Council archive · source document
2009 KHA Original Response to IR · REC14/0015
Attached to the e-mail REC14/0015 Report, Previous IR response, Plans and owner's consent Email 2 of 3.
Response An assessment of the proposed development has been undertaken with consideration to Council’s issues, existing site conditions and design guidelines. A review of access driveway operations and widths for the proposed development has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of Australian Standards AS2890.1 for Off Street Car Parking Facilities. Table 3.2 and Clause 3.2.2 recommend widths for driveways. For residential property it is acceptable to have a driveway width of 3.0m with passing opportunities every 30m for up to 30 movements during the peak hour. The proposed 4 residential allotments will generate an estimated 4 movements during the peak hour, and therefore the proposed driveway design provided by TOD Consulting Engineers is considered suitable for the development. A passing opportunity has been provided within the easement increasing the driveway width to 5.0m. Queensland Streets Guidelines - Table 2.6F recommends carriageway width for passing and requires only 4.5m for a car and moving car at 10km/h. Therefore the proposed easement is considered suitable to service the 4 allotments and complies with the requirements for driveway as outlined in AS2890.1:2004 and also complies with the carriage width as outlined in Queensland Streets. Access to Lot 49 is preferred from Starboard Avenue as opposed to Eumundi-Noosa Road due to safety. Providing access for Lot 49 from a lower order street system of Starboard Avenue rather than providing an easement over Lot 48 to Eumundi-Noosa Road, which functions as a distributor road with high volumes of traffic, reduces potential conflict. It is generally recommended that future development be designed to minimise conflict points on the external road system by consolidating accesses and distributing local traffic through lower order access streets to controlled intersections. __ _ The" intersections of Ely Street and Headland Drive provide protection for tuning movements through auxiliary lanes and tapers, which is considered more suitable from a traffic safety perspective than providing access direct to Eumundi-Noosa Road via an easement over Lot 48, Source: Geoniees 1 Aerial Photograph of Proposed Development Site Hayes Traffic Engineering ABN 98 615 073 565 9184 Eumundi Noosa Rd COURTWARE RFI Response . - Page 2 of 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
2009 KHA Original Response to IR.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 589 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.