Original source · versioned page text
Appendix 3 - Stormwater quality management plan
Original PDF page 12, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnStormwater Quality Management Plan – Commercial Development at Weyba Road, Noosaville CC-3668
Rainfall Data
Rainfall data for the site was chosen to give the best representation of actual conditions. In
accordance with the recommendations of the MUSIC guidelines for Sunshine Coast (north), a
time period of 10 years between 1973 and 1983 was selected from the Cooroy Composite
station (40059), using a six minute time step. The evapotranspiration data for Sunshine Coast
(north) was also adopted in the model, as per Table 3.1 of the MUSIC guidelines.
Treatment Nodes
The recommended MUSIC values for commercial source nodes have been used in MUSIC to generate
predicted pollutant loads from the site. The following devices have been used in the treatment train
to reduce these pollutant loads to achieve the Water Quality Objectives (WQOs) for this site.
Gross Pollutant Traps – Although not included in the model it is proposed that all stormwater
inlet pits on the site be fitted with a quality gross pollutant trap such as a stormwater 360
enviropod. These devices have not been modelled as they do not contribute to nutrient
removal, which is the critical parameter in regard to utilising a MUSIC model to demonstrate
that WQOs have been achieved by the proposed treatment train.
Rain Water Reuse Tank – 15Kl of rainwater storage has been included in the model with 27% of
the roof area connected to the tank and 73% of the roof area by-passing the tank. An irrigation
reuse rate of 200kl per annum has been set in the model which equates to approximately
435mm of irrigation per annum over 459m2 of landscaping. A daily reuse rate of 0.5Kl/day has
also been modelled to represent 40x8l toilet flushes and 100l for external cleaning. This reuse
rate is considered quite conservative and in reality it is suggested that the non-potable uses
will actually be significantly higher than 0.5Kl/day.
Bio-Retention Device – Designated bio-filtration areas with a total combined surface area of
35m2 have been modelled with extended detention depths of 200mm, sandy loam filter media
depths of 500m and a hydraulic conductivity of 200mm/hr. It is planned to locate the bio-
retention areas within the landscaping throughout the site. Further details of the bio-retention
area and there contributing catchments are shown within the Concept Drainage Layout Plans
prepared by Empire Engineering, attached to this report as Appendix B. An exfiltration rate of
0mm/hr was set for the bio-retention devices, a TN content of filter media of 800mg/kg,
Orthophosphate content of filter media of 55mg/kg, a high flow bypass of 1m³/s and a low flow
bypass set as 0m³/s.
7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.