Original source · versioned page text
Stevens Gerber Submission MCU 15 0095 115 Eumundi Noosa Road
Attached to the e-mail MCUI15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submissions Object- Principal Tracy Stevens & Others.
Specific Outcome of Code Applicant’s Assessment Submitter’s Assessment
to shade vehicles and to reduce car parking area is located of the codes. The applicant has not satisfied
reflected radiation; between the petrol building this criteria as sufficient details have not
c) ensure canopy trees are protected and the fuel court. It is been provided as to how the DA achieves this
from vehicle damage by providing considered that trees will specific outcome.
adequate sized garden beds; limit casual surveillance of
d) maximise opportunities for this area.
infiltration of rainwater on-site;
and e) minimise contaminated The site comprises 30%
runoff entering the stormwater landscaping. This is
system and watercourse. considered more than
suitable.
BUIDLING WORKS CODE
O18 Lighting associated with the use S18.1- S18.3 Not Applicable Does not Comply
or works does not have an adverse It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
impact upon the amenity enjoyed by S18.4 Complies how the DA complies with the Code. The
users of adjoining or nearby premises All lighting will comply with applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
nor do it cause unreasonable the relevant requirements details have been provided as to how the DA
disturbance to local fauna. where possible. achieves this specific outcome that lighting
associated with the use or works does not
have an adverse impact upon the amenity
enjoyed by users of adjoining or nearby
premises.
DRIVEWAYS & CAR PARKING CODE
O1 Vehicular access does not S1.1- S1.3 Complies Does not Comply
adversely impact on safety, capacity Vehicle access is considered It is the applicant’s responsibility to establish
and operations of the existing or to be compliant with the how the DA complies with the Code. The
planned road network, the proposed relevant requirements. The applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
driveway, cycleways or pedestrian development will comply details have been provided as to how the DA
pathway systems. where applicable. achieves this specific outcome. The DA’s
vehicular access adversely impact on safety
of children using the pedestrian pathway to
and from the School. The proposed
Development will significantly increase the
amount of traffic using the access easement
and the Applicant fails to consider or address
how children will be able to safely cross the
access way to the service station in a safe
manner.
O4 Vehicular access does not S4.1 Complies Does not Comply
adversely impact on the capacity, The development will comply The current proposal will have a significant
operations and maintenance of the as required. adverse impact on the operation of the
existing road network in and around the
34
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original