Council archive · source document
Appendix H - SDAP Response · REC15/0011
Attached to the e-mail REC15/0011 - Development Application for Reconfiguration of a lot - 1 lot into 11 lots plus balance lot - Appendices F, G, H & I email 2 of 2.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
the proposed drainage lot (lot 800) are offset 40m from
surveyed HAT of Wooroi Creek.
The proposed residential allotments are also predominantly
located above 5m AHD (with the exception of a small
section of proposed lots 3 – 5). Likewise, the proposed
drainage lot (lot 800) is located above 4m AHD.
Our client, who has been a resident of the subject land for in
excess of 60 years, also confirms that previous flooding
events on the subject land have not resulted in water
extending above the surveyed top of bank notated on the
Proposal Plans included at Appendix C. It is noted that all of
the proposed residential allotments as well as the proposed
drainage lot (lot 900) are located well above the top of bank.
It is contended that sufficient flood immunity is provided to
the proposed development.
PO4 Development avoids the release of AO4.1 Development that involves the manufacture or N/A The proposed development does not involve the
hazardous materials as a result of a storage of hazardous materials in bulk are designed to: manufacture or storage of hazardous materials.
natural hazard event. (1) prevent the intrusion of waters from a defined storm
Editor’s note: Applications should: tide event into structures or facilities containing the
hazardous materials, or
(1) assess the risk of storm tide inundation
(2) ensure hazardous materials remain secured despite
releasing or otherwise exposing
hazardous materials, including inundation, including secure from the effects of
appropriate emergency planning and hydrodynamic forcing associated with wave action or
contingency measures. flowing water.
(2) applications are to be supported by a
report certified by a Registered
Professional Engineer of Queensland
(RPEQ) that demonstrates this
performance outcome will be achieved.
PO5 Natural processes and the AO5.1 Development in an erosion prone area within the The proposed development will not impact on natural
protective function of landforms and coastal management district: process and the protective function of landforms and
vegetation are maintained in coastal (1) maintains vegetation on coastal landforms where its vegetation on the subject land below the surveyed HAT and
hazard areas. removal or damage may: 40m offset denoted on the Proposal Plans at Appendix B.
(a) destabilise the area and increase the potential
for erosion, or
(b) interrupt natural sediment trapping processes or
dune or land building processes
(2) maintains sediment volumes of dunes and near-shore
coastal landforms, or where a reduction in sediment
volumes cannot be avoided, increased risks to
development from coastal erosion are mitigated by
location, design, construction and operating
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
20 June 2014 V1.4 Page 3 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix H - SDAP Response.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 87 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.