Council archive · source document
Decision Notice - 010.2008.00001795.001 [As Published] · 152008.1795
Officer: Cherie Moira O'Sullivan
Direct Telephone: (07) 5449 5177
Response Address: PO Box 141, Tewantin QLD 4565
Email: [email protected]
Our Reference: 2008/1795
Your Reference:
27 November 2008
Anita Allen
CARE Ken Hicks & Associates Pty Ltd
PO Box 6380
MAROOCHYDORE BC QLD 4558
Dear Sir/Madam,
Decision Notice
Integrated Planning Act 1997
I refer to your application and advise that on 26 November 2008 Council decided to approve the
application in full subject to conditions.
Details of the decision are as follows:
1 APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No: 2008/1795
Street address: 40 The Anchorage NOOSAVILLE, 44 The Anchorage
NOOSAVILLE
Real property description: LOT: 788 RP: 910421, LOT: 1 SP: 116622
Planning Scheme: The Noosa Plan
2 DECISION DETAILS
The following type of approval has been issued:
Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot - Boundary Realignment
3 RELEVANT PERIOD OF APPROVAL
The relevant period for this Development Approval is identified in the Assessment Manager
conditions.
4 ASSESSMENT MANAGER CONDITIONS
1. Pursuant to Section 3.5.21(2)(a) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the relevant period is
two (2) years from the day this permit takes effect during which time all conditions must have
been complied with, and the Plan of Survey lodged with Sunshine Coast Regional Council
(Council) for endorsement.
2. In conjunction with the lodgement of the Plan of Survey for Council endorsement, legal
documentation must be presented to Council and must be submitted in the correct form with
the fees prescribed in Council's adopted fee schedule.
Page 1 of 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 5 pages
Page 2
2008/1795
3. Pursuant to Section 3.7.3(3)(b) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, all outstanding rates and
charges due and payable to Sunshine Coast Regional Council in respect of the lots being
reconfigured must be paid prior to endorsement of the Survey Plan.
4. Legal documentation provided with the Plan of Survey lodged for endorsement must include
certification from the surveyor stating that all infrastructure belonging Lot 788 on RP910421
and Lot 1 on SP116622, except as modified herein, is contained wholly within each new
individual allotment.
5. The boundary realignment between Lot 788 on RP910421 (Lot 788) and Lot 1 on SP116622
(Lot 1) must be as shown on the approved plan 08096OT dated 8 October 2008 as submitted
by Ken Hicks and Associates except as modified herein.
6. Any changes required by Council’s Solicitor must be attended to prior to endorsing the Plan of
Survey.
Any necessary Titles Office forms requiring the consent of Council is to be submitted prior to
the endorsing of the Plan of Survey.
Water Mains and Connections
7. Each new individual allotment must be connected to Council’s existing town water supply in
accordance with Council’s standards and requirements at no cost to Council.
8. Each individual water connection to the water reticulation system must extend to the property
boundary and be metered. All fees for the supply of water meters must be paid to the Council.
9. All water meters must be located outside the property boundary and in an easily assessable
location to facilitate unhindered reading by Council and/or Council’s contracted water meter
readers, and not behind fences or locked gates. In this regard approval of the water meter
configuration and location must be obtained from Council’s CEO prior to endorsement of the
Plan of Survey.
Services
10. The requirements for TELECOMMUNICATION services shall be satisfied in relation to the
provision of telephone services to each new individual allotment. In this regard written
confirmation from an approved telecommunication agency stating that each new individual
allotment are serviced by appropriate telecommunication services shall be submitted to the
Council prior to Council endorsing the Plan of Survey.
11. An underground electricity service must be provided to each new individual allotment. An
approved ENERGEX Electrical Design Consultant shall prepare detailed designs of the
electrical proposal to serve the lots, unless already provided.
The detailed deigns shall then be submitted to ENERGEX for approval and a copy of their
approval submitted to Council in conjunction with a “Certificate of Electricity Supply for
Proposed Subdivisions” (prepared by an approved ENERGEX Electrical Design Consultant)
prior to Council endorsing the Plan of Survey.
Any agreement with ENERGEX or an approved ENERGEX Electrical Design Consultant shall
be wholly at the applicant’s expense and shall not entail a financial encumbrance on future
purchasers of Lot 788.
Easement for Services
12. In conjunction with the endorsement of the Plan of Survey by Council, the applicant shall
create a registered easement over any infrastructure for electricity and telecommunication as
may be required by the service providers.
