Original source · versioned page text
Stormwater Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail Education Type 2 School - Car Park - MCU18/0097.
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 12, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Good Shepherd Lutheran College Odyssey Consulting Group Proposed Unit Development Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan Lot 30 on SP170751 Project No: K4277 115 EUMUNDI NOOSA ROAD, NOOSAVILLE 4.1 Objective In accordance with Urban Stormwater Quality Planning Guidelines 2010 (DERM USQG) the following objective has been set for stormwater discharge from the site and proposed development: No net increase in peak flows from the subject site for all events up to the Q 100 storm event during the post developed condition. This objective shall be achieved by detaining site runoff within a detention tank located within the development. 4.2 Hydraulic Model A calculation of the required detention volume to mitigate any increase in total site discharge rates has been made using the DRAINS software programme. DRAINS modelling has been adopted at the preliminary planning stage to ensure that the detention tank volume is estimated with a higher degree of confidence. As finished site levels and internal pipe levels are still approximate, this initial calculation is an estimate but is accurate enough to progress the design with confidence. The DRAINS model comprised of two post development Catchments. Catchment A flows shall be directed towards existing stormwater infrastructure located in Eumundi Noosa Road via a detention basin. Catchment B flows shall be directed towards existing stormwater infrastructure located in Walter Hay Drive. The 2, 10 and 100 year ARI storm events were analysed for all standard durations ranging from 10 minutes to 180 minutes. It was determined that the 25 minute storm is the critical duration for the peak site discharge for both the pre development and post development scenarios. The combined peak discharge rates for the site calculated by the DRAINS model is shown below for both scenarios. Table 10: Peak Discharge Rate for Site (m3/s) Q2 Q10 Q100 Pre Development 0.104 0.169 0.277 Post Development (unmitigated) 0.174 0.280 0.440 As the development will increase peak discharge rates from the site, onsite detention will be required to attenuate runoff to pre development levels. 4.3 Detention Volume The following detention storage parameters were found to achieve the target mitigated pre development flow rates: K4277-0002 14 March 2018 Page 8 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.