Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

06/0823 - Change to Development Approval [As Published] · 132006.823.03

of 47

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

e The additional unit area does not increase the Site Cover of Building | as it is wholly contained
within the roof line of this building.

¢ The additional unit area increases the GFA of Building | by 11m?, however is off-set by
changes proposed in Building V as summarised below.

* The unit does not result in any increase in building height in metres or storeys, nor does it
significantly alter the external visual appearance of the building.

Changes to Building V

Given the certification issues associated with the provision of a three storey building versus that of a
two storey building, the provision of a third level staff room in Building V has been deleted.
Accordingly this provides the project with an additional 40m? of approved GFA. Plan detailing this
change are included as Attachment 4.

Previous Public Notification

It is understood that in order for changes to a development approval to be considered as ‘Minor
Changes’ it must be concluded that these changes would not “cause a person to make a properly
made submission objecting to the proposal”. In this regard the following points are provided for
reference:

e A total of six (6) properly made submissions were received during the public notification period
of the current development approval. It is noted that three (3) of these submissions were
duplicates.

e The issues identified in the submissions are summarised as follows:
o Traffic flow along Morwong Drive;
o Height and size of villas;
o Impact of the development upon the adjacent heritage property,
o Impact of the development upon the acoustic & visual amenity enjoyed by users of
other premises;
Impact of the development upon the natural environment
Impact of the development upon the urban character of the locality; and
o Visual impact of car parking.

00

e A response to these issues prepared by Martoo Consulting and dated 9 October 2006 is
included as Attachment 5.

¢ No submissions commented upon the number of accommodation units. Accordingly it is
considered that the changes as proposed would not cause further submissions objecting to
the proposal.

Condition Changes

The proposed changes necessitate the amendment of a small number of conditions. Following is a
suggestion of the proposed amendments. It is noted that given the length of certain conditions, only
the relevant sections have been identified.

Condition 1
1. The development permit for Material Change of Use of Premises is issued for an integrated Resort
comprising:

1.1. Visitor Accommodation- Type 4 Conventional! (Resort),
1.1.1. Resort residential buildings —199 Dwelling Units comprising:
4.1.1.1. 105 by 1 bedroom dwelling units;
1.1.1.2. 47 by 2 bedroom dwelling units;

Used in these records

About this file

File size
5.0 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

06_0823 - Change to Development Approval [As Published].pdf · 5.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.