2009 KHA Original Response to IR · REC14/0015

2. Provide a traffic report prepared by a suitably qualified traffic consultant, addressing
the following:

2.1 Justification for having four (4) lots serviced by the access easement contrary to
The Noosa Plan and Planning Scheme Policy —5 requirement that "up to 2 fots"
be serviced by an access easement.

2.2 Justification for why access to Lot 49 is not to be provided from Eumundi Noosa
Road via an access easement over Lot 48.

2.3 Address the potential of adverse impact of the increased number of lots using
easement on the amenity and the noise level affecting properties adjoining the
access easement, taking into consideration the grade and the geometry of the
proposed access driveway.

2.4 A plan to demonstrate a safe maneuvering of delivery vehicles (HRV) within the
access easement without any undue obstruction to the traffic on the easement.

2.5 Show that safe and acceptable sight distances are provided at the rear right-
angle bend of the access easement.

2.6 Demonstrate that adequate and safe access can be maintained when having 8
garbage bins lined up on the frontage of the 8 metres wide easement on
Starboard Avenue.

Response:

A Traffic response addressing items 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 — 2.6 has been prepared by Hayes Traffic Engineering —
refer correspondence included as Attachment 2, This correspondence confirms that the proposal is
acceptable from a traffic engineering perspective. With respect to items 2.3 it is our opinion that the
Proposal will not result in any adverse amenity impacts given the low traffic movements and low speed
environment identified in the traffic response. A noise assessment has not been prepared and is not
considered necessary in this instance.

Drainage and Services

3. Provide drainage design plans showing the proposed stormwater disposal strategy for .... ..

‘the proposed driveway and allotments (including the upstream Lots 1 & 2 as
approved on Dwg 02170-L). The drainage design should inciude Provision of
unobstructed overland secondary flow path/s for storms up and including 1 in 100
years ARI storm events. The plans should also show existing council stormwater
structures/pits to be utilised for the stormwater connection and demonstrate that no
adverse impact caused to other properties or to existing infrastructures by the
Proposal.

Response:

A preliminary stormwater drainage design has been prepared by Tod Consulting - refer plan 090595 P2
included in Attachment 1, Inter altotment drainage will be provided for each lot and connected to a piped
drain along the driveway to the street. This drain will be connected to the future stormwater system in
the extension of Starboard Ave and ultimately to existing pipes in Sailfish Ct. (Refer to DA
2004/240011). Overland flow from lots 1, 2 & 48 ~ 51 will be controlled by the kerb on the driveway
and directed to the street.

4. Submit professionally prepared plans showing the proposed sewer reticulation layout
for the site including pipe sizes and longitudinal section. The plans shall include
sewer reticulation inside and outside the property to connect to the existing Council's
sewer system.

Response:
A preliminary sewer reticulation layout has been prepared by Tod Consulting - refer plan 090595 P4
included in Attachment 1. It is noted that the sewer downstream of MH NV22/03/12 will be diverted as