Council archive · source document
Att 2_Detailed Assessment_030620 · 51994.1249.01
9. New Awnings (above third level, beach side)
This element also relates to the resort and so Table 1-3 applies. The awnings are setback
approximately 11.2m where Table 1-3 permits a setback to the beach of 6m for the first 2 storeys
and 8m for each storey thereafter. As the awnings are part of the third storey, an 8m setback
applies. The awning therefore exceeds the Probable Solution.
10. New awning structure above seated area at NW corner for increased weather protection
11. New rear entry structure between the building and the beach for increased weather protection
12. New day bed pergola structure between the building and the beach
These features are all landscaped elements and will be constructed from a variety of primarily
transparent materials including Perspex sheeting and spaced timber to maintain sightlines.
These elements will have a positive impact on the visual amenity and usability of the common
areas and are therefore considered appropriate. No further assessment is considered necessary.
13. New amenities and entry structures to “Sails”
The side setbacks for Retail Business Type 2 are not defined by Table 1-1, 1-2 or 1-3 and
therefore the Scheme refers to siting provisions under Parts 11 and 12 of the QDC.
These parts of the QDC do not exist therefore it is not clear what setbacks apply in this instance.
Having said that it is clear that parts of the existing building are built close to or on the eastern
boundary and as such the proposed setbacks of approx. 0.5m (at the closest) is considered
appropriate and consistent with the existing form.
14. New shopfront and roof over “Rumba Bar” as well as extension of Fire Stair 01
This element is well setback from the frontages and side boundaries and therefore comply with
the Probable Solution.
On account of the minor variations proposed for the Providore Café outdoor dining area and the
Bellissima tenancy’s awning facing Hastings Street, the proposal does not completely meet S8.1.
Therefore, an assessment against the corresponding specific outcome, O8, is necessary. O8 has been
assessed below.
O8 (a) states: provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses
Discussion: A review of the adjoining uses in all directions, finds that there is unlikely to be any
significant negative impacts as a result of encroachments from the proposed structures.
The structures proposed on Hasting’s Street are setback in excess of 20m from the
structures on adjoining sites in all directions. This is considered more than adequate.
No further assessment is required.
The side awning will not encroach on any adjoining land use and in fact will provide a
positive contribution in terms of weather protection to the pedestrian access and public
toilet area between Netanya and the surf club.
O8 (b) states: preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer the proposed building;
O8 (c) states: allow for landscaping to be provided between buildings;
Discussion: The plan indicate that any of the significant trees along the site’s frontage will be
retained and incorporated into new landscaped areas. These will continue to provide
landscape between and buffering to the buildings.
O8 (d) states: maintain the visual continuity and pattern of buildings and landscape elements within
the street;
3 June 2020 5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Att 2_Detailed Assessment_030620.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
Att 2_Detailed Assessment_030620.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
Att 2_Detailed Assessment_030620.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
Att 2_Detailed Assessment_030620.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
Att 2_Detailed Assessment_030620.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
Att 2_Detailed Assessment_030620.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 223 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.