Original source · versioned page text
2019-07-09 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 JULY 2019 RECOMMENDATION That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 9 July 2019 regarding Application No. 152006.1999.3 to make a minor change to an existing approval for Reconfiguring a Lot (Subdivision 1 Lot into 52 Lots plus Park) situated at 191 Hollett Rd Noosaville and: A. Refuse the change for the following reasons: 1. The proposed development is inconsistent with the Noosa Plan 2006 in the following respects: I. It is inconsistent with the Strategic Framework of the scheme because: a. The proposed development would result in the fragmentation of agricultural land and would not conserve land for agricultural purposes b. The proposed development would result in residential uses outside of the urban growth boundary. The proposed development is inconsistent with the character and amenity of the locality where conservation and agricultural type land uses are expected II. It is inconsistent with the Tewantin & Doonan Locality Code because: a. The proposed development is not within the Urban Growth Boundary b. The proposed development would not have a density consistent with the environmental constraints of the area and would not offer high levels of amenity or moderate levels of convenience, accessibility and servicing c. The proposed development would not provide a tranquil, bushland setting d. The proposed development would not allow rural land to be protected and managed such that the scenic and environmental values and rural amenity of the locality are preserved e. The proposed development would not retain tall trees and native vegetation. Existing character trees would not be maintained by the proposed development. f. The proposed development would have an adverse effect on biodiversity, native vegetation, habitat and landscape quality g. The proposed development would not protect the land from adverse impacts on environmental values III. It fails to meet the Overall and Specific Outcomes of the Biodiversity Code in the following respects: a. The proposed development would not conserve the natural resources of Noosa Shire including native and remnant vegetation b. The proposed development would not conserve, manage, enhance and rehabilitate ecologically important areas to ensure long term ecological viability, integrity and sustainability of native flora and fauna species c. The proposed development would not avoid, minimise or mitigate impacts on the Shire’s biodiversity values and natural resources d. The proposed development would cause the clearing of protected vegetation. That clearing is not reasonably necessary and would not occur in an environmentally sensitive manner e. The proposed development would not retain necessary vegetation, would cause unacceptable fragmentation and edge effects, would not maximise Page 64 of 128
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.