Original source · versioned page text
Response to RFI - Council
Attached to the e-mail MCU17/0563 - Response to Information Request.
Attached to the e-mail Complete - Response to Info Request MCU17 0563.msg.
internal drainage. This stormwater system is shown on amended 360 Civil Consulting Drawing No. 03
(Rev A)’.
8. Provide further information, details and/or amendments to address the following:
a. The proposed development requires filling, increases load on the existing drainage
pipeline on the site and will limit future opportunities for repair and/or upgrade.
Also, there will be an increase in the flows in the pipeline due to the proposed
development. As such, it is considered necessary that CCTV investigation of the
existing pipeline (from The Cockleshell Street to Thomas Street) be carried out by
the applicant determine the condition of the pipeline and report of investigation
submitted to Council prior to issuing the OPW approval.
b. A drainage easement must be created by the applicant over the subject stormwater
pipeline at a width in compliance with Council’s standards and guidelines. Show the
required easement on the amended plans.
RESPONSE
Please refer to the Engineering Response to Council’s Information Request (Attachment 3), as well as the
Amended Operational Works Plans prepared by 360 Civil Consulting Pty Ltd (Attachment 2), which responds to
Information Request Items 7 – 9. The specific response to Information Request Item 8 is detailed below:
a) ‘Please find attached to this response a preliminary stormwater CCTV report for the existing 375mm
stormwater pipe that runs through 32 The Cockleshell, Noosaville. The CCTV commenced at The
Cockleshell inlet pit and DrainsKleen have advised that "the survey was abandoned - camera travelled
downstream about 7m, before reaching, root mass which camera could not pass. Attempted reverse
survey from other end but unable to access pit."
The report and photos from DrainsKleen of the root mass is attached for council's information. Further
clarification from DrainsKleen regarding the reverse survey was sought and the DrainsKleen operator
who was on site has advised that: -
"I was unable to locate the downstream pit (unsure if downstream pit exists or is just cut into another
pipe). I am also unable to go from one of the neighbour pits on Thomas Street as I can't go around
corners with robot camera due to risk of damaging equipment."
Since this survey, Council have advised that, in due course, they will unblock the stormwater pipe and
that no further work by this development is required in order to address this information request item.
Reviewing the photographs provided in the DrainsKleen report the pipe that is visible appears to be in a
reasonable condition.
b) Please refer to the amended 360 Civil Consulting Drawing No. 03 (Rev 3) which details the 4m wide
drainage easement over the existing council stormwater infrastructure’.
9. Provide an engineering plan and longitudinal cross section for the access driveway/s and
crossovers that include 2.0m wide pathway and demonstrates compliance with IPWEA
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.