Council archive · source document
Further information re Request to Change Approval MCU 132003.221132.8
Very large file (39.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 21, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
’,J.1..JaIiI,i.".,
~’
.’.
’~’~;.{.,,~. ’! _, .
~~.,.~. ~
-
~~2~: ~~~,i~. "
J>~~/ --::n~
r
~.
~~~~~~.. I:.... .. J~,;-.j., ".,
~, ~ ....~.~~.,., .
::.~~"", .
"~l-~"’"
.
"’. ,."" ’
Our Ref: B09182.W.Ol.MS.ip.A uthorities.docx
Contact: Andrew McPhail
BROWN
Smart Consulting
RPS Australia Asia Pacific
C/ Brown Consulting (QLD)Pty Ltd
-
PO Box 997
BUDDINA QLD 4575
17 April 2013
Attention: Sian Davis
Dear Sian,
Proposed Residential Development Lake Doonella, Noosa Stage C -
Stormwater Management Plan (Quantity)
Updated Management Strategy
Brown Consulting (QLD) Pty Ltd have previously prepared a Flood Investigation & Stormwater
Management Plan (Report No. B09182.W-02A dated October 2011) for Stockland Pty Ltd for the
proposed Stage C Residential Development at Lake Doonella, Noosa.
A hydrological analysis was previously undertaken to determine the change in peak flows from the
proposed Doonella Subdivision and the mitigation provided by the pl:Oposed stormwater detention
measures. Hydraulic modelling was also undertaken to detennine
post development flood levels to
confirm proposed lot and road levels had appropriate flood immunity
along the environmental corridor
through the site.
Since the submission of this report, Sunshine Coast Regional Council
(SCRC)has indicated that the use
of the environmental corridor for detention (referred to as the Dodonaea Close Detention Basin)
outlined in the Stonnwater Management Plan was not acceptable.
Subsequent meetings with SCRC
have led to the design change process. New peak flow
management options have been proposed, with
Option 3 deemed to be viable. This was indicated in an email from Senior Development Planner
Dennis Wallace dated 30 March 2013 (refer to Attachment 1) in which it stated:
Oftbe SW7I1 options submitted, onlY Option 3 was a presented as viable and doem’, appear to provide significant
benefits over the originalproposal in regard to soil Irydrology and impacts ojC).."isting vegetation, On this basis, council
would be willi11g to amend the approval(s) to allow for the originallY proposed Dodollaea detention
area, provided we
can also do thefollowing:
Allow forfaunapassage, includillg afauna underpass;
Rebabilitate tbefau11a corridor area post construction disturbances a11d the
changes to tbe soillrydrology
and vegetation that will resultfrom the detention area;
Obtai11 an Op lForks revegetation/ rehabilitation approvalfor tbe above.
This letter report presents the analysis and results for the new peak flow
management strategy
(Option 3) for the proposed residential subdivision as requested by Council. It is noted that post
construction rehabilitation of the environmental corridor is outside the
scope of this letter,
Level 6,199 Grey Street South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia Brown Consulting (QLD)Pty Ltd
PO Box 10349 Adelaide Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Australi~ ABN 38 109 428 506
Telephone +61 738953444 Facsjmile +61 738953400 brownc{)nsulting.com.nu
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Further information re Request to Change Approval MCU 132003.221132.8Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 39.0 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.