed is preventing the establishment of turf. On approaching Noosa Council, the owner has been advised that a driveway on a non- standard alignment would not be approved and that the driveway should be positioned towards the western side of the property at 90 degrees to the kerb, rather than angled, and not to be opposite the junction with Watergum Place. With the site to be used as a long-term family residence, the owner seeks to undertake works to rectify the steep non-compliant road reserve so that is safe to maintain. These works would require the removal of the ridge that runs along the frontage of the site. The site currently slopes steeply from the kerb up to the property boundary and then slopes down the length of the Lot to the north. The proposal by the owner is to reduce the ridge the create a more level frontage to the site thus reducing the slope to the road reserve. As part of these works, the underground services are to be repositioned and the area landscaped/turfed. 19_02_07_AA_205 Blueberry Drive — Page 5 of 11 Consult Arborist
Page 24
Consult Arborist 4.1 Site PLANS Plans are not to scale and is to be used in conjunction with the information within this assessment results. Figure 1: Google site plan overview \ a9 a6, \ ONSITE SEWERAGE Ooszst TREATMENT POSITION TO BE CONFIRMED ON SITE 8507 wall | x Figure 2: Site plan extract showing the subject trees and proposed dwelling and driveway design. 19_02.07_AA 205BlueberryDrive = sssSsS~S "Page 6 of 11
Page 25
Consult Arborist Site Topography [Earth works 9 Picture 1: Site overview with proposed earthworks to reduce the ridge in orange 19_02_07_AA_ 205 Blueberry Drive Page 7 of 11
Page 26
Consult Arborist 5 ARBORICULTURAL APPRAISAL 5.1 11 Tree 1 is a combination of two plants growing from the same location and incorporates an establishing Giant Water Gum, Syzygium francisii, and a self-seeded Wattle, Acacia species. Both of these trees are directly located within the path of the proposed driveway and have had the ground scrapped around them to remove the asbestos in the past. Picture 2: Trees 1 and Driveway alignment Picture 3: Tree 2 and minor earthworks 5.2 72 Tree 2 is an early-mature planted Scribbly Gum, Eucalyptus racemosa, in the past works to remove the asbestos has removed turf and soil from the tree's root zone with exposed roots remaining. These works do not appear to have caused the tree harm at this stage, however the effects of root damage can manifest over a number of years rather than months. The proposed minor earthworks the reduce the ridge and slope are likely to intrude on the tree to depth, up to an estimated 40% of the tree's calculated root zone of 3.6m radius. This level of encroachment is not recommended and is contrary to AS4070-2009 Protection of trees on development sites. If retained, and knowing the species habits, it is likely that this tree will cause its own issues for the residents living adjacent to it, including continuous debris drop and sporadic and unpredictable branch failure that increases over time as the tree ages. It will also develop a root system that is likely to cause damage to the kerb and channel in the coming years. The poor/shallow soils found on the cut of the road reserve will not support a deep rooting system and only promote surface spreading roots. 19_02_07_AA_205 Blueberry Drive Page 8 of 11
Page 27
Consult Arborist 5.3 ARBORICULTURAL PROPOSAL To complete the proposed works described above trees, T1 and T2 will be directly impacted rendering them unsuitable for retention and thus requiring removal. It is proposed that trees T1 and T2 are removed to due past root interference, design conflict and road reserve reconfiguration. Replacement trees should be planted after the earthworks have been completed. Due to the nature of the shallow soils, it is recommended that oversized planting pits should be excavated and filled with quality topsoil to provide the new trees with the best opportunity to establish and flourish. The suggested replacement tree species are offered to continue the current streetscape theme and should be planted on the standard alignment 1000-1500mm behind the kerb with the final positioned to be confirmed. 2 x 300mm / 451 pot size: Giant Water Gum, Syzygium francisii Brush Box, Lophostemon confertus 19_02_07_AA 205Blueberry Drive ~ Page 9 of 11
Page 28
