Council archive · source document
MCU220140- Response to IR · MCU22/0140
Council is unwilling to approve this solution as “V” shaped grates do not have nearly
the same inlet capacity as the existing lintel and kerb inlet pit. If flows bypass this
pit due to having a “V” shaped drain this may cause on road flooding, etc
downstream.
Information Required
Provide amended plans showing a new inlet pit to the side of the proposed
driveway, having the same lintel and kerb inlet configuration as the existing.
Applicant’s Response:
Please see Engineering Response Letter prepared by Ingeniir and included as
Appendix B of this response to be read in conjunction with the attached Civil
Engineering Plans (Appendix C) and Stormwater Management Plan (Appendix
D).
ITEM 7
Issue
The submitted documentation indicates that:
- most of the site is to be filled, including the area between the two main
buildings;
- surface stormwater in the area between the two main buildings is proposed
to flow to the west – there is no indication of how this water will be captured.
Information Required
Provide an amended Stormwater Management Plan demonstrating how the
proposed stormwater arrangement will not create a worsening of off-site
conditions.
Applicant’s Response:
Please see Engineering Response Letter prepared by Ingeniir and included as
Appendix B of this response to be read in conjunction with the attached Civil
Engineering Plans (Appendix C) and Stormwater Management Plan (Appendix
D).
6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU220140- Response to IR.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 309 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.