Original source · versioned page text
2020-01-16 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 16 JANUARY 2020
10. The applicant has not demonstrated that stormwater management can be
successfully and appropriately integrated into the current development layout
consistent with 14.157.2 of the Water Sensitive Design Code and Specific
Outcome O8 of the Transport, Roads and Drainage Code.
11. The proposal includes clearing of significant vegetation as part of the proposed
measures for stormwater management contrary to the purpose of current
environmental covenants registered over the site and the Noosaville Locality Code
requirements for Precinct OS3 Specific Outcomes O218 to O222 and Precinct OS6
Specific Outcomes O224 & O225.
12. The proposal does not comply with the draft Noosa Plan as:
12.1. the quantum of retail proposed is not envisaged on the site and does not
advance nor assist in preparing for a transitioning or changing economy
contrary to Strategic Intent 3.2.6 - A diverse and resilient economy and
Strategic Outcomes 3.3.5(r) and (s)(i)(B);
12.2. the proposal is not contributing to the key priority sectors identified in
Strategic Intent 3.2.6;
12.3. the proposal does not comply with PO1 of the Transport Code and PO6 of
the Driveways and Parking Code as carparking is grossly deficient and the
applicant has not demonstrated there will not be adverse effects on the
surrounding traffic network;
12.4. the development does not comply with Overall Outcomes 6.4.1.2 (3)(c) (iii)
& 3(f) of the Major Centre Zone Code as it does not reflect appropriate
subtropical design and is not distinctively recognisable as being Noosa Style;
and
12.5. the stormwater management of the site does not comply with the Water
Quality and Drainage Code Outcomes PO7 and PO11.
13. There is no significant need for the proposed retail and the proposal fails to
advance the priority sectors envisaged by Noosa’s Local Economic Plan.
14. The proposed uses are clearly defined by The Noosa Plan and the applicant’s
proposed use definitions are unnecessary, inappropriate and have the potential to
cause confusion.
15. There are no discretionary matters which would warrant approval of the
development proposal.
16. For the aforesaid reasons, approval of the development proposal would not
advance the purpose of the Planning Act 2016.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
Carried unanimously.
4 MCU18/0165.01 REQUEST TO CHANGE A DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR MATERIAL
CHANGE OF USE OF PREMISES - MULTIPLE HOUSING TYPE 4 CONVENTIONAL (17
UNITS) AT 25 KAURI STRET, COOROY
Council Resolution
Moved: Cr Glasgow
Seconded: Cr Wilkie
That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment
Committee Meeting dated 13 January 2020 regarding Application No. MCU18/0165.01 to
make a minor change to an existing approval for Material Change of Use of Premises (Multiple
Housing Type 4 Conventional) situated at 25 Kauri St Cooroy and:
Page 6 of 15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.