Consult Arborist 6 REFERENCES: Australian Standards AS 4373 — 2007 Pruning of amenity trees ISA Tree Risk Assessment Wild Plants of Greater Brisbane — Queensland Museum Noosa’s Native Plants — Stephanie Haslam, Second Edition Evaluating Tree Defects — A Field Guide by Ed Hayes, Second Edition Body Language of Trees - Research for Amenity Trees, Claus Mattheck Smiley E. Thomas, Nelda Matheny and Sharon Lilly April 2012. Tree Risk Assessment: Levels of Assessment Matheny Nelda and Jim Clark Feb 2009. Tree Risk Assessment: What we know (and What we Don’t Know) 7 ASSUMPTIONS AND DISCLAIMER This information contained in this report has been prepared on an independent basis, free of any bias and represents the honest opinion of the consulting arborist. All data is based on visual inspection of the tree/s and its/their location at the time of writing, unless otherwise stated, and contains opinions, advice and recommendations based on information and data gathered from site inspections carried out by the author and information supplied by the Client (Anthony Wardrop). All information received from the Client shall be deemed to be true, accurate and up to date. To the extent permitted by law, you agree Consult Arborist Pty Ltd is not liable to you or any person or entity for any loss of or damage caused or alleged to have been caused (including loss or damage resulting from negligence) either directly or indirectly, by your use of the information made available in this report. In no event will the author be liable to you for any lost revenue or profits, or for special, indirect, consequential or incidental damage (however caused and regardless of the theory of liability) arising out of or related to your use of that information, even if the author has been advised of the possibility of such a loss or damage. Consult Arborist cannot be held responsible for the effects of non-conformance works performed, by unsuitably qualified staff or without the supervision of Consult Arborist. Unless otherwise stated this report cannot be used within a court of law or any legal situation without the prior consent of Consult Arborist Pty Lid. The author shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements have been made. The information contained in this report refers only to the tree/s that were inspected on 1/02/2019 and reflects the condition of the tree/s at the time of the inspection. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that the problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. Likewise, remedial treatments cannot be guaranteed. Arboriculturalists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Consult Arborist Pty Ltd and the author cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. This report does not take into consideration the possibility of extreme weather or other events over which Consult Arborist Pty Ltd has no control. Treatment, pruning and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the Arboriculturalists services, such as property boundaries and ownership, disputes between neighbours, sight lines, landlord-tenant matters and related. Consult Arborist Pty Ltd cannot take such issues into account unless the complete and accurate information is given to them. Likewise, Consult Arborist Pty Ltd cannot accept any responsibility for the authorization or non-authorization of any recommended treatment or remedial measure. Arboriculturalists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live or work near a tree involves some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risks associated with a tree is to eliminate the tree. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of Consult Arborist Pty Ltd or to seek additional advice. 19_02_07_AA_205 Blueberry Drive Bagge 10 of “Page 10 of 14
Page 29
Consult Arborist
APPENDIX 1 ~ DEFINITION OF TERMS
The following criteria have been used in the report to gather information and determine the required management
options on the grounds of public health and safety. Measurements are approximate and made visually by eye
unless otherwise stated.
Young: Early stage of growth, immature size, established
Early Mature: Fast growing well-established tree which has not yet reached mature size
Mature: The tree reached its mature size, exhibits slowing growth rates with early stages of naturally forming dead
or dysfunctional wood.
Over Mature: The tree has reached maiure size and is unlike to increase significantly in height or mass. Retrenchment of
the upper crown with increased vegetative vitality in lower crown, increased fungal activity and wood decay,
increase colonisation by flora and fauna.
Veteran: Tree with advanced retrenchment, a reduced crown size and annual increment growth, extensive hollowing,
crown collapse, low vigour, advance heartwood advanced colonisation by fauna and flora.
Good: | | Tree with no defects or disorders which are notable. Full canopy with good colour foliage. Minimal pathogen
damage.
Fair: Tree with minor defects or disorders which are notable. Some deadwood within what can be an unbalanced
canopy, foliage generally with good colour although some discolouration may be present typical of species
in location. Minor pathogen damage.
