Original source · versioned page text
2015-11-10 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (15.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Page 180 of 201
OUR CUSTOMERS
Measure Measure
Number of requests received x month % of requests completed within target date x month
Purpose Purpose
Level of customer demand & whether service levels appropriate Indicator of whether service levels are satisfactory
1750. =H SS TY 100% = — — — WAN Ha.
1500 +
80%
1250 +
1000 60% 7
750 40%
500
20%
250 +
0+ T T T T T T T T T r T 1 0% + r T T T T r T T T T T 7
x RY © \ sv o oO \
ys pe? oe o we & es <2 we se RX y? ys pe? oe o w Sod y <® we es we y?
Comment Comment
Accuracy of data cannot be validated. Further analysis taking place.
Measure Measure
Average seconds of "wait" time in phone queue % of planning applications decided within 20 business days
Purpose Purpose
Service timeliness / capacity to respond Service timeliness
0, .
120 100%
80%
90
60%
60
40%
30 20%
0 0%
+ 6 Wo S oe S os July Aug Sept
yp POM WoW '“g we ww ys uMCU uReconfiguration wOp Works Op Works (Veg) PBA mRAP wTotal
Ree) SL SS od BD
Comment
In July, 6 MCUs were decided in excess of 20 business days as they were reported to Council. In August, 6
MCUs were decided in excess of 20 business days, with 3 due to negotiation with the applicant for changed
plans, 1 reported to Council and 2 sited by officers due to workload. In September, 18 MCUs were decided
with 9 being decided in excess of 20 business days. Of these 9, 6 were reported to a Council meeting.
In August, of the 2 REC applications, 1 exceeded the time frame due to difficulties calculating the
Infrastructure Charge while Infrastructure Charges Coordinator was on leave
In July, 1 RAP was reported to a Council meeting.
Benchmark Is shown by red line, Previous year data Is shown by purple line
Page 180 of 201See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.