Original source · versioned page text
Stormwater Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail Education Type 2 School - Car Park - MCU18/0097.
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 11, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Good Shepherd Lutheran College Odyssey Consulting Group Proposed Unit Development Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan Lot 30 on SP170751 Project No: K4277 115 EUMUNDI NOOSA ROAD, NOOSAVILLE Table 8: External Catchment Time of concentration Catchment Catchment Concentrated Catchment 2 Overland flow flow Area (m ) Properties Total tc Friend’s Equation QUDM Figure 4.09 Open Horton’s (n) = Space/parks – 0.035 A 449 Light cover L = 31 m n/a 11.04 min bushland / poor Slope = 4.38% grass cover t = 11.04 min 3.4.4 Design Flow Rates Design storm flow rates have been calculated for standard storms with an ARI of 2, 10, 20 and 100 years for the external catchments using design rainfall intensities from the Bureau of Meteorology. The Rational Method (Q = 2.78 x 10-3 CIA) has been used to calculate the design flow rates. The peak flows for the external catchments are presented in Table 9. Table 9: External Catchment A Peak Flow Rates Average Recurrence Interval ARI 2 5 10 20 100 Coefficient of Runoff C 0.60 0.67 0.70 0.74 0.84 Area of Catchment (ha) A 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 Average Rainfall Intensity (mm/h) I 121.1 149.7 166.0 188.6 240.5 Peak Flow Rate (m3/s) Q 0.008 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.024 3.4.5 External Catchment Channel Conveyance External Catchment A External Catchment A currently discharges stormwater through the site. Flows from External Catchment A will be captured in a field inlet in the subject site’s north eastern corner and conveyed to Council stormwater infrastructure on the north eastern boundary. For details and locations of the proposed field inlet refer to Odyssey Consulting Group, Stormwater Management Plan (Ref: K4277/P007/A) included as Appendix F. 4.0 STORMWATER DETENTION The development of land will potentially increase peak flow rates from the subject site due to increased impervious areas and a reduced critical time of concentration. The following section provides preliminary details of an onsite detention system ensuring there will be no adverse impacts associated with the increased runoff rate on downstream properties and infrastructure. K4277-0002 14 March 2018 Page 7 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.