Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

Attachment 2 - Existing Approval.pdf

of 113

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                                                  ANNUAL ARBORIST INSPECTION TREETOP ADVENTURES CENTRAL COAST NSW 2287

                                                                                                              Complete removal
        5            Peltophrin Ssp           8        6     44    -26.40453   SM /   FG   FG   15 to   Low   Arborist Assessment
                                                                   153.05076   M                40            As this site is currently developed this tree is on a boundary and as such has all the urban
                                                                                                              forest pressures such as fences driveways soil compaction and limited or impeded root.
                                                                                                              growth space as well as uninterrupted root plate exposure to rain from the structures.
                                                                                                              And as such has an augmented growth because of this which is evident in its growth habit.
                                                                                                              Also, this is an exposed site and as such long term no ideal conditions for a forest form tree.
                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                              Complete removal
        6            Ficus Ssp                16       8     51    -26.40422   SM/M   G    G    40+     Low   Arborist Assessment
                                                                   153.05151                                  This tree is tangled amongst a mature Paper bark and has open crouches in an exposed posi
                     Fig Tree                                                                                 and has compromised unions indicative of the species. As a wetland species they are
                                                                                                              very explorative with their root systems and generally compromise plumbing.
                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                              Complete removal
        7            Melaleuca quinquinevia   18       15    112   -26.40459   M      G    G    15 to   Low   Arborist Assessment
                                                                   153.05121                    40            This tree is tangled amongst a strangler fig and has open crouches in an exposed position.
                     Paper Bark                                                                               and has compromised unions indicative of the species. As a wetland species they are
                                                                                                              very explorative with their root systems and generally compromise plumbing.
                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                              Complete removal
        8            Mangifera indica         12       15    65    -26.40384   M      FG   FG   15 to   Low   Arborist Assessment
                                                                   153.05133                    40            This is a mature fruit tree and will be in the middle of the development and with if come all.
                     Mango Tree                                                                               the concerns with root incursion and fruit drop and vermin attractant properties which
                                                                                                              again, in an urban environment are not ideal. Also, the concerns with bat issues when in
                                                                                                              fruit also. Structurally the tree presents typically with signs of poor management practices.
                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                              Complete removal
        9            Eucalyptus grandis       21       12    112   -26.40446   M      G    G    15 to   Low   Arborist Assessment
                                                                   153.05108                    40            Tree presents with typical forest form which again in indicative for the species and has a
                     Flooded Gum                                                                              Spreading canopy and a bias to the west and due to its nature will be a management.
                                                                                                              concern from a development and long tern position. A tree of this type needs to be in a
                                                                                                               forest where it can benefit from collective protection not in a dense urban environment.
                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                              Complete removal
        10           Eucalyptus grandis       18       7     79    -2640448    M      FG   FG   15 to   Low   Arborist Assessment
                                                                   153.05128                    40            Tree presents with typical forest form which again in indicative for the species and has a
                     Flooded Gum                                                                              Spreading canopy and a bias to the west and due to its nature will be a management.
                                                                                                              concern from a development and long tern position. A tree of this type needs to be in a
                                                                                                               forest where it can benefit from collective protection not in a dense urban environment.
                                                                                                              Arborist Recommendations
                                                                                                              Complete removal
        11           Eucalyptus Grandis       25       3     28    -2640463    M      G    G    15 to   Low   Arborist Assessment
                                                                   153.05135                    40            Tree presents with typical forest form which again in indicative for the species and has a
                     Flooded Gum                                                                              Spreading canopy and a bias to the west and due to its nature will be a management.
                                                                                                              concern from a development and long tern position. A tree of this type needs to be in a




Document Set ID: 23014611
                  22619723
Version: 2,
         1, Version Date: 13/05/2024
                          13/10/2023

Log in to download the original (Attachment 2 - Existing Approval.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.