General
13. Any alteration of a public utility or other facility necessitated by the boundary realignment or
associated construction works either internal or external to the site shall be at no cost to
Council.
Page 2 of 6
Page 3
2008/1795
5 REFERRAL AGENCY CONDITIONS
Nor Applicable.
6 APPROVED PLANS
The approved plans for this development approval are listed in the following table:
Plan No. Rev. Plan Name Date
080960T Proposed Boundary Realignment 8 October 2008
7 ADVISORY NOTES
The following Advisory Notes are for information purposes only and do not form conditions of
approval:
1. For the purpose of these conditions, the following definitions apply: -
1.1. A Plan of Survey means the plan for the reconfiguration of a lot required to be
endorsed by Council pursuant to S3.7.1 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997.
1.2. The person acting on this permit means any person or company who undertakes
development pursuant to this permit.
1.3. Each new individual allotment means Lot 788 on RP910421 and Lot 1 on SP116622
as shown on approved plan 08096OT dated 8 October 2008 as submitted by Ken
Hicks and Associates except as modified herein.
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
There may be a requirement to establish a Cultural Heritage Management Plan and/or obtain
approvals pursuant to the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (ACH Act).
The ACH Act establishes a cultural heritage duty of care which provides that: “A person who carries
out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not
harm Aboriginal cultural heritage”. It is an offence to fail to comply with the duty of care. Substantial
monetary penalties may apply to individuals or corporations breaching this duty of care. Injunctions
may also be issued by the Land and Resources Tribunal, and the Minister administering the ACH Act
can also issue stop orders for an activity that is harming or is likely to harm Aboriginal cultural
heritage or the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
You should contact the Cultural Heritage Co-ordination Unit on 07 3238 3838 to discuss any
obligations under the ACH Act.
8 PROPERTY NOTES
Not Applicable.
9 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OVERRIDING SCHEME
Not Applicable.
10 FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED
Type of Development Permit required Subject of the required Development Permit
Not Applicable
11 SELF ASSESSABLE CODES
Not Applicable.
Page 3 of 6
Page 4
2008/1795
12 SUBMISSIONS
Not Applicable.
13 REASONS / GROUNDS FOR APPROVAL DESPITE CONFLICT WITH SCHEME
Not Applicable.
14 RIGHTS OF APPEAL
You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the
Integrated Planning Act 1997 is attached.
During the appeal period, you as the applicant may make written representations to Council about
the conditions contained within the development approval. If Council agrees or part agrees with the
representations, a “negotiated decision notice” will be issued. Only one “negotiated decision notice”
may be given. Taking this step will defer your appeal period, which will continue after Council makes
its decision. (Refer to sections 3.5.17 and 3.5.18 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997).
15 OTHER DETAILS
Should you wish to obtain more information about Council’s decision electronic copies are available
on line at www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au, or at Council Offices.
Yours faithfully
Mark Lewis
ACTING MANAGER – LAND DEVELOPMENT
Page 4 of 6
Page 5
2008/1795
Appeal Rights
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 & 1998 REGULATION
The following is an extract from the Integrated
(6) If an application involves assessment against a
Planning Act (Chapter 4). concurrence agency code, appeal rights for submitters
Division 8 - Appeals to court relating to for the application are not available against the part of
development applications the approval that represents the concurrence agency’s
response for the code.
Appeals by applicants
Appeals by advice agency submitters
4.1.27.(1) An applicant for a development application
may appeal to the court against any of the following- 4.1.29.(1) An advice agency may, within the limits of
its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about the giving of a
(a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of a development development approval for a development application
application; if-
(b) a matter stated in a development approval, (a) the development application involves impact
including any condition applying to the assessment; and
development, and the identification of a code
under section 3.1.6;1 (b) the advice agency told the applicant and the
assessment manager to treat its response to the
(c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a application as a submission for an appeal.
development permit was applied for;
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
(d) the length of a currency period; days after the day the decision notice or negotiated
(e) a deemed refusal. decision notice is given to the advice agency as a
(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a) to (d) must submitter.
be started within 20 business days (the “applicant’s Appeals for matters arising after approval given
appeal period”) after the day the decision notice or (co-respondents)
negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant. 4.1.30.(1) For a development approval given for a
(3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be development application, a person to whom any of the
started at any time after the last day a decision on the following notices have been given may appeal to the
matter should have been made. court against the decision in the notice-
Appeals by submitters (a) a notice giving a decision on a request for
4.1.28.(1) A submitter for a development application extension of the currency period for an approval;
may appeal to the court about- (b) a notice giving a decision on a request to make a
(a) the giving of a development approval, including minor change to an approval.
any conditions (or lack of conditions) or other (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
provisions of the approval; or days after the day the notice of the decision is given to
(b) the length of a currency period for the approval. the person.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business (3) Subsection (1)(a) does not apply if the
days (the “submitters appeal period”) after the day approval resulted from a development application
the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is (superseded planning scheme) that was assessed as
given to the submitter. if it were an application under a superseded planning
scheme.
