Appendix H - SDAP Response · REC15/0011

Performance outcomes                        Acceptable outcomes                                                 Response      Comment
and operation.
Within a wild river area: geomorphic processes
PO10 Excavation and filling for             No acceptable outcome is prescribed.                                N/A           The proposed development is not for operational works.
prescribed tidal work within a wild river
area is carried out only to the extent
necessary for the development.
PO11 Works in a tidal area within a wild    AO11.1 Where it is necessary to remove a marine plant,              N/A           The proposed development is not for operational works.
river area are designed and constructed     the root system must be left in the substrate to minimise
in a way to ensure they do not adversely    disturbance to bed and banks.
affect the stability of the bed and banks   AND
of any waterway.
                                            AO11.2 When the works are completed, any tidal lands                N/A           The proposed development is not for operational works.
                                            disturbed by activities beyond the footprint of the works
                                            are restored to pre-disturbance condition to promote
                                            natural restoration of marine plants and fish habitats.


Within a wild river area: water quality
PO12 No pollutants are released from        No acceptable outcome is prescribed.                                N/A           The proposed development is not for operational works.
the activity.


Table 10.1.3: Reconfiguring a lot
Performance outcomes                        Acceptable outcomes                                                 Response      Comment
PO1 Erosion prone areas in a coastal        AO1.1 Where reconfiguring a lot is proposed within the              P/S           The site is wholly included within the Coastal Management
management district are maintained as       coastal management district, the erosion prone area                               District (CMD) and partly included in the Erosion Prone Area
development free buffers, or where          within the lot, or land within 40 metres of the foreshore                         under State mapping. The accuracy of this mapping is
permanent buildings or structures exist,    (whichever is greater), is surrendered to the State for                           questioned as the site is not subject to inundation by the
coastal erosion risks are avoided or        public use unless:                                                                highest astronomical tide nor is it as risk from sear erosion.
mitigated.                                  (1) the development is in a port or is for coastal-                               A detail survey undertaken by RPS and included on the
                                                 dependent development, or                                                    Proposal Plans at Appendix B of this report clearly
                                            (2) the surrender of the land will not enhance coastal                            identifies the HAT and the 40m offset from same. It is clear
                                                 management outcomes, for example, because there                              that the proposed residential allotments and the proposed
                                                 is already substantial development seaward of the lot.                       drainage lot (lot 900) are clear of HAT and the 40m offset.
                                            Editor’s note: Land surrendered to the State for public use under                 The remaining proposed lot 900 is intended to be dedicated
                                            AO1.1 is to be:                                                                   for the purposes of reserve and will therefore not be subject
                                            (1)   placed in a State land reserve for beach protection and                     to future development.
                                                  coastal management purposes under the Land Act 1994,                        On this basis, it is contended that the proposed
                                                  with local government as trustee, or                                        development is compatible with the level of severity of the
                                            (2)   managed for beach protection and coastal management
                                                  purposes under another management regime to the
                                                                                                                              coastal hazard applicable to the subject land.


State development assessment provisions                                       Module 10 — Coastal protection               10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
20 June 2014 V1.4                                                                                                                                                                    Page 15 of 16