Council archive · source document
MCU220140- Response to IR · MCU22/0140
Please also note, providing any pathway linking Ruby Street frontage to Opal Street
frontage will have a significant impact on the private open space of Units 3 or 4 in
terms of the privacy and amenity. This would result in these spaces not being able
to operate as intended in the planning scheme.
ITEM 4
Issue
From the proposed layout it is not clear that the vehicles parked within the lots can
leave the site in a forward gear.
Information Required
Demonstrate how compliance with Performance Outcome PO10 of the Driveways
and Carparking Code of the Noosa Plan will be achieved by providing swept paths
for each of the proposed garaged vehicles and visitor space – vehicles must be able
to leave, the site in a forward gear in a total of 3 movements when all other
carparks are occupied.
Applicant’s Response:
Please see Engineering Response Letter prepared by Ingeniir and included as
Appendix B of this response.
ITEM 5
Issue
The submitted documentation indicates that an “in-principle approval for building
over sewer” has been granted by Unity Water.
Information Required
Provide a written copy of Unity Water’s in-principle approval for building over
existing sewer infrastructure.
Applicant’s Response:
Please see Uniter Water in-principle approval letter included as Appendix E of this
response.
ITEMS 6
Issue
The submitted documentation shows that the proposed driveway on Ruby St is to
be located over an existing stormwater gully pit. The applicant proposes to replace
the existing pit with a “V” shaped grate – details of the proposed grate are not
provided.
5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU220140- Response to IR.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 309 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.