Poor: Tree with major defects or disorders which are notable. The tree has considerable deadwood present,
discoloured or distorted leaves indicating a further decline of the tree. Detrimental pathogen damage.
Dead or dysfunctional moribund tree.
Good: Tree with good unions and no branch defects. Sound trunk with no / minor defects. Good buttress and root
structure.
Fair: Tree with minor defects or disorders which are notable. Small areas of bark missing. Small cavities or minor
unfavourable branch unions may be present. Minor damage fo roots.
Poor: Tree with major defects, large hollows, weak unions and/or problematic damaged roots.
Hazardous: This implies a tree with a major defect that may fail at any time
This retention val mes from the Institute of Australian Consulting Arborists (ACA), 2010, IACA Significance of a Tree,
Assessment Rating System (STARS), Institute of Australian Consulting Arboriculturists, Australia, www.iaca.org.au -
http://www. iaca.org.au/home/index.php/publications/71-stars
The process uses the Retention Value — Priority Matrix by assessing the Tree Significance Assessment Criteria and crossing
it with the Estimated Life Expectancy to determine the following ratings:
High: Priority for Retention
These trees are considered important for retention and should be retained and protected. Design
modification or relocation of building/s should be considered to accommodate the setbacks as prescribed by
the Australian Standard AS4970 Protection of trees on development sites. Tree sensitive construction
measures must be implemented e.g. pier and beam etc. if works are to proceed within the Tree Protection
Zone.
Medium: Consider for Retention
These trees may be retained and protected. These are considered less critical; however, their retention
should remain a priority with removal considered only if adversely affecting the proposed building/works and
ail other altematives have been considered and exhausted.
Low: Consider for Removal
These trees are not considered important for retention, nor require special works or design modification to
be implemented for their retention.
Remove: Priority for Removal
These trees are considered hazardous, or in irreversible decline, or weeds and should be removed
irrespective of development.
” Diameter at Breast Height - The approximate diameter of the trunk is measured visually in millimetres ata
height of 1.4m.
19_02_07_AA_205 Blueberry Drive Page 11 of 11
Page 30
205 Blueberry Drive Operational Works Application Email from Clint Bevan, Network Integrity Team, Telstra Operations regarding Telstra services: From: "Bevan, Clint" <Clint.N.Bevan@team telstra.com> Subject: Lowering Telstra assets for driveway at 205 Blueberry Drive Black mountain. Date: 30 January 2019 at 9:17:42 AM AEST To: Anthony Wardrop <[email protected]> Hi Anthony, please feel free to pass this email and my contact details on to council or other stake holders to assist in your development application. After studying the supplied plans | am of the opinion that the Telstra conduit/s will have to be lowered to obtain the required cover under the proposed driveway. As discussed | would suggest that you first have the bulk earth works completed. That will give us final excavation levels to work from. Once this is done we will know how much lowering work is required and | can arrange for quote accordingly. Care will need to be taken when excavating and exposing the Telstra conduit. Above the Telstra conduit, the survey plan (Callaghan & Toth drawing No1901-1) indicates a 4.5mt wide driveway with an additional batter on each side of approx imt. To obtain our required cover | would expect that we will excavate and undermine our conduit for a distance of approx 30mt (15mt each side of centres). The order of events would be 1. Bulk excavations done, 2. Telstra lowers network, 3.driveway constructed. To lodge a project with Telstra, please fill out the attached and email it to the highlighted address on the form. You Cc me in as well. Please pass on the expected timing of works when known. Telstra has no objection to you proceeding with the driveway excavation with the understanding that the conduit will be lowered prior to construction of the driveway. Regards Clint Bevan Mob 0408 155 652 sh Netvork integrity Team Network Construction Services Telstra Operations. 36 King St, Caboolture 4510. PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS E-MAIL! Page lofi
Page 31
205 Blueberry Drive, Black Mountain Operational Works Application — Photographs Photographs Before Asbestos Remediation Works Photographs After Asbestos Remediation Works
Used in these records
Operational Works Application OPW19-0033.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 15.9 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.