Original source · versioned page text
Negotiated Report (Representations made) 131998 981211 5
b. adequate manoeuvring about the intersection for a 12.5m and 14.5 rigid vehicle, so
that no part of the rigid vehicles exits the traffic lane(s); and
c. widening of Kabi Road in accordance with Condition 97.
Applicant’s Request
The applicant has not proposed to amend Condition 96 however seeks clarification on how
Condition 96 is to be administered with respect to Condition 12 of the original approval.
Assessment of Request
Condition 12 was imposed as part of the original golf course approval and required the payment of
a contribution towards external works in the area. This contribution would have been paid when
the original use commenced circa 2005 and the contribution used for works in the area.
Condition 96 relates to upgrades to the Kabi Road intersection which are necessitated by the
current proposals to increase the use on the site. No justification or changes were provided by the
applicant and no change is recommended to Condition 96.
Recommendation
It is recommended existing condition 96 remain unchanged and condition 12 be amended to refer
to the original golf course use as follows:
12. A contribution toward roadworks external to the development site in the Cootharaba Road
catchment shall be paid prior to the commencement of the Integrated Permaculture Designed
Organic Orchard and Golf Course Complex. The amount of the contribution as at September
1999 is $100,000 and shall be subject to changes in the Consumer Price Index, All Groups
Brisbane, up until the date of payment.
Condition 97
97. Kabi Road must be upgraded for the full length of the road (i.e., between 59 Kabi Road and
Cootharaba Road). The works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works
approval, be generally in accordance with Austroads’ A Guide to Road Design Part 3, sections 5,
6 and 8 of BMC Traffic’s Traffic Engineering Assessment Report (Doc ID: 22354477) dated 22
March 2023, The Noosa Plan 2020 – PSP6 Engineering Design Standards, and include, but not
be limited to:
a. a design prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ)
b. combined traffic lane width of 6.2m (2 x 3.1m);
c. a shoulder width of 1.0m (with a minimum shoulder sealed width of 0.5m);
d. a pavement design suitable to cater for heavy vehicles (i.e.,rigid vehicles, buses, etc.);
e. all associated drainage infrastructure (i.e., table drain, culvert, etc.);
f. the continuation of the existing stormwater box culvert to allow for the require carriageway width;
g. considerations to the existing residential driveway crossovers; and
h. a sealed turnaround facility sufficiently sized to accommodate a 3-point turn manoeuvre of a
heavy rigid vehicle (HRV) located at the end of the road.
Applicant’s Request
The applicant has request to delete Condition 97 to reflect the reduced scale of the development
and is supported by a Traffic Memorandum prepared by BMC Traffic.
Assessment of Request
Engineering Assessment
Page 7 of 13
Document Set ID: 23659436
Version: 9, Version Date: 23/04/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original