Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Minor Change Letter

of 7

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

GMA Certification Pty Ltd
  We request that Condition 19 be amended as follows –
   Plan No.                   Rev.                      Plan/Document Name                                   Date
   Additional Plans 23rd of March 2023
   Option B - Entertainment and dining business type 1 – food and beverages on both the lower and upper floors.
   20184339                                  Proposed Floor Plan (1) prepared by Crane
                                A                                                                      13/03/2023
                                             Investments Noosa Pty Ltd
   20184339                     A            Proposed Floor Plan (2) prepared by Crane                 13/03/2023
                                             Investments Noosa Pty Ltd


  The following two (2) tables; being Table 1 and Table 2; will demonstrate that the proposed change meets the
  meaning of ‘minor change’ under Schedule 2 Dictionary of the Planning Act 2016, and that it will not result in
  ‘substantially different development’ as identified in the DA Rules (Version 1.3).

           4.0 Confirmation of Minor Change

  Table 1: Confirmation of Minor Change

   Minor Change Element                                             Statement of Compliance
   (b)        (i) would not result in substantially different      As previously discussed, the subject site is currently
              development;                                         improved by the Hotel Laguna development, which was
                                                                   constructed in the late 1970’s and in accordance with
                                                                   TPC697. This development includes Multiple Dwelling
                                                                   units and recreational facilities to the centre of the lot,
                                                                   including two (2) restaurants; being Miss Moneypenny’s
                                                                   and Piccolino; which are both orientated toward the
                                                                   Hastings Street (northern) frontage.
                                                                   In accordance with Council’s Show Cause Notice and with
                                                                   the proposed plans, this application seeks approval to
                                                                   remove an internal staircase, replace the previously
                                                                   approved ‘fixed’ awning at the front of the building with
                                                                   a retractable awning and for a number of internal
                                                                   modifications over the two (2) levels of the restaurant.
                                                                   As all works are either within or reduce the existing,
                                                                   approved building footprint, it is submitted that the
                                                                   development will not be substantially different.
                                                                   In addition, the development remains fully compliant
                                                                   with the applicable Assessment Benchmarks of the
                                                                   Noosa Plan 2020.
                                                                   Also refer to Table 3 below.
   (b)        (ii) if a development application for the development, including the change, were made when the change
              application is made would not cause—
              (A) the inclusion of prohibited development in The proposed change will not result in the inclusion of
                    the application; or                            prohibited development.
              (B) referral to a referral agency, other than to The development application did not require referral to
                    the chief executive, if there were no referral any referral agencies in this instance.
                    agencies for the development application; or Refer to Part 3 Existing Approvals.
              (C) referral to extra referral agencies, other than Should the application be remade, including the change,
                    to the chief executive; or                     this application would not require referral to additional
                                                                   referral agencies.
              (D) a referral agency, in assessing the Should the application be remade, including the change,
                    application under section 55(2), to assess the there would be no additional matters requiring
                    application against, or have regard to, a assessment.
                    matter, other than a matter the referral
                    agency must have assessed the application
                    against, or had regard to, when the
                    application was made; or

     BUILDING APPROVALS & INSPECTIONS            BUILDING CERTIFICATION                 FIRE SAFETY AUDITS                   Page 4 of 5
Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Letter.pdf · 1.3 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.