Skip to the record
Every word, every meeting.
Item 6.8.2024-08-12 · General CommitteeOfficial item record

Emu Mountain Road - Shared Pathway

← Meeting agenda & transcript

See the votes on this matter →

What was decided?

The minuted decision sequence

No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.

1Committee RecommendationCarried

Moved: Frank Wilkie · Seconded: Karen Finzel

That Council 

A. Note the report by the Director Infrastructure Services to the General Committee Meeting dated 12 August 2024;

B. Support a shared path and cycleway along the northern side of Emu Mountain Road described at Option 1b to be funded and constructed by Sunshine Coast Council including the submission of grant applications by Sunshine Coast Council;

C. Request Sunshine Coast Council liaise with environmental agencies and stakeholders to mitigate environmental impact of Option 1b including revegetation of batters and consideration of offset planting;

D. Note that Noosa Council will refer any ongoing issues or concerns about performance of the crossing on David Low Way and / or vehicular congestion arising from modifications to the David Low Way roundabout to Sunshine Coast Council and TMR for their attention; and

E. Authorise the CEO to execute an infrastructure agreement with Sunshine Coast Council for their ongoing maintenance of the proposed shared pathway including pavements, embankments and boardwalks.

Carried unanimously.

Official minutes · section 1

Read complete item-specific minutes
Committee Recommendation

Moved:Cr Frank Wilkie
Seconded:Cr Karen Finzel

That Council 
  1. Note the report by the Director Infrastructure Services to the General Committee Meeting dated 12 August 2024;
  2. Support a shared path and cycleway along the northern side of Emu Mountain Road described at Option 1b to be funded and constructed by Sunshine Coast Council including the submission of grant applications by Sunshine Coast Council;
  3. Request Sunshine Coast Council liaise with environmental agencies and stakeholders to mitigate environmental impact of Option 1b including revegetation of batters and consideration of offset planting;
  4. Note that Noosa Council will refer any ongoing issues or concerns about performance of the crossing on David Low Way and / or vehicular congestion arising from modifications to the David Low Way roundabout to Sunshine Coast Council and TMR for their attention; and
  5. Authorise the CEO to execute an infrastructure agreement with Sunshine Coast Council for their ongoing maintenance of the proposed shared pathway including pavements, embankments and boardwalks.
Carried unanimously.


This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.

What was said?

Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV

These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.

Brian Stockwell187:18
I'll put the motion. Those in favour? Thank you. That's unanimous. Anybody think it was a long day? Okay. I see that our Acting Director Infrastructure Services is making his way to the table with Craig, his manager of design. Of the his water office. Or glass. Yeah, that's it. And they're here to talk about the Emu Mountain Road shared pathway.
Shaun Walsh187:50
Good morning, sorry, good afternoon, the report concerns are proposed shared pathway along Emu Mountain Road between our residents who live outside the Shire and Bridger springs locality to come through to the eastern shores to actually access both the Bridger village within Noosa Shire as well as facilities south such as Coolum village and the Coolum state school. The need for the link is without question. It's even shown on Council's own site when the walking strategy has been desirable. But the options available for actual construction have been subject to ongoing discussion between Council officers and Councillors now for over two years without a clear answer being provided um the ideal route does not have a perfect answer. So one option has a better environmental footprint but it is less than optimal from a safety perspective both due to the pedestrian crossing across the new mountain road as well as the septic issue. So the option that is sought by some central Coast Council has probably a more significant nature conservation footprint upon the road reserve adjacent to Noosa National Park that is optimal from both a usability perspective and being the direct route, you know, for cyclists and walkers has the least crossing points at the lowest speed environment adjacent to David Low Way. But, you know, it's not optimal from the natural environment perspective. So we've analysed it and we consider that option 1B, as recommended by Sunshine Coast Council is the optimal outcome. We consider the risks associated with the crossing point north of the David Low Way roundabout as being part of Transport and Main Roads responsibility, de-risk for Noosa Council perspective, we note that there possibly could be congestion issues associated with the Peregian Beach roundabout. There already are. That is a long-term issue that we will all have to work towards with TMR to Resolve. So that's the summary of the recommended report. Thank you. Do we have any questions?
Frank Wilkie194:00
Thank you for the report, Shaun. This is a very important project. It represents a new level of inter-Council cooperation that places the safety of residents and children regardless of. Where they live as a priority. Schoolchildren are already riding on Emu Mountain Road on their bikes or walking beside it to get to school and the village. This project will take them off the road into a safer environment. To a to changed a northern crossing at the roundabout which would be safer than currently where they're crossing. The risk is if we don't do it, it's more highly likely that something will happen. My opinion to someone who's currently using the roadway to access the village, the school and the coastal bike pathway. There's no financial risk to Noosa Council. The project is entirely funded by Sunshine Coast Council and there will be ongoing maintenance funded and provided by Sunshine Coast Council. I think it's a great, as I said, a great example of inter-regional cooperation. It's the responsible and the right thing to do and thank you for your report on this show and your advice.
1 suggested discussion start time
  • 11240.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Recording time not yet verified. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.