Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

REPS M2915 - Negotiated Decision Representations_200522

of 16

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

.




          b. ADAC XML Digital File. ADAC File format (ADAC - Asset Design As Constructed) prepared in accordance with
            industry standards and recorded in “MGA - UTM56 / GDA94” projection.

          Please Note: Further information and advice relating to the as-constructed drawing presentation, as-constructed
          survey capture and associated guidelines for preparation of a compliant ADAC XML digital file are available on the
          webpage titled “As- Constructed Guidelines” and accessible at the Noosa Council Website: Planning &
          Development / Development Tools & Guidelines / As-Constructed Guidelines.

          c. The “As-Constructed” drawings will require certification by a:
                 i.   iii.Qualified experienced Civil Engineer (RPEQ) confirming design intent and conformance with applicable
                      standards and specifications, along with the relevant descriptions of assets, services and structures and;
                ii.   iv. Licensed Surveyor in regard to the cadastral and locational information, levels and applicable survey
                      datum.
          d. The data must be in accordance with Council’s “Planning Scheme Policy 6 – Engineering Design Standards”, and
              fully detail the levels for all engineering works including but not limited to the drainage network and structures,
              finished ground and pavement surface levels.


We look forward to Council’s consideration of our change representations and receiving Council’s Negotiated Decision
Notice as soon as possible.

Should you require any clarification on any of the above issues please do not hesitate to contact our office.



Yours faithfully,




TIMOTHY BALCOMBE
SENIOR URBAN PLANNER
JFP URBAN CONSULTANTS

CC/- Altum Property Group

APPENDICES

    Appendix A – Lift construction cost comparison (Morgan Consulting Engineers)

    Appendix B – Alternative design concept (Blackburne Jackson Design architects)

    Appendix C – Body Corporate fee estimate with lift (Cassels Strata, Strata Management Consultants)

    Appendix D – Amended landscape plans (Blackburne Jackson Design architects)

    Appendix E – Arborist assessment (ACA Arboricultural Contractors Australia)




JFP Ref: M2915                                                                                                      Page 16
Log in to download the original file

REPS M2915 - Negotiated Decision Representations_200522.pdf · 461 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.