Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 2 - Existing Approval.pdf
ANNUAL ARBORIST INSPECTION TREETOP ADVENTURES CENTRAL COAST NSW 2287
Complete removal
5 Peltophrin Ssp 8 6 44 -26.40453 SM / FG FG 15 to Low Arborist Assessment
153.05076 M 40 As this site is currently developed this tree is on a boundary and as such has all the urban
forest pressures such as fences driveways soil compaction and limited or impeded root.
growth space as well as uninterrupted root plate exposure to rain from the structures.
And as such has an augmented growth because of this which is evident in its growth habit.
Also, this is an exposed site and as such long term no ideal conditions for a forest form tree.
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
6 Ficus Ssp 16 8 51 -26.40422 SM/M G G 40+ Low Arborist Assessment
153.05151 This tree is tangled amongst a mature Paper bark and has open crouches in an exposed posi
Fig Tree and has compromised unions indicative of the species. As a wetland species they are
very explorative with their root systems and generally compromise plumbing.
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
7 Melaleuca quinquinevia 18 15 112 -26.40459 M G G 15 to Low Arborist Assessment
153.05121 40 This tree is tangled amongst a strangler fig and has open crouches in an exposed position.
Paper Bark and has compromised unions indicative of the species. As a wetland species they are
very explorative with their root systems and generally compromise plumbing.
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
8 Mangifera indica 12 15 65 -26.40384 M FG FG 15 to Low Arborist Assessment
153.05133 40 This is a mature fruit tree and will be in the middle of the development and with if come all.
Mango Tree the concerns with root incursion and fruit drop and vermin attractant properties which
again, in an urban environment are not ideal. Also, the concerns with bat issues when in
fruit also. Structurally the tree presents typically with signs of poor management practices.
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
9 Eucalyptus grandis 21 12 112 -26.40446 M G G 15 to Low Arborist Assessment
153.05108 40 Tree presents with typical forest form which again in indicative for the species and has a
Flooded Gum Spreading canopy and a bias to the west and due to its nature will be a management.
concern from a development and long tern position. A tree of this type needs to be in a
forest where it can benefit from collective protection not in a dense urban environment.
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
10 Eucalyptus grandis 18 7 79 -2640448 M FG FG 15 to Low Arborist Assessment
153.05128 40 Tree presents with typical forest form which again in indicative for the species and has a
Flooded Gum Spreading canopy and a bias to the west and due to its nature will be a management.
concern from a development and long tern position. A tree of this type needs to be in a
forest where it can benefit from collective protection not in a dense urban environment.
Arborist Recommendations
Complete removal
11 Eucalyptus Grandis 25 3 28 -2640463 M G G 15 to Low Arborist Assessment
153.05135 40 Tree presents with typical forest form which again in indicative for the species and has a
Flooded Gum Spreading canopy and a bias to the west and due to its nature will be a management.
concern from a development and long tern position. A tree of this type needs to be in a
Document Set ID: 23014611
22619723
Version: 2,
1, Version Date: 13/05/2024
13/10/2023
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Attachment 2 - Existing Approval.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.