Original source · versioned page text
Appendix H. Planning Scheme Code Responses
Attached to the e-mail Retail Bus Type 5 & Type 2 & Op Works Economic Report & PScheme Code Response - MCU17/0572 & OPW17/0611.
INFRASTRUCTURE USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Environment & heritage values Complies with specific outcomes
O8 There are no significant adverse effects No solution provided. The proposed development will not adversely impact the
on the biodiversity, natural vegetation, environment.
native wildlife, habitats, landscape quality, Advisory note
water quality or heritage values, including PSP24 – Effluent Disposal details Due to the greater probability of oil and petroleum
those related to— requirements for the design and siting of spillage within the site special precautions will be taken
(a) changes to natural drainage; effluent disposal systems where located to ensure integrity of the surrounding environment and
(b) disturbance to any of the wetland outside a sewerage service area. downstream stormwater catchment. The site has been
systems; Compliance with PSP24 will be considered divided into two (2) catchments, a high-risk area and a
(c) management of landslide and fire as part of Council’s assessment of the low-risk area. A Gross Pollutant Trap (GPT) (SPEL
risk; plumbing and drainage application. Ecoceptor or approved equivalent) will be installed prior
(d) erosion and the transport of to the site’s discharge to remove oils and grits commonly
sediments offsite; encountered on surfaces trafficked by motor vehicles.
(e) unmanaged public access;
(f) effluent disposal; A SPEL Puraceptor unit or approved equivalent is
(g) changes to fauna habitat and proposed to treat runoff from the high-risk area before
behaviour; and returning filtered run-off to the low risk drainage system
(h) disturbance of buildings and features, for further treatment.
including natural features, of heritage
significance.
Table 14-18 – Service & Utility Type 2 - Installation
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.42 Effects of use
O9 Electricity transmission line easements S9.1 A minimum separation distance is N/A Not Applicable
are managed to ensure— maintained from the electricity
(a) the continuation of the transmission of transmission line to the closest boundary of
bulk electricity; habitable buildings and child activity areas,
(b) safety and amenity for residents, as follows—
occupiers and land uses in close (a) 20m for transmission lines up to
proximity; 132kV;
(c) natural environmental values are not (b) 30m for transmission lines between
adversely impacted upon; and 133kV and 275kV; and
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.