MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submissions Object - Petition

,-




     Code Objective           Developer's Assessment             Objectors' Assessment

                                                                 of those making them, and fails to
                                                                 address the potential impacts on the
                                                                 School children of the vapour
                                                                 emission from the facility.
                                                                 Detail provided elsewhere in this
                                                                 document        demonstrates    5 clear   link
                                                                 between      service station proximity       and
                                                                 harm to children. The Applicant fails
                                                                 to address these matters or to
                                                                 provide any credible data to support
                                                                 their contention. Neither does the
                                                                 Applicant does provide creditable, or
                                                                 indeed any, material to show that
                                                                 acceptable      and safe exposure levels
                                                                 can and will be maintained         during the
                                                                 operation     of the service station.



     LANDSCAPINGCODE

     028 Landscaping of       028 Complies                       Does not Comply
     carparklng   areas ...   It is considered   that one        The Development proposal is
                              advanced tree for every 6          noncompliant and not suitable for the
                              parking spaces is not              neighbourhood.
                              appropriate given that the car
                              parking area is located            The phrase "it is considered" is clearly
                              between the petrol building        an obfuscation,       without   qualification,
                              and the fuel court. It is          justification or validation of the
                              considered that trees will limit   credentials of the person holding the
                              casual surveillance   of this      consideration.      The siting of the car
                              area.                              parking area is the responsibility of
                                                                 the Applicant. Furthermore it is the
                              The site comprises 30%             Applicant's responsibility to design a
                              landscaping. This is considered    compliant       solution in all respects,
                              more than suitable.                including provision of required           trees
                                                                 AND sufficient casual surveillance to
                                                                 comply with the planning scheme.
                                                                 Council has determined by way of the
                                                                 planning scheme what is 'suitable'.
                                                                 The Applicant provides no
                                                                 qualification,     expert opinion or
                                                                 justification     to allow a conclusion that
                                                                 the amount        proposed is " ...more than
                                                                 suitable." The Applicant furthermore




                                                                                                                   19