Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 2 - Existing Approval.pdf
ANNUAL ARBORIST INSPECTION TREETOP ADVENTURES CENTRAL COAST NSW 2287
The proposed development foot print has houses of varying ages and as such there impact on the current trees is evident , many of the larger species are
all forest form which indicates they were self-sown and already in place when these current dwellings we built . There are no significant species on site and
are all tytpical to the region
Tree Details
Tree Botanical Name Height Width DBH Age Health Structure ULE Risk Arborist Assessment
Number Common Name (CM) rating Risk Mitigation Works
1 Araucaria heterophylla 14 16 65 26.40457 M FG F 15 to Medium Arborist Assessment
153.05052 40 This tree was previously lopped and is evident in the trifurcation in the leaders and
Norfolk Pine conflicts with the Energex HV lines and are continually being managed only on onside.
which creates a weight bias and then coupling that with the weak epicormic growth?
these trees in such an exposed position are long term risk that is ever increasing, because.
of the attachment concerns
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
2 Araucaria heterophylla 19 10 78 -26.40477 M FG F 15 to Medium Arborist Assessment
153.05035 40 This tree was previously lopped and is evident in the trifurcation in the leaders and
Norfolk Pine conflicts with the Energex HV lines and are continually being managed only on onside.
which creates a weight bias and then coupling that with the weak epicormic growth?
these trees in such an exposed position are long term risk that is ever increasing, because.
of the attachment concerns
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
3 Araucaria heterophylla 15 5 67 -26.40456 M F F 15 to Medium Arborist Assessment
153.05060 40 This tree was previously lopped and is evident in the trifurcation in the leaders and
Norfolk Pine conflicts with the Energex HV lines and are continually being managed only on onside.
which creates a weight bias and then coupling that with the weak epicormic growth?
these trees in such an exposed position are long term risk that is ever increasing, because.
of the attachment concerns
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
4 Eugenia uniflora 4 5 22 -26.40475 M FG P 15 to Low Arborist Assessment
153.05008 40 As this site is currently developed this tree is on a boundary and as such has all the urban
Brazilian Cherry forest pressures such as fences driveways soil compaction and limited or impeded root.
growth space as well as uninterrupted root plate exposure to rain from the structures.
And as such has an augmented growth because of this which is evident in its growth habit.
Also, this is an exposed site and as such long term no ideal conditions for a forest form tree.
Arborist Recommendations
Document Set ID: 23014611
22619723
Version: 2,
1, Version Date: 13/05/2024
13/10/2023
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Attachment 2 - Existing Approval.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.