Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2017-09-12 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda

of 70

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (16.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   12 SEPTEMBER 2017


                                                       Attachment 1




                                                         Page 45 of 70

SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                         12 SEPTEMBER 2017

                                                                                                                 Attachment 1

                                              avo4l@l are] MUAAca iL ekel fata lOlAUen
                                                Facilitated by University of Canberra

                    a   r           ¥                      \       rl         ¥           }                 mi          ¥
                 re a | if       Wl       7                   wT. ¢ if   fui ae    ey                ee aa if      bd ale     e
       Poe  eS Si. ARUN  MELE     FDO             MO EN SL       URN MOTE   B,D AO        RMON ONS Se   MAMA    AIRT IR, FER Ag om
      a a Nae a: Wes AA. Oh                  a Ba ‘) We ate             3 a    Oh a eH ys          Nad a yee a ¥; ‘i a
     y 7             ly   P 3h:   4 ye ri          y            &%  ose    We rY           (i 7           %    ot    We wm
       ve           Nas    Vey:    "bet       aA  Ves (1a 4   DD hae VES A:  ype   ee        ss     ,   Nag    a et      ae
     a        .             os   tel                                     tl      fe                                tad     fe
       re    :   7        |      ee               YW    ha          | Wee                   Ye    i           |      ee
       te ee 8   a        a                      te Re 8   %             err    5          ote Bee #  4        (are       "

              Introduction: Noosa did well in response rate
                 In 2016 the University of Canberra held the Regional Wellbeing Survey for the ninth time. Noosa Council created
                 the How happy is Noosa? campaign to encourage the community to participate in this survey. The reason Council
                 became involved was firstly to gauge how the community felt about their personal and the community’s wellbeing.
                 Secondly, Council was interested in finding where Noosa people felt there were issues in liveability in the shire for
                 further planning and decision-making processes.
                 12,891 people from rural and regional Australia took part in the survey, 1,953 from regional Queensland, with
                 Noosa representing 320 of those responses. Comparable other areas received a response rate of 45 (Sunshine
                 Coast), and 105 (Gold Coast, Ipswich, Lockyer Valley, Logan, Moreton Bay, Redland, Scenic Rim and Somerset),
                 showing that Noosa offered a markedly greater response as a result of the How Happy is Noosa? campaign.
                 To demonstrate the success of the Noosa campaign, we can compare to the Bega Valley Shire in NSW that received
                 the most results the previous year, with 248 people responding to the survey, while Noosa achieved 320 responses
                 this year. Bega Valley Shire also invested $3,500 to achieve this result, while Noosa Council spent nothing. We did
                 good!
              Results: Noosa did well in results too!
                Results from the University of Canberra were presented as tables of comparison between Noosa’s results and those
                of rural and regional Australia, rural and regional Queensland, Southern Coastal Queensland (Gold Coast, Ipswich,
                Lockyer Valley, Logan, Moreton Bay, Redland, Scenic Rim and Somerset), and the Sunshine Coast. This document
                has been adapted from those results, with focus specifically being on comparisons between the Noosa Shire results
                and those of regional Australia and Queensland, as there was little response from and consequently little data from
                the Sunshine Coast and Southern Coastal Queensland that is comparable. Data was sourced from the 2016 Regional
                Wellbeing Survey, QLD Southern Coastal and Sunshine Coast region data tables, Version 1.01 July 2017. Results
                include community responses to survey questions regarding:
                     °    Personal Wellbeing                          °     Social Connectedness
                     °     Community Wellbeing                                            .
                                    fi    .        |                  e     Access to Services
                     °     Personal Financial Wellbeing                       ;                     ‘
                           -        bier      ‘italia!                e     Crime and Safety Perceptions
                     .      OmMUNIEY economic     EEING:              e     Landscape and Aesthetics
                     °     Health Wellbeing                                       4       ‘
                                    .          .             .        °     Perceived Environmental Health
                     °     Community Leadership & Collaboration

                The results show that Noosa residents’ sense of wellbeing exceeds those of regional Australia and Queensland in
                most cases. The only incidence of Noosa falling behind other areas is in our perception of crime and safety. It
                should be emphasised that these are perceptions only.
             Where to from here?
               While the comparisons between Noosa and regional Australia and Queensland are insightful, the value of this data
               is in its ability to provide a baseline for further comparisons of Noosa residents’ sense of wellbeing as the survey is
               performed annually. It is suggested that these results are used as a mechanism to engage the Noosa community in
               participating in the survey again next year and in subsequent years, with numbers of participants growing as
               community awareness of the survey grows.

                                                     jefe] NOOSA COUNCIL

                                                                                                                     Page 45 of 70
Log in to download the original file

2017-09-12 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda(PDF, 16MB).pdf · 16.3 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.