Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

Response to Submissions -commented

Attached to the e-mail Response to amended plans - John Cochrane - MCU21/0110.

of 19

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

    “Adamson Town Planning, specialising in providing higher order town planning
    advice”




                                                      accommodation is to be promoted and managed,
                                                      there is no restriction on the number of units being
                                                      used for permanent residential living 8 . Under the
                                                      planning scheme the “Parkridge Noosa” development
                                                      is located within the TAZ and is intended for visitor
                                                      accommodation, which now is unlikely to be realised.

                                                      In contrast, the proposed development is for purely
                                                      visitor accommodation, to the exclusion of
                                                      permanent residential living, which will provide
                                                      substantial community benefit for reasons already
                                                      explained. The proposed development is for a
                                                      different      development     providing     visitor
                                                      accommodation and does not amount to “double
                                                      dipping”.

A reduction in the number of tennis                   The changes made to the proposal plans include an
courts being currently available                      additional tennis court to maintain the status quo, all
                                                      of which are located within the ROSZ, and a
                                                      consistent Sport and Recreation use. Further, the
                                                      existing tennis pavilion has also been replaced.

A lack of sustainability and energy                   A Sustainability Design Report has been provided as
efficiency                                            Attachment 4 in the application material. The changes
                                                      made to the proposal plans in terms of reducing the
                                                      height of Buildings 4 & 5 has provided areas for
                                                      additional solar panels, which substantially increase
                                                      the amount of solar power (50kVA PV System) able to
                                                      be generated as stated in the advice provided (refer
                                                      Attachment 8).

                                                      A number of sustainability and other energy
                                                      efficiency measures are being adopted for the
                                                      development as explained in the Superior Design
                                                      Outcomes Report (Attachment 8). The applicant is
                                                      committed to providing a high level of sustainability,
                                                      which reduces cost in the long term, by achieving a
                                                      high stand of energy efficiency.

The development does not accord                       It is not agreed that the proposed development does
with reasonable community                             not accord with reasonable community expectations.
expectations for the site                             The subject land was partly included within the TAZ


8
    Refer condition 4 of the development approval issued 23 June 2020

                                                                                                 18 | P a g e
16022 – Noosa Springs “Boutique Hotel”
Log in to download the original file

Response to Submissions -commented.pdf · 960 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.