Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Council archive · source document

08/0749 - Op Works - Dam [As Published] · 142008.749

of 16

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.2, 31 March 2008

 

 

‘STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD 4]
4.1.1 Is any part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road?

No

(Yes

If no, is the proposed operational work for filling or excavating listed in Integrated Planning Regulation 1998,
schedule 5 and does it exceed the threshold?
K] No - Gotoasr2
oO Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regiedbon SfeGie tat 2 fend et Re nadben 3 Mien 2 lah sien Tae

‘ACID SULFATE SOILS ]

4.1.2 |s any of the operational work proposed in a local government area listed*’ in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing
Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils

BX] No - Got 04.13 (7 Yes

4Taurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Burnett, Caboolture, Cairns, Catfiope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cootoola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Mornington, Noosa, Pine Rivers,
Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

IP Requ.ation schedule 2. table 3 den 4 State Pianeing Polwy 202) Fiannng und Manuyss; Devetopmeni vivelving Aud Scifaie Sovy secon 3 6

|EASEMENTS AND SUBSTATIONS \

 

4.1.3 Is any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?
(C1 No - Goto Qa.14
Yes
If yes, is the filling or excavation associated with reconfiguring a lot?
(J Yes - Goto 94.1.4
DX] No - Answer both (a) and (b) below

(a) Is any part of the premises subject to an easement in favour of a distribution entity or transmission entity under
the Electricity Act 1994?

X] No
C] Yes

(b) !s any of the operational work proposed to be located within 10m of a substation site under the Electricity
Act 1994?

& No oO Yes - This application must be referred to the entity responsible for the substation as Advice Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 4 teu f(a), #P Regulation, schedule 2 table 3 den 10{b)

4.1.4 Is any part of the premises subject to an easement in favour of the holder of Pipeline Licence Number 1 issued under the
Petroleum Act 1923 for the construction or operation of the Moonie to Brisbane strategic pipeline under that Act?

BX] No -Gotoa415 (] Yes

JP Regulation scheriia 2 table 3 ten dy

[PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT |

 

4.1.5 Is any of the proposed operational work listed in schedule 13C of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?

Dd No- Go to 04.1.6 (J Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Requauion schedule 2 table 3. tem 14

 

[RAILWAY SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY ]

4.1.6 Is any of the proposed operational work listed in schedule 13D of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?

[X] No- Goto 04.1.7 LJ Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation scheme 2 bible 4 dem 15

Used in these records

About this file

File size
970 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_0749 - Op Works - Dam [As Published].pdf · 970 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.