Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

EMU MOUNTAIN ROAD - SHARED PATHWAY · Report

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING                                                          12 AUGUST 2024


2.        ASSESSMENT


As summarised in Attachment 1, the assessment of the preferred option is complex, with competing
factors of Usability, Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED), Traffic and
Environmental / Landscape Impact, with no clear optimal recommendation from competing factors.


As outlined above, Option 1b requires roundabout modification including lane reduction and
deflection to reduce vehicle speed at the roundabout exit and improve safety at the crossing point.
Whilst the improvements to the safety of the crossing point are welcome, concerns are raised for
impacts on vehicle capacity at the roundabout and potential congestion or perceived congestion at
the roundabout arising from the changes.


In addition, Council’s 2016 Traffic Study has previously identified the future need for 4 traffic lanes
on the northern leg of the David Low Way / Emu Mountain Road roundabout, comprising the addition
of a longer merge departure lane and an additional short approach lane. The proposal to cross
pedestrians at this location may conflict with long- term road vehicular network planning


The extent of the road network under management of TMR is indicated in the figure below, with the
existing crossing point and exit lanes under TMR management. It is noted that any proposal for
redesign is long term in nature, and ideally provides an opportunity for an optimal crossing
environment for cyclists and pedestrians at that time.




Figure 3: TMR control of David Low Way Roundabout


On balance it is considered Option 1b the optimal outcome for the following reasons:
     •   The proposal is strategically consistent with Councils Cycling and Walking Strategy
     •   The proposal for active transport assist in reduction of carbon emissions and congestion
         reduction, by providing a viable cycling links for a significant number of residents west of
         Peregian Beach to access the beach and village without use of a private car
     •   Option 1b provides the most direct route for convenience of residents and optimal CPTED
Log in to download the original file

Report.pdf · 4.8 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.