Original source · versioned page text
2020-01-16 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 16 JANUARY 2020
1.1. Element 1 Strategy 1 as it fosters retail employment rather than employment
in the export oriented and high-value sectors;
1.2. Element 1 Strategy 7 as it is using land set aside for non-retail employment
which inhibits the ability of Noosa Shire to meet employment planning
baselines;
2. The proposal does not support the Economic Vision for the Shire to create the
strong viable niche economy articulated at 1.4.3 of Division 2 Part 1 of Noosa Plan
thereby protecting and enhancing the Noosa brand as the proposal introduces a
small second shopping centre into the Noosa Business Centre limiting available
land for growth in identified priority focus areas of wellness industries, knowledge-
based businesses, education and service industries, heritage and creative arts
industries.
3. The proposal, being predominantly retail, is contrary to the Desired Environmental
Outcomes 3.1.3 b) i, ii & iii of the Noosa Plan as:
3.1. Further large format retail is not envisaged for the centre with a proportion
of Noosa’s Shire’s higher order needs intended to be fulfilled by the Principal
Regional activity Centre of Maroochydore; and
3.2. It will impact on the long term viability of the Noosa Business Centre, as the
principal business, retail and administrative centre.
4. The development application proposes uses which are inconsistent in the Shire
Business Centre zone precincts B3 and E5.
5. The proposed development is contrary Overall Outcomes 11.7.2 tt) ii, x, xi B & C
of to the Noosaville Locality Code as the proposed extent of retail is not planned
and significantly exceeds the retail caps set by the Noosa Plan; and
5.1. will not support the growth of the Noosa Business Centre as being a multi-
function employment node which provides for a wide range of business uses;
5.2. will not retain the development capacity within the centre in the longer term
to take advantage of potential new employment opportunities.
6. The proposed built form, design and layout does not comply with Overall Outcomes
11.7.2 tt iv, v & viii of the Noosaville Locality Code as:
6.1. the proposal has the characteristics of a standard retail commercial design
without the architectural features unique to Noosa;
6.2. overall the built form is more suited to retail uses than to the other uses
proposed such as low impact industry;
6.3. the applicant has not demonstrated that some buildings will be sufficiently
screened from Council’s major road network;
6.4. building 4 exceeds the maximum building height for the area and has a
reduced building setback from Hofmann Drive; and
6.5. pedestrian connectivity and access is poor.
7. The proposal does not satisfy Specific Outcome O28 of the Landscaping Code
and O17 of the Driveway and Carparking Code as the car parking area is deficient
in landscaping with unsatisfactory provision for shade trees.
8. The proposal is significantly deficient in car parking and does not comply with
Specific Outcome O7 of the Noosa Plan’s Driveways and Car parking Code.
9. The applicant has not satisfactorily demonstrated that the development will not
adversely impact on the external traffic network contrary to Overall Outcomes tt) ix
of the Noosaville Locality Code and 14.142.2 a) of the Transport, Roads and
Drainage Code.
Page 5 of 15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.