Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Council archive · source document

response to information request woodland · MCU23/0008

of 6

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

6.    Provide additional detail demonstrating the how the proposed Car Stackers
      will function in the event of a power failure and what impact a power failure
      will have on the overall functionality of the carpark.
7.    Provide additional detail demonstrating how the parking arrangement
      described in Sections 5.4 and 6.0 of Fernway Engineering’s Traffic Impact
      Statement dated December 2022 will function. The additional detail must
      include, but not be limited to:
      a. demonstrate where staff with a SUV will park; and
      b. demonstrate if a customer with a Sedan can safely park in the ‘lower’
         carpark.
8.    Provide additional detail demonstrating how the proposed Car Stackers will
      function when both ‘upper’ and ‘lower’ parks are occupied. The additional
      detail must include, but not be limited to:
      a. demonstrate how tenancy staff parked in the ‘upper’ carpark will access
         their vehicle in the event the ‘lower’ customer park is occupied;
      b. demonstrate how the owner of a vehicle parked in the ‘lower’ customer
         carpark will be identified and their vehicle moved in the event tenancy staff
         parked in the ‘upper’ carpark needs to leave the development (e.g.,
         emergency); and
      c. provide comment discussing if it is practical and reasonable, given the
         proposed medical use of the development, to identify and approach a
         customer to relocate their vehicle.
9.    Provide additional detail demonstrating how the proposed Car Stackers and
      carparking area will operate when vehicles enter and exit the Car Stackers.
      The detail must assume that all other stackers and spaces are occupied, be
      prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional
      Engineer of Queensland) and include, but not be limited to:
      a. vehicle paths and manoeuvring areas for each vehicle within the site;
      b. demonstrate if the proposal requires the first vehicle to exit the site to
         provide space for the second vehicle to manoeuvre and exit the site; and
      c. demonstrate the required queuing areas within the site.
10.   Provide additional detail demonstrating the proposed carpark has sufficient
      width to provide B99 vehicles with a passing opportunity. The detail must be
      prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional
      Engineer of Queensland) and include, but not be limited to:
      a. demonstrating a B99 vehicle has sufficient area to queue, allow another
         B99 vehicle to manoeuvre and exit any of the carparks and pass.


The car stackers have been removed and a more legible layout connecting to the Peregian
Digital Hub with a reduced GFA is proposed.




                                                                           Page 4 of 6

Used in these records

About this file

File size
984 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

response to information request woodland.pdf · 984 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.