(3) If a person withdraws a submission before the
application is decided, the person may not appeal the (4) Also, a person who has made a request
decision. mentioned in subsection (1) may appeal to the court
against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4) If an application involves both impact
assessment and code assessment, appeal rights for (5) An appeal under subsection (4) may be started
submitters are available only for the part of the at any time after the last day the decision on the
application involving impact assessment. matter should have been made.
(5) If an application is processed under section Division 9 - Appeals to court about other matters
6.1.28(2), appeal rights for submitters for the Appeals for matters arising after approval given
application are available only for the aspects of the (no co-respondents)
development that would have required public
notification under the repealed Act. 4.1.31.(1) A person to whom any of the following
notices have been given may appeal to the court
against the decision in the notice-
1
(a) a notice giving a decision on a request to change
Section 3.1.6 (Preliminary approval may override or cancel a condition of a development approval.
local planning instrument)
Page 5 of 6
Page 6
2008/1795
(b) a notice under section 6.1.442 giving a decision to (d) the length of a period mentioned in section 3.5.21
change or cancel a condition of a development currency period;
approval. (e) a deemed refusal.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 (2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a) to (d) must
business days after the day the notice of the decision be started within 20 business days (the “applicant’s
is given to the person. appeal period”) after the day the decision notice or
(3) Also, a person who has made a request negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant.
mentioned in subsection (1)(a) may appeal to the (3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be
court against a deemed refusal of the request. started at any time after the last day a decision on the
(4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be matter should have been made.
started at any time after the last day the decision on The Registrar for the Building and Development
the matter should have been made. Tribunal may be contacted at the website
Appeals against decisions to change approval http://www.localgovernment.qld.gov.au/
conditions under the repealed Act
4.1.33A.(1) A person who is dissatisfied with a
For Infrastructure Charges Only
decision made on an application to change the 4.1.36 Appeals about particular infrastructure
conditions attached to an approval given under charges
section 2.19(3)or section 4.4 of the repealed Act may (1) This section applies to a person who has been
appeal to the court against- given, and is dissatisfied with, an infrastructure
(a) the decision; or charges notice or a regulated State infrastructure
(b) a deemed refusal of the application. charges notice.
(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a) must be (2) The person may appeal to the court against the
started within 20 business days after the day notice of notice.
the decision is to be given to the person. (3) The appeal must be started within 20 business
(3) An appeal under subsection (1)(b) may be days after-
started at any time after the last day a decision on the (a) if the notice is given because of a development
matter should have been made. approval or master plan approval-the day the
Appeals against local laws applicant is given notice of the decision about the
approval; or
4.1.33B.(1) An applicant who is dissatisfied with a
decision of a local government or the conditions (b) otherwise-the day the notice is given to the
applied under a local law about the use of premises or person.
the erection of a building or other structure permitted (4) An appeal under this section may only be about-
by the planning scheme may appeal to the court (a) whether a charge in the notice is so
against the decision or the conditions applied. unreasonable that no reasonable relevant local
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business government, State infrastructure provider or
days after the day notice of the decision is given to the coordinating agency could have imposed it; or
applicant. (b) an error in the calculation of the charge.
For Building Works Only (5) To remove any doubt, it is declared that an
Rights of appeal conferred by Section 4.2.9 of the appeal under this section can not be about the
Integrated Planning Act 1997 as follows: methodology used to establish the charge in the
relevant infrastructure charges schedule or regulated
Division 3 – Appeals to tribunals relating to
State infrastructure charges schedule.
development applications
Appeals by applicants
4.2.9(1) An applicant for a development application
may appeal to the Building and Development Tribunal
against any of the following-
(a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of a development
application;
(b) a matter stated in a development approval,
including any condition applying to the
development, and the identification of a code
under section 3.1.6;3
(c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a
development permit was applied for;
2
Section 6.1.44 (Conditions may be changed or
cancelled by assessment manager or concurrence
agency in certain circumstances)
3
Section 3.1.6 (Preliminary approval may override
local planning instrument)
Page 6 of 6
Used in these records
Decision Notice - 010.2008.00001795.001 [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 53 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.