Original source · versioned page text
Development Application Part 2 of 2 Report and Plans OPW13/0100
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (37.6 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
COLUMN 1 COLUMN 2 ASSESSMENT
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS (if code assessable)
AND f) The proposal will not result in more than 1 below
S6.3 awning sign per frontage.
Freestanding signs, other than flagpoles -
a) do not exceed 5m in total height; In relation to the proposed freestanding signs -
b) do not exceed 4m2 of sign face area per side; a)
.
none of the freestanding signs will exceed 5m in
and height and as such, comply with the probable solution.
c) are limited to 1 sign per frontage. In particular, the maximum height of the proposed
Sheraton freestanding signs is approximately 2.84m
AND and the Gato’s Restaurant freestanding sign will have
S6.4 a height of approximately 2.06m.
Hanging signs -
b) the signs do not exceed 4m2 per face area and
a) do not exceed O.3m2 on any single sign face achieve compliance with the probable solution.
area; Specifically:
b) do not protrude more than 500mm from the 2 x free standing signs for the Sheraton (branding
.
building or structure to which it is fixed; and directional information) 1.917m2 per sign;
-
c) the lowest part of the sign is not less than 1 x free standing sign for Gato’s Restaurant and
.
2.4m above any publicly accessible area menu information -
1.133m2;
including footways; and .
Recladding and updating of the existing free
d) are limited to 1 sign per frontage. standing directional sign for the Sheraton -
2 .
1.26m.
AND c) Probable solution 6.3c) identifies that freestanding
S6.5 signs (other than flagpoles) are limited to 1 sign per
Vertical signs -
frontage. The proposal will result in two (2)
a) are not greater than 2.4m in heights, O.6m in freestanding signs along the Hastings Street frontage
width and O.3m in depth and have a sign face of the site and therefore presents an alternative design
area notexceeding 1.5m2 per side; solution. Given that the Sheraton site is the largest
b) have a minimum clearance of at least 2.4m single property in Hastings Street with a frontage of
between its underside and any publicly approximately 93m, it is considered that the Hastings
accessible area; Street frontage can support a total of two (2)
c) are not closer than 3m to another vertical freestanding signs. It is also important to note that the
sign; proposal will result in the reduction of the total number
d) are rigidly fixed and are not constructed out of of existing freestanding signs along the Hastings
materials that re potentially dangerous to Street frontage of the site. In this regard, it is proposed
pedestrians (eg glass); and to demolish 4 existing freestanding signs associated
e) are limited to 1 sign per frontage. with Gato’s Restaurant and replace them with 1
freestanding sign having a maximum height of 2.06m
and face area of 1.133m2. The existing Sheraton
freestanding sign will also be removed and replaced
with a new contemporary freestanding sign having a
Advertising Devices Code Page 5
.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.