MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submissions Object - Petition

would seem evident that the School and the Church had intended the area to be protected for the
benefit and protection of the children at the School. This arrangement would appear consistent with the
Church's publicised desire, and Council's demonstrated willingness to cooperate, at the time of
purchase to prevent the construction of a proposed service station on the lot. This agreement               is
suggestive the parties intent to creating a negative equitable servitude or negative easement over the
property.


The planning scheme exists, among other things, to provide some certainty to the community in relation
to the types of development that can be approved for a specific property. Deviating from the planning
scheme and in particular deviating from this very inconsistency has already caused significant problems
for Noosa Council. As has been extensively reported the Council is currently attempting to deal with lax
adherence to the planning scheme related to retail intrusion into the industry zone.


Noosa Council's Infrastructure and Planning Director Martin Drydale said in May 201S that "It's
important   that we protect     this area for industrial Junctions. Residences, community     organisations,
commercial and retail business, and most sport and recreational land-use activities, should not operate
from industrial premises," He furthermore added that: "The reason for having a town plan is 50 that we
can ensure that various land-use types ore oppropriotely located to best serve the community.      Calling for
community and industry support he said: "Property owners and reol estate ogents ploy an important
role in helping to uphold the town plan's integrity" ... adding: "Just as the community   would likely object
to a factory opening up in a retail precinct such as Nooso Junction, retail shops and professional offices
are not appropriate   in industry zoned areas.   i1




It is incumbent upon the Assessment Manager and the Council at large in this situation to uphold the
plan's integrity and to do anything other than rejecting this Application is making no reflective of
Council's attempts to hold the industry and community to account in relation to the maintenance of
appropriate zoning in the region.


Any decision of the Assessment Manager must not conflict with the planning scheme, unless there are
sufficient grounds to justify the decision despite the conflict. Conflict means to be "at variance or
disagree with" and must be plainly identified. The proposed Development is clearly in conflict with the
planning scheme, a fact that is well demonstrated throughout this document. The conflict with the
planning instruments is not insignificant. Any sufficient grounds to justify approval under SPAs 326(1)(b),
must be of public interest, excluding the personal circumstances of the Applicant, owner or interested
party. The Applicant has shown no public interest grounds, nor do any exist, sufficient to justify approval
in the event of the conflict.


The Application must therefore be rejected as is required under the planning instruments as to allow it
by exception is not only contrary to SPA but a denial of the rights of the School's parents not to have
their children exposed to negative impacts of this inconsistent development.




                                                                                                           11