Council archive · source document
Further information re Request to Change Approval MCU 132003.221132.8
Very large file (39.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Original PDF page 41, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT DESIGN AND ASSESSMENTS 2-2
. GP -
90%.
These load reduction targets relate to a comparison of the developed site without stormwater
mitigation to the developed site with stormwater mitigated employed.
Measures relating to quantity, i.e. frequent flow management and waterway stability are either being
addressed by others, or are not applicable given that most of the site drains to tidal receiving waters.
2.1.1 Developed Site MUSIC Modelling
Section 2.3.5 of the approved Doonella Noosa Storm water and Water Quality Management Plan
(WBM,2005) provided modelling results for the proposed development.
This existing site MUSIC model which has been continually refined and modified since the initial
assessment phase back in the early 2000’s (in terms of representing as constructed works, and
maintaining consistency with model releases). This model has again been checked to ensure that it
represents proposed stormwater management controls for Stage C. Previous stages including A, B
and D (which are approved) have been assessed and approved under the no-net-increase objective.
For the MUSIC modelling, the rainfall period utilised for the assessment was from 1/1/1973 to
31/12/1982 which is consistent with the recommendations of the SEQ MUSIC Modelling Guidelines
(WBD,2011). Selection of appropriate rainfall datasets and choice of a longer term modelling period
for MUSIC assessments is generally considered best practice as it will provide for a more realistic
estimate of mean annual loads. The model time-step selected for this 10 year period was 6 minute.
The bio-retention nodes within the models were the "Version 3" nodes, which is consistent with all
previous modelling work completed for the project, and are understood to provide relatively similar
results to the most recent Version 5 bio-retention node, which SeRC may not have yet recommended
for use.
Stage C when assessed alone provided pollutant export results as included in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Mean Annual Pollutant Loads Stage C -
Modelling Period 73-83, 6min,Cooroy
Pollutant Pollutant Pollutant Pollutant Load Based
Load (un- Load Load Load Reduction
Parameter
developed) (developed (developed Reduction Development
unmitigated) mitigated) (unmitvs mit) Target
Flow (ML/yr) 46.1 69.9 56.2 19.5% NA
TSS (kg/yr) 3,880 17,400 2,190 87.4% 80%
TP (kg/yr) 4.06 18.2 4.4 75.8% 60%
TN (kg/yr) 44.5 141 58 58.9% 45%
GP (ky/yr) 0 1,000 30.1 97.0% 90%
The following can be seen from these results:
. When the Undeveloped Loads are compared to the Developed Mitigated Loads there is a
reduction in TSS loads and increases in TP, TN and GP loads;
. The increases in TP load predicted is around 8%. This is similar to what was originally included
in the approved Doonella Noosa Storm water and Water Quality Management Plan (WBM,
2005);
G:IADMIN’815573.G.BADIR.B15573.002.00.00C _+
!\,_ BMT WBM
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Further information re Request to Change Approval MCU 132003.221132.8Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 39.0 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.