Council archive · source document
08/0749 - Op Works - Dam [As Published] · 142008.749
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.2, 31 March 2008
‘STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD 4]
4.1.1 Is any part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road?
No
(Yes
If no, is the proposed operational work for filling or excavating listed in Integrated Planning Regulation 1998,
schedule 5 and does it exceed the threshold?
K] No - Gotoasr2
oO Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regiedbon SfeGie tat 2 fend et Re nadben 3 Mien 2 lah sien Tae
‘ACID SULFATE SOILS ]
4.1.2 |s any of the operational work proposed in a local government area listed*’ in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing
Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils
BX] No - Got 04.13 (7 Yes
4Taurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Burnett, Caboolture, Cairns, Catfiope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cootoola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Mornington, Noosa, Pine Rivers,
Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday
IP Requ.ation schedule 2. table 3 den 4 State Pianeing Polwy 202) Fiannng und Manuyss; Devetopmeni vivelving Aud Scifaie Sovy secon 3 6
|EASEMENTS AND SUBSTATIONS \
4.1.3 Is any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?
(C1 No - Goto Qa.14
Yes
If yes, is the filling or excavation associated with reconfiguring a lot?
(J Yes - Goto 94.1.4
DX] No - Answer both (a) and (b) below
(a) Is any part of the premises subject to an easement in favour of a distribution entity or transmission entity under
the Electricity Act 1994?
X] No
C] Yes
(b) !s any of the operational work proposed to be located within 10m of a substation site under the Electricity
Act 1994?
& No oO Yes - This application must be referred to the entity responsible for the substation as Advice Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 4 teu f(a), #P Regulation, schedule 2 table 3 den 10{b)
4.1.4 Is any part of the premises subject to an easement in favour of the holder of Pipeline Licence Number 1 issued under the
Petroleum Act 1923 for the construction or operation of the Moonie to Brisbane strategic pipeline under that Act?
BX] No -Gotoa415 (] Yes
JP Regulation scheriia 2 table 3 ten dy
[PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT |
4.1.5 Is any of the proposed operational work listed in schedule 13C of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?
Dd No- Go to 04.1.6 (J Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Requauion schedule 2 table 3. tem 14
[RAILWAY SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY ]
4.1.6 Is any of the proposed operational work listed in schedule 13D of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?
[X] No- Goto 04.1.7 LJ Yes - This application must be referred to Queensland Transport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation scheme 2 bible 4 dem 15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/0749 - Op Works - Dam [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 970 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.