Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

REPS - Updated SWMP

of 57

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (15.5 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 4, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Tables
Table 2.1: MUSIC Model Results .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Table 3.1: Water Quality Objectives .................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 3.2: Treated Catchment Properties ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Table 3.3: Rainfall-Runoff Parameters ................................................................................................................................................................. 7
Table 3.4: Pollutant Export Parameters ............................................................................................................................................................... 8
Table 3.5: Bioretention Parameters..................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 3.6: MUSIC Model Results ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10
Table 4.1:WBNM Sub-Catchment Fraction Impervious Values – Existing Scenario ........................................................................................... 13
Table 4.2: Existing Scenario Peak Flows ............................................................................................................................................................. 13
Table 4.3: WBNM Sub-Catchment Fraction Impervious Values – Developed Scenario ..................................................................................... 13
Table 4.4: Peak Discharge Comparison – Existing Vs Developed Sceanrio ........................................................................................................ 14
Table 4.5: Elevation-Storage Data for Approved / Constructed Detention Basin .............................................................................................. 15
Table 4.6: Peak Discharge Comparison – Existing vs Mitigated Scenarios ......................................................................................................... 15
Table 4.7: Peak Discharge Comparison – Existing vs Mitigated Scenarios ......................................................................................................... 16
Table 4.8: WBNM Sub-Catchment Fraction Impervious Values – Developed Scenario ..................................................................................... 17
Table 4.9: 10% AEP flows – Existing vs Mitigated Scenarios .............................................................................................................................. 18




Figures
Figure 1.1: Locality Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
Figure 1.2: New Townhouse Locality ................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 2.1: Stormwater Quality Catchment Plan ................................................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 2.2: Typical Conventional Bioretention Filter Section (Water by Design, 2014) ....................................................................................... 9
Figure 2.3: Music Model Arrangement for Developed Case .............................................................................................................................. 10
Figure 2.1: Existing Scenario Catchment Plan .................................................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 2.2: Developed Scenario Catchment Plan ............................................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 2.3: Excerpt of the Catchment Plan from Design Drawing (catchment 1/3) ........................................................................................... 17
Figure 2.4: Catchment of Gap Flow Reporting South down Starboard Avenue ................................................................................................. 18




73 EUMUNDI - NOOSA ROAD, NOOSAVILLE I BBNE00529_0002_0001-REP-001-2                                                                                                                                             iv
Log in to download the original file

REPS - Updated SWMP.pdf · 15.5 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.