Original source · versioned page text
2019-07-09 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (13.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 JULY 2019
DNR&W did not revise their decision and directed Council to refuse the application as:
The proposed lot boundaries are located in an area of remnant endangered regional
ecosystem and remnant of concern regional ecosystem and will result in fragmentation of
these areas;
Assessable vegetation to be cleared will reduce the water quality of the natural wetland as
there will be an increase in the amount of pollution and nutrients entering the wetland from
the effluent disposal systems and the runoff from buildings and roads that will be established
in the area mapped as a wetland regional ecosystem;
The area of aquatic and terrestrial habitat will be reduced on the site;
Clearing of assessable vegetation in proximity to a watercourse is likely to be undertaken to
define the boundary between lot 81 and park and will reduce the area of aquatic and
terrestrial habitat on the site;
Several of the large areas of remnant vegetation are fragmented by lot boundaries and
clearing for fences may fragment the connectivity of this vegetation and increase the area
subject to weed invasion;
The proposal does not maintain the current extent of endangered regional ecosystem and
remnant of concern regional ecosystem due to likely clearing for fencing of lot boundaries
and would change the structure of the ecosystem; and
An area of approximately 2 hectares identified as essential habitat is proposed to be cleared
for buildings and allotment boundaries. A large amount of fill will be required to raise the level
of this area so it no longer gets inundated.
During the appeal process the permit applicant amended the proposed layout which resulted in
reduction in lot yield from 81 lots to 52 lots and a park. DNR&W did not object to the new layout
and provided conditions. The conditions were to ensure that:
Assessable vegetation associated with natural wetlands and watercourses are protected to
maintain water quality and habitat.
The current extent of the regional ecosystems and endangered regional ecosystems are
maintained.
Areas of remnant vegetation are retained to maintain ecosystem functioning, remain in the
landscape despite threatening processes and maintain connectivity to adjacent properties.
The current extent of essential habitat is maintained.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The initial application was referred to the EPA as the site is situated partly within a Coastal
Management District. On 2 May 2008 the Agency provided conditions for approval.
The application was also referred to the Environmental Protection Agency as the site was identified
as being contaminated. On 2 April 2008 the Agency advised the site has been deleted from the
Environmental Management Register.
Advice
Department of Natural Resources & Water (DNR&W)
The initial application was referred to the Department of Natural Resources & Water as an advice
agency due to the potential for acid sulphate soils on the site. DNR&W provided their advice on
27 June 2008 recommending that an acid sulphate soils management plan be undertaken.
Page 76 of 128
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.