Att 2_Detailed Assessment_030620 · 51994.1249.01

  d) allow for landscaping to be provided between
  buildings;
  e) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of
  buildings and landscape elements within the
  street;
  f) protect public safety and property within
  erosion prone areas by ensuring such areas are
  maintained largely free of development; and
  g) help protect the natural character and visual
  amenity of coastal areas and watercourses.

Discussion: The proposal has been assessed against Schedule 1. The setbacks relevant to each element
are set out and discussed below.

   1.   Café outdoor dining area extension
   2.   New awning over Hastings Street side of Bellissima Tenancy
        The front (Hastings Street) setbacks for a Café and a Shop are set out in Table 1-1:

                Table 1-1 In the Noosa Heads Locality for the northern side of Hastings Street—
                a) 2m, average of 4m from the front boundary to Hastings Street for the ground floor
                and 2nd storey;
                b) 7m from the front boundary to Hastings Street above the 2nd storey; and
                c) 10m from the front boundary to The Parade (beach).

        Each of the proposed elements are single storey and are therefore permitted to be 2m from the
        boundary, with an average setback of 4m. The proposed awning at 3.45m complies with the
        minimum setback. The proposed outdoor dining area extension is setback approx. 1.5m from
        the front alignment to the dining area whilst the roof over extends to within approx. 0.5m. The
        setback definition allows for roof overhangs to extend up to 600mm into the setback area,
        making the roof over technically non-compliant by 900mm.

        It is noted that overall, the development generally meets the 4m average setback under the
        code.

        These variations are assessed against the Specific Outcome at the end of this section.

   3.   New awning over western side of Bellissima tenancy
        The side setbacks for Retail Business Type 2 are not defined by Table 1-1, 1-2 or 1-3 and
        therefore the Scheme refers to siting provisions under Parts 11 and 12 of the QDC.

        These parts of the QDC do not exist therefore it is not clear what setbacks apply in this instance.
        Having said that it is clear that large parts of the existing building are built to the western
        boundary and as such the proposed setback of approx. 0.5m is considered appropriate and
        consistent with the existing form.

   4.   New roof over foyer entry and car set down area
        These elements relate to the resort, and are therefore subject to the setbacks of Table 1-3, being:

                Multiple housing Type 4 Conventional
                Frontage—6m for 2 storey buildings

        These areas are in excess of 17m from Hastings Street and therefore comply with Table 1-3 and
        the Probable Solution.

   5.   Extension of fire stairs
   6.   Extension of lift to roof
   7.   Covered walkway links to stairs on level 4
   8.   Feature pergolas in rooftop terraces
        These elements do not affect setbacks. No further assessment is required.

3 June 2020                                                                                         4