Original source · versioned page text
2019-07-09 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 JULY 2019
the retention of existing vegetation and results in unacceptable clearing of
vegetation
f. The proposed development would not avoid new development being
located in a riparian buffer area
g. The proposed development has not been designed to avoid adverse
impacts on koalas and koala habitat
h. The proposed development would not protect appropriate habitat trees
i. The proposed development would not provide for ecologically important
areas to be restored and enhanced
j. The proposed development has not adopted appropriate fire management
measures which are based on ecological principles
k. The proposed development would result in the clearing of protected
vegetation in ecologically important areas and where that vegetation
contributes to scenic amenity and landscape values
l. The proposed development would result in the clearing of protected
vegetation where that clearing would increase the likelihood of adverse
impacts on scenic amenity and environmental values
IV. It fails to meet the Overall and Specific Outcomes of the Natural Hazards Overlay
Code in the following respects:
a. The proposed development would place people and property at a risk of
bushfire
b. The proposed development would not implement appropriate bushfire risk
mitigation treatments
c. The proposed development would compromise the safety of people and
property from bushfire
d. The proposed development would not be sited and designed to minimise
the risk to people and property from bushfire and would not maximise the
protection of people and property during the passage of a fire front
e. The proposed development would not maintain the safety of people and
property as the proposal has inappropriate house site areas and does not
employ appropriate fire mitigation methods. The proposal does not have
adequate firebreaks and emergency access.
f. The proposed development would not have appropriate lot design and
building siting to minimise bushfire hazard to people and property
V. It fails to meet the Overall and Specific Outcomes of the Natural Resources
Overlay Code in the following respects:
a. The proposed development would not protect agricultural land in the rural
zone from fragmentation and alienation
b. The proposed development would result in the fragmentation of agricultural
lands
c. The proposed development would permanently alienate agricultural land
from production
VI. It fails to meet the Overall and Specific Outcomes of the Reconfiguring a Lot
Code in the following respects:
a. The proposed development would result in lot sizes and dimensions
inappropriate for their intended use, lots that are unacceptable given their
Page 65 of 128
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.