Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

ASTP-Rspns_To_RFI

of 15

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

22. Underground infrastructure                                                          Refer to the Engineer’s response letter in Attachment 3.
The submitted documentation indicate that the proposed works is to be constructed
in close proximity (above and adjacent) to existing Unitywater infrastructure and no
relocation point to the existing water meter has been proposed. A statement from
Unitywater approving the locality of the proposed works to their existing
infrastructure has not been provided.

Information Required
Provide an additional statement from a Unitywater representative authorising the
locality of these works and the relocation of the water meter
23. Lawful point of discharge                                                           Refer to the Engineer’s response letter in Attachment 3.
According to Council standards, the maximum discharge flow rate to a Lawful Point
of Discharge is 25l/s in a 1% AEP event. The submitted documentation indicates that
the maximum site discharge to each kerb adapter is 14l/s in a 5% AEP event. Council
are concerned that the discharge flows from each kerb adapter in a 1% AEP event
may create a worsening of existing drainage conditions and potential traffic hazards.

Information Required
Provide additional detail considering the discharge rate in a 1% AEP event and
demonstrating that this discharge rate will not create a worsening of conditions or
potential creation of traffic hazards along Coral Tree Avenue if a 1% AEP event
occurred. This detail must be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ –
Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland).
24. Street trees                                                                        Please refer to the revised Landscape Plans in Attachment 5. Further, please refer to
Council would prefer the removal of both the existing trees (marked as                  the Landscape Architect’s response to Items 16 and 17 above, which addresses Item
‘removal/relocation’ and ‘to be retained’) and be replaced with a suitable street       24 of the Information Request.
tree.

Information Required




  Our ref: 220417                                                                                                                                           Page 14 of 15
Log in to download the original file

ASTP-Rspns_To_RFI.pdf · 551 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.