Council archive · source document
Further information re Request to Change Approval MCU 132003.221132.8
Very large file (39.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 15, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
BROWN
,’m.lIl .’
Summary of Results
. To gauge the effectiveness of Basins B1A and B1C, Option 2 was modelled with only the two
basins and the original sized Twigrush Basin. Dodonaea Basin is not included in the Option 2
model. The results indicated that the two basins upstream are not sufficient in mitigating
peak flows with increases of up to 15%.
Option 3 strategy incorporates basins B1A, B1C, Twigrush Basin and the Dodonaea Basin. For
this option the reduction in Water Surface Levels (WSL’s) in the Dodonaea Basin are
significant (0.78m to 1.01m). The time in which it takes the Dodonaea basin to empty has
reduced, up to 30 minutes shorter than previously to empty during a 100 year ARI event.
. The analysis of site only developed areas in Option 4 has shown that the basins can be sized
at 40%, 55% and 65% of capacity for basin B1A, B1C and Twigrush respectively to achieve
the non-worsening objective. It should be noted that the analysis for this option does not
take into account the potential for peak flows from the site and upstream catchments to
coincide and may not be acceptable to Council.
B09182.W _Options_2_3_40NLY_130314.docx Page 5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Further information re Request to Change Approval MCU 132003.221132.8Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 39.0 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.