Council archive · source document
01. Hales - DA Form 1, Authority to Act, SDAP module · OPW20/0118
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
navigation, an aid to navigation management plan is required.
AND
AO2.3 Development keeps sight lines of any aids to Complies with AO2.3
navigation which cross the land clear of obstructions. The proposal does not interfere with sight lines of
any aids to navigation.
Note: Where development has the potential to obstruct the line of
sight to aids to navigation or interfere with the functioning of aids to
navigation, an aid to navigation management plan is required.
AND
AO2.4 Development ensures ongoing access to aids Complies with AO2.4
to navigation for maintenance purposes. The proposal does not interfere with access to
aids to navigation.
AND
AO2.5 Development does not result in electrical or Complies with AO2.5
electro-magnetic emissions which may impede the The proposal is not designed to result in electrical
operation of aids to navigation. or electro-magnetic emissions which may impede
the operation of aids to navigation.
Protection of navigable waterways
PO3 Development does not impede the safe AO3.1 Development ensures navigable waterways Complies with AO3.1
movement of vessels in a navigable waterway. are open to vessel traffic at all times. The jetty proposal is positioned at the appropriate
quay line and does not interfere with
AND vessel traffic in this section of the canal.
The boundary wall is located within the freehold
property.
AO3.2 Development, including structures and any Complies with PO3
vessel berthed at the structures: The proposed jetty and associated vessel do not
1. does not encroach into, pass over or under a extend into the navigation corridor. Further, the
navigation corridor; or proposal is not located in a high risk maritime
2. is not located in a high risk maritime development development zone. See plans for positioning
zone. details.
Note: Navigation corridor and high risk maritime development zone
layers are currently unavailable for Gold Coast waters.
AND
AO3.3 Development does not limit either the depth of Complies with AO3.3
a navigable waterway or the size of vessels which can The proposal does not alter the depth of the
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.4
State code 7: Maritime safety Page 2 of 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
01. Hales - DA Form 1, Authority to Act, SDAP